Re: Tight chain of evidence, and use of controls essential *** Not that easy..

Re: Tight chain of evidence, and use of controls essential *** Not that easy..
Re: Tight chain of evidence, and use of controls essential *** Not that easy... -- Boris	Post Reply		Forum

Posted by: cyanidefreak
07/03/2008, 16:31:26

(About author)

Edit

"FYI, you CANNOT get DNA from strands of hair UNLESS you have the follicle"

bullshit. you can get DNA from hair all day long.

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert

Previous | Next | Current page

Followups

Tight chain of evidence, and use of controls essential *** Not that easy.. --- Boris ( 2008-07-04 13:35 ) ( 398 bytes ) +1
- No DNA in hair strands. --- Boris ( 2008-07-04 13:49 ) ( 401 bytes ) +1
  - Correction --- crossbowman ( 2008-07-05 04:51 ) ( 1085 bytes ) link +2
    - Correction *** Wrong again... --- Boris ( 2008-07-05 12:59 ) ( 589 bytes ) +2
      - Re: Correction *** Wrong again... --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-14 12:10 ) ( 80 bytes ) +1
        
        Your ignorance is showing. Please do some research. --- Boris ( 2008-07-15 03:16 ) ( 829 bytes ) link +1
        
        I DID the research --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-15 09:27 ) ( 1242 bytes ) +1
        
        I DID the research **** In that case, you are reading challenged. --- Boris ( 2008-07-15 12:08 ) ( 1268 bytes ) link +1
        
        I was never challenged in the lab --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-15 12:45 ) ( 212 bytes ) +1
        
        IF you ever worked in a lab with DNA, you would know, but I guess you didn't. --- Boris ( 2008-07-15 13:43 ) ( 943 bytes ) link +3
        
        Re: IF you ever worked in a lab with DNA, you would know, but I guess you didn't --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-15 14:15 ) ( 89 bytes ) +1
        
        You also need to know what a follicle is. --- Boris ( 2008-07-15 18:12 ) ( 595 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: You also need to know what a follicle is. --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-15 18:33 ) ( 17 bytes )
        
        That's a poor job of enlightenment --- crossbowman ( 2008-07-15 15:08 ) ( 436 bytes ) +2
        
        Re: That's a poor job of enlightenment --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-15 16:12 ) ( 198 bytes ) link
        That's a poor job of enlightenment --- Boris ( 2008-07-15 18:29 ) ( 492 bytes ) +2
        
        abundant? , we don't need no stinking abundant --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-15 18:36 ) ( 132 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: abundant? , we don't need no stinking abundant --- Boris ( 2008-07-15 22:50 ) ( 510 bytes )
        
        His evidence says otherwise --- crossbowman ( 2008-07-17 15:34 ) ( 655 bytes ) +1
        
        Back to remedial forensics school: Preservatives in OJ blood --- DWA ( 2008-07-17 16:09 ) ( 1244 bytes ) link +1
        
        Or... --- crossbowman ( 2008-07-17 16:26 ) ( 630 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Or... --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-18 10:13 ) ( 77 bytes )
        
        I give up --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-15 15:59 ) ( 36 bytes ) +1
        
        I give up *** You should. You cannot come up with any facts. --- Boris ( 2008-07-15 22:53 ) ( 80 bytes ) +1
        
        He has. You ignore them. --- crossbowman ( 2008-07-17 15:25 ) ( 295 bytes ) +1
        
        perhaps this might explain. --- Boris ( 2008-07-18 12:27 ) ( 490 bytes ) link +1
        
        Re: perhaps this might explain. --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-18 14:48 ) ( 328 bytes ) +1
        
        Some DNA locations are easier to map than others? --- DWA ( 2008-07-18 15:50 ) ( 600 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Some DNA locations are easier to map than others? --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-18 16:02 ) ( 211 bytes )
      - sigh. You are wrong. --- crossbowman ( 2008-07-15 14:56 ) ( 697 bytes )
    - Re: Correction --- Silverfox ( 2008-07-15 04:03 ) ( 1 bytes ) link +1
      - Well worth the wait --- DWA ( 2008-07-16 11:52 ) ( 795 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Well worth the wait --- Silverfox ( 2008-07-16 13:45 ) ( 119 bytes ) +1
        
        Masochistic arse-oles need love, too --- DWA ( 2008-07-16 17:18 ) ( 335 bytes )