| Some dumbing down is inevitable | |||
| Re: Re: Re: Shunning spelling reform: word roots clues -- Silverfox | Post Reply | ![]() |
Forum |
|
Posted by: Crossbowman 01/31/2007, 22:11:47 (About author)
Edit |
Some linguistic laziness seems to be endemic to society. Many teachers wept when the Webster folk broke down and added "ain't" to the dictionary, but when enough people say (or spell) something a certain way, it stops being "dumb" and becomes "the vernacular" instead. A few more decades and it's the accepted language, and the old way has that quaint notation, "archaic", beside it - and only we fogeys will remember that anyone actually ever did it that way. To whit: Chaucer - Shakespeare - Coleridge. "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" is a classic sprinkled through with archaic words and forms unfamiliar to the average reader, basically readable but when was the last time you heard the past-tense of speak used as "spake" or ran into the word "wist"? Shakespeare you have to practice at, the archaisms and odd sentence structures are so common, but once you develop the ear for it, it's kind of nice. Chaucer's a difficult read for the average American, the language having drifted so far in the intervening centuries, but if you've ever listened to it read in the correct time-period pronunciation, you'd think they were speaking an alien language: "Whan that Aprill, with his shoures soote
I like your Christ.
I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ. Mahatma Gandhi |
| Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert |
|
Previous | Next | Current page |
|