Re: "Child in utero" codified in USofA law

Re: "Child in utero" codified in USofA law
Re: "Child in utero" codified in USofA law -- DWA	Post Reply		Forum

Posted by: Sean Colgan
01/19/2008, 08:56:50

(About author)

Edit

Interesting! Yet, it is John Kerry who hit the nail on the head:
"I have serious concerns about this legislation because the law cannot simultaneously provide that a fetus is a human being and protect the right of the mother to choose to terminate her pregnancy."

He's right. This is a complete & utter contradiction. The Law has been stood on its ear.

Sean

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert

Previous | Next | Current page

Followups

Human law in general is rife with contradictions: towards precision language --- DWA ( 19-01-2008 ) ( 1050 bytes )
Re: Re: "Child in utero" codified in USofA law --- msrosie ( 21-01-2008 ) ( 666 bytes ) +2
- Right to die --- at a ripe old age --- DWA ( 22-01-2008 ) ( 976 bytes ) link
- Re: Re: Re: "Child in utero" codified in USofA law --- Sean Colgan ( 02-02-2008 ) ( 426 bytes ) +1
  - Even trees have feelings too --- DWA ( 03-02-2008 ) ( 800 bytes )