Modesty, Nudity, and the Law: --- DWA ( 21-06-2008 ) ( 759 bytes ) link +9 Re: Modesty, Nudity, and the Law: --- duroc ( 22-06-2008 ) ( 1454 bytes ) +1   Kinky uncensored Finns and kats? --- DWA ( 23-06-2008 ) ( 1258 bytes ) +1 Re: Kinky uncensored Finns and kats? --- Duroc ( 24-06-2008 ) ( 943 bytes ) +1 YM"X"A, 1960s+ --- DWA ( 24-06-2008 ) ( 1184 bytes ) +1 Re: YM"X"A, 1960s+ --- Duroc ( 25-06-2008 ) ( 1401 bytes ) +1   Tarnished halo effect using speakerphone function --- DWA ( 25-06-2008 ) ( 1007 bytes ) God wants you nude --- cyanidefreak ( 26-06-2008 ) ( 455 bytes ) +1   A closet full of penis gourds. --- DWA ( 26-06-2008 ) ( 439 bytes ) +1 Re: A closet full of penis gourds. --- cyanidefreak ( 26-06-2008 ) ( 222 bytes ) link

When in Rome.. --- homer ( 09-01-2008 ) ( 512 bytes ) +4   Physics also evolves. Testing heroes by them explaining the elementary? --- DWA ( 09-01-2008 ) ( 603 bytes ) +1 Re: Physics also evolves. Testing heroes by them explaining the elementary? --- homer ( 09-01-2008 ) ( 297 bytes ) +1   I like your formulation, there --- DWA ( 10-01-2008 ) ( 931 bytes ) +1 Re: I like your formulation, there --- homer ( 18-01-2008 ) ( 355 bytes )

TT Frank can't take a hit or even a possible near miss --- DWA ( 03-01-2008 ) ( 1095 bytes ) link +9 Remember what your pappy said. --- crossbowman ( 04-01-2008 ) ( 2614 bytes ) +2 Sanitation rules in untidy laboratory: where to test new theories? --- DWA ( 04-01-2008 ) ( 2162 bytes ) link +1   I am pleased to amuse. --- crossbowman ( 17-01-2008 ) ( 3092 bytes ) +1   In this corner.....Frank's Army of One --- DWA ( 18-01-2008 ) ( 742 bytes ) history repeats itself --- Frank ( 04-01-2008 ) ( 962 bytes ) big brave DWA --- Frank ( 04-01-2008 ) ( 694 bytes ) +1 Posted mainly just for the record: {Perils of the half-hearted censor} --- DWA ( 04-01-2008 ) ( 1008 bytes ) +1 your broken record? --- Frank ( 07-01-2008 ) ( 2011 bytes ) +1   Set the high standard. Frank can't go beyond the 4+ senses? --- DWA ( 08-01-2008 ) ( 865 bytes )

How far do we go? --- Duroc ( 10-12-2007 ) ( 1565 bytes ) +9 Re: How far do we go? --- Silverfox ( 11-12-2007 ) ( 195 bytes ) link +1 Re: Re: How far do we go? --- Duroc ( 12-12-2007 ) ( 808 bytes ) +2 X-Rate the web? --- DWA ( 13-12-2007 ) ( 1096 bytes ) +1 Re: X-Rate the web? --- Duroc ( 13-12-2007 ) ( 1327 bytes ) +1   America's funniest home videos was racy this week. Playboy Philosophy --- DWA ( 13-12-2007 ) ( 1724 bytes ) link +1 Re: America's funniest home videos was racy this week. Playboy Philosophy --- duroc ( 14-12-2007 ) ( 971 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: America's funniest home videos was racy this week. Playboy Philosophy --- Silverfox ( 14-12-2007 ) ( 158 bytes ) +1 Decriminalize horizontal prostitution for prosthetic users --- DWA ( 14-12-2007 ) ( 955 bytes )   Re: Re: Re: How far do we go? --- Silverfox ( 13-12-2007 ) ( 1270 bytes )

Deleting a post by Amaranth --- Remi ( 18-07-2007 ) ( 423 bytes )

