Abortion

Later-Born Children in Large Families Also Found to Be at Risk
Re: Re: A change in the position statement *** Unfortunately true. -- Boris Post Reply Top of the thread Forum
Posted by: DWA
01/16/2007, 09:35:35
Author Profile (About author)

Edit
 Boris:"IF it was the issue, then we would be very similar to the Nazis in trying to create a superior race of humans. "

Hey, the Nazis had some things almost right. OYOH, they did favor large families for getting a plentiful supply of soldiers.

In a news item this morning, “Kids Might Drive You to an Early Grave”
by David Brown, Washington Post.

A photo caption:”The Stewart family is pictured in Spokane in 1889. Studies show that each child born in the family may not only have shortened lifespan of the parents, especially the mother, but his or her own, particularly children born late in the mother’s life.“

For starters, I found this link:

http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0033-5770(196406)39%3A2%3C130%3AFPOMAL%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Y

In brief: Okay, there are advantages to limiting family size. The mother carries a disproportionate burden. Anyway, it is shown like that in some studies of large families of the late 1800s

.
.
..
...
o
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29542
Pigs win constitutional protection
(o;
...
..
.
Cogito ergo spud: I think, therefore I yam (Yam = dolce spud)
. .

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert Where am i? Original Post Top of the thread Previous | Next | Current page

Abortion