What exactly is censorship? --- AwesomeMachine ( 11-02-2007 ) ( 4766 bytes ) +3 Cows in skirts, by local custom, and PBS exploring Mt. Ararat on mares --- DWA ( 11-02-2007 ) ( 331 bytes ) +1 I really didn't think anyone would reply --- AwesomeMachine ( 11-02-2007 ) ( 2345 bytes ) +1   Tilt --- DWA ( 11-02-2007 ) ( 1072 bytes )

Courtney Love bares all. A Brando goes Warp 1? --- DWA ( 12-11-2006 ) ( 798 bytes ) link

If "illegal" pornography is blocked, then is that censorship? --- DWA ( 04-11-2006 ) ( 283 bytes ) link +12 This spells it out pretty good! --- skeptic-D ( 05-11-2006 ) ( 81 bytes ) +1 Ink blots, Yes, or NO? --- DWA ( 05-11-2006 ) ( 859 bytes ) Apparently you do have problems. --- skibummer ( 06-11-2006 ) ( 430 bytes ) +1 Got "shots" for that? --- DWA ( 07-11-2006 ) ( 429 bytes ) link +1 This fit's you best! --- skeptic-D ( 07-11-2006 ) ( 113 bytes ) +2 Yet more even drier staler cheese --- DWA ( 08-11-2006 ) ( 245 bytes ) +1 Re: Yet more even drier staler cheese --- skeptic-D ( 09-11-2006 ) ( 148 bytes ) Corrections --- skibummer ( 11-11-2006 ) ( 289 bytes ) +1 Re: Corrections --- skeptic-D ( 12-11-2006 ) ( 22 bytes ) +1 Smoochy smoochy, and censored cheap generic deodorants. PBS nude art --- DWA ( 12-11-2006 ) ( 939 bytes ) +2 What else is there to say? --- skeptic-D ( 12-11-2006 ) ( 113 bytes )   I guess I can --- skibummer ( 19-11-2006 ) ( 388 bytes )

Should the bridge owner also be the eminent troll? --- DWA ( 25-08-2006 ) ( 1222 bytes ) link +5 Re: Should the bridge owner also be the eminent troll? --- Silverfox ( 26-08-2006 ) ( 140 bytes ) link +1 Gruff ruff, mean old troll won't let people pass by --- DWA ( 26-08-2006 ) ( 528 bytes )   Gee who didn't see this coming! --- skibummer ( 26-08-2006 ) ( 1172 bytes ) +1 The bet is: ---- a bananna has no vestigal balls OR mammaries+*def. --- DWA ( 26-08-2006 ) ( 1195 bytes ) +1 I will take that bet then --- skibummer ( 26-08-2006 ) ( 1805 bytes )

TT Evo, LABOR of censorship, UNAPPRECIATED --- DWA ( 06-06-2006 ) ( 2775 bytes ) link +1   Not quite true --- skibummer ( 07-06-2006 ) ( 1375 bytes )

Frank's TT Evo Puppet Show --- DWA ( 03-06-2006 ) ( 865 bytes ) link

Frank gets his wish, and threatens to delete, anyway --- DWA ( 01-03-2006 ) ( 776 bytes ) link +4 Darned if you do, darned if you don't --- Crossbowman ( 02-03-2006 ) ( 490 bytes ) +1 Experimenting with numbered posts --- DWA ( 03-03-2006 ) ( 969 bytes ) +1 Like I said,... --- Crossbowman ( 03-03-2006 ) ( 308 bytes ) +1   Could be worse, yes. One way valves --- DWA ( 04-03-2006 ) ( 837 bytes )

Google censorship+ --- DWA ( 08-02-2006 ) ( 5543 bytes ) link

Satellite receiver ownership in Iraq - Reporters without frontiers --- DWA ( 04-02-2006 ) ( 1005 bytes ) link

Moderator's irresistable itch: does it show insecurity? --- DWA ( 01-01-2006 ) ( 1067 bytes ) link +3 Quick answer: No it doesn't --- skibummer ( 02-01-2006 ) ( 1561 bytes ) +1 Howard Stern move to satellite radio --- DWA ( 10-01-2006 ) ( 1322 bytes ) link +1   Empty threats --- skibummer ( 10-01-2006 ) ( 740 bytes )

Yellowsnowjob impeaching himself --- DWA ( 30-10-2005 ) ( 1204 bytes ) link +2 Lets save time and bandwidth --- skibummer ( 31-10-2005 ) ( 177 bytes ) link +1   Topic: Censorship Questions better answered here? Sub-set robots --- DWA ( 01-11-2005 ) ( 934 bytes )

Tat deleted more benign material than Ski ever would . . . DWA will ignore it. --- Julie D. ( 14-10-2005 ) ( 931 bytes ) link +9 Reverse censorship: Union political $$$ on behalf of their members? --- DWA ( 15-10-2005 ) ( 2625 bytes ) link +1 Suddenly, DWA finds something slightly more interesting than deleted posts. --- Julie D. ( 16-10-2005 ) ( 306 bytes ) +1 Unwieldy crime scenes, and scarce Sherlocks getting no appreciation --- DWA ( 16-10-2005 ) ( 1307 bytes ) +1 It's not rocket science. --- Julie D. ( 16-10-2005 ) ( 1144 bytes ) +1 Atheists for life? JulieD in agendaed denial? --- DWA ( 16-10-2005 ) ( 1148 bytes ) +1   No, it appears Julie is correct --- skibummer ( 17-10-2005 ) ( 185 bytes ) +1   Mister TT Contrary --- DWA ( 17-10-2005 ) ( 852 bytes ) +1 Mister TT Contrary (AKA dwa) --- skibummer ( 18-10-2005 ) ( 1017 bytes ) Will JulieD ignore this? --- DWA ( 21-10-2005 ) ( 931 bytes ) link

We should talk about censorship, sometime. --- Julie D. ( 22-09-2005 ) ( 255 bytes ) +62 Good idea --- skibummer ( 22-09-2005 ) ( 540 bytes ) +1 Pre-empting slander? --- DWA ( 22-09-2005 ) ( 827 bytes ) +3 Re: Pre-empting slander? --- skibummer ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 679 bytes ) +1 A deep grasp of censorship, here? --- DWA ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 689 bytes ) +2 But deep down, you are really shallow. LOL --- skibummer ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 1453 bytes ) +1   Never fearing --- DWA ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 604 bytes ) +1 Re: Never fearing --- skibummer ( 24-09-2005 ) ( 1119 bytes ) +1 Retreat, or set-back? --- DWA ( 25-09-2005 ) ( 990 bytes ) +1 Neither of course --- skibummer ( 25-09-2005 ) ( 1790 bytes ) Re: A deep grasp of censorship, here? --- skeptic-D ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 42 bytes ) +1 Please Please don't do this --- skibummer ( 24-09-2005 ) ( 143 bytes )   This is not an "open, public forum"! Not!! NOT!!! PUBLIC!!! NOT!!! --- Julie D. ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 1389 bytes ) +1 In effect, TT is open and public. Let's ask Remi? --- DWA ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 1706 bytes ) +1 Re: In effect, TT is open and public. Let's ask Remi? --- skeptic-D ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 387 bytes ) As usual for DWA! --- skeptic-D ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 690 bytes ) +1   Re: As usual for DWA! --- Remi ( 16-10-2005 ) ( 38 bytes ) +1 Time wounds all heels. Hurricane Katrina PTSD? --- DWA ( 16-10-2005 ) ( 1617 bytes ) link Hey, Jules. I am the expert on this topic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --- Tatiana ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 540 bytes ) +2 Really???????????????????????????????????????????? Wow. --- Julie D. ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 3264 bytes ) +4   Property analogy seems to be legally flawed+ --- DWA ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 3714 bytes ) +1 Re: Property analogy seems to be legally flawed+ --- skeptic-D ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 66 bytes ) +1   Numbered days are not for atheists --- DWA ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 299 bytes ) +1 Re: Numbered days are not for atheists --- skeptic-D ( 24-09-2005 ) ( 151 bytes ) You taught me something Julie --- skibummer ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 1872 bytes ) +1 Re: You taught me something Julie --- skeptic-D ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 481 bytes ) Re: Really???????????????????????????????????????????? Wow. --- skeptic-D ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 67 bytes ) I mostly agree with Remi's hands off approach --- Tatiana ( 24-09-2005 ) ( 964 bytes ) +2 You do realize --- skibummer ( 24-09-2005 ) ( 53 bytes ) +1 Of course, I realize that. Stuff was banned because he was annoying. --- Tatiana ( 25-09-2005 ) ( 61 bytes ) +1 Actually... --- Crossbowman ( 25-09-2005 ) ( 276 bytes ) +1 You are correct --- skibummer ( 25-09-2005 ) ( 189 bytes ) +1   Pleading for banning is censorious -- S/bummer is therefore a liar --- DWA ( 26-09-2005 ) ( 1133 bytes ) +2 Re: Pleading for banning is censorious -- S/bummer is therefore a liar --- skeptic-D ( 26-09-2005 ) ( 436 bytes ) Hey, just continue to make things up. It has become expected of you. --- skibummer ( 26-09-2005 ) ( 481 bytes ) +1 Chinese strawmen and hiding messages in digital photos --- DWA ( 26-09-2005 ) ( 745 bytes ) +1 And? --- skibummer ( 27-09-2005 ) ( 305 bytes ) +1   String recap, showing S/bummer gasping for air, in trouble in deep water. --- DWA ( 28-09-2005 ) ( 2729 bytes ) +1 How can you do a recap on such a mess? --- skibummer ( 28-09-2005 ) ( 1937 bytes ) +1 S/bummer confesses? --- DWA ( 29-09-2005 ) ( 978 bytes ) +1 dwa projects --- skibummer ( 29-09-2005 ) ( 682 bytes ) Re: I mostly agree with Remi's hands off approach --- Julie D. ( 25-09-2005 ) ( 952 bytes ) +2 A bit more than symbolic? DWA CAN show censorship episodes. --- DWA ( 25-09-2005 ) ( 2146 bytes ) +1 I should leave this for Julie --- skibummer ( 25-09-2005 ) ( 2251 bytes ) It doesn't compare. --- Tatiana ( 25-09-2005 ) ( 522 bytes ) +2 Re: It doesn't compare. --- Julie D. ( 25-09-2005 ) ( 446 bytes ) +1 Damn Girl, You are good. --- skibummer ( 25-09-2005 ) ( 157 bytes ) +1 Hooray, S/bummer picks up his marbles and leaves the playground? --- DWA ( 26-09-2005 ) ( 349 bytes ) +2 Re: Hooray, S/bummer picks up his marbles and leaves the playground? --- skeptic-D ( 26-09-2005 ) ( 64 bytes ) +1 December --- skibummer ( 26-09-2005 ) ( 339 bytes ) +2 Your personal, private definition of censoring, please? --- DWA ( 26-09-2005 ) ( 1460 bytes ) +1 Why bother? --- skibummer ( 27-09-2005 ) ( 2722 bytes ) link Re: December --- skeptic-D ( 27-09-2005 ) ( 239 bytes ) +1 Today's TT Question for the wise --- DWA ( 27-09-2005 ) ( 782 bytes ) +1 Re: Today's TT Question for the wise --- skeptic-D ( 27-09-2005 ) ( 1309 bytes ) So that is what you really want --- skibummer ( 26-09-2005 ) ( 328 bytes ) Tat, that is the point --- skibummer ( 25-09-2005 ) ( 870 bytes ) +1 Big brother in his role as children protector/correcter --- DWA ( 26-09-2005 ) ( 385 bytes ) +1   Thanks for showing my point --- skibummer ( 26-09-2005 ) ( 445 bytes ) +1 Show me the accurate polls? --- DWA ( 26-09-2005 ) ( 330 bytes ) +1 Polls? --- skibummer ( 27-09-2005 ) ( 747 bytes ) Re: Hey, Jules. I am the expert on this topic! --- skeptic-D ( 23-09-2005 ) ( 96 bytes ) Coming soon, in a dispenser near you: Mao-mao condoms --- DWA ( 24-09-2005 ) ( 653 bytes ) link

TT Politics censorship raises its ugly perverted head, AGAIN --- DWA ( 11-09-2005 ) ( 1162 bytes ) link +67   Dwa jumps to wrong conclusion AGAIN. --- skibummer ( 13-09-2005 ) ( 1433 bytes ) +2   Also hard to miss at TT Abortion+ --- DWA ( 13-09-2005 ) ( 2165 bytes ) +1 Yes it is hard to miss, that is why I mentioned it. --- skibummer ( 14-09-2005 ) ( 3074 bytes ) Wrong ski!! My post is NOT still there. --- Tatiana ( 14-09-2005 ) ( 361 bytes ) +2 Rushing to the river bottom --- DWA ( 14-09-2005 ) ( 1291 bytes ) +1 Silly as usual --- skibummer ( 14-09-2005 ) ( 2328 bytes ) You posted a number --- skibummer ( 14-09-2005 ) ( 431 bytes ) +1 Nobody, but nobody, --- Julie D. ( 15-09-2005 ) ( 611 bytes ) +3 Hawhaw --- DWA ( 15-09-2005 ) ( 563 bytes ) +1 Re: Hawhaw --- skeptic-D ( 15-09-2005 ) ( 733 bytes ) +1 Thanks to both of you --- skibummer ( 15-09-2005 ) ( 892 bytes ) +2 Please do tell me more about what you think other people REALLY think --- DWA ( 16-09-2005 ) ( 732 bytes ) +1 As opposed to what you imagine --- skibummer ( 16-09-2005 ) ( 1034 bytes ) +1 Driving off, or a drawing card? --- DWA ( 16-09-2005 ) ( 1136 bytes ) +1 Certainly NOT a drawing card. --- skibummer ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 1751 bytes ) Prove that you know what you are talking about --- Tatiana ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 568 bytes ) +2 --- Tatiana ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 1 bytes ) Re: Prove that you know what you are talking about --- skibummer ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 606 bytes ) +2 Yards of posts disappering under the smelly black waters --- DWA ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 1768 bytes ) +3 Re: Yards of posts disappering under the smelly black waters --- skeptic-D ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 216 bytes ) +1 Cheer up, you are only about "40" in the hexadecimal numbering system. --- DWA ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 120 bytes ) +1 Re: Cheer up, you are only about "40" in the hexadecimal numbering system. --- skeptic-D ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 424 bytes ) Trying reading what was written --- skibummer ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 2415 bytes ) +1   Ask Remi about that, please, S'bummer --- DWA ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 1127 bytes ) +1 No need to --- skibummer ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 815 bytes ) DWA, I challenge you to prove that you know what you are talking about. --- Tatiana ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 143 bytes ) +1 Everything that G-d knows, cannot be explained to mere mortals+ --- DWA ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 4200 bytes ) So I know exactly as much as you do about how to "operate" the TT. --- Tatiana ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 276 bytes ) +1 It would appear not --- skibummer ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 771 bytes ) +1 Liar!! You say I accused you, and that I made the error. You know the truth . --- Tatiana ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 1138 bytes ) I did not accuse ski. I did not lie. I am not mistaken. --- Tatiana ( 16-09-2005 ) ( 1279 bytes ) +1 Re: I did not accuse ski. I did not lie. I am not mistaken. --- skibummer ( 16-09-2005 ) ( 378 bytes ) +1 Can we consider more closely? --- Tatiana ( 16-09-2005 ) ( 227 bytes ) +1 Okay, lets --- skibummer ( 16-09-2005 ) ( 408 bytes ) Julie, I would like to request that you drop accusations about the past. --- Tatiana ( 16-09-2005 ) ( 1348 bytes ) +2 If I may Julie --- skibummer ( 16-09-2005 ) ( 985 bytes ) +3 Two cents? No way. --- DWA ( 16-09-2005 ) ( 1014 bytes ) +1   At least there is hope --- skibummer ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 434 bytes ) +1 Cite one reasonable personal rationale? --- DWA ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 469 bytes ) +1 Why? --- skibummer ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 465 bytes ) For Tat & Ski --- skeptic-D ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 3522 bytes ) +1 Your post is deeply revolting psychobabble --- Tatiana ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 345 bytes ) +1 Re: Your post is deeply revolting psychobabble --- skeptic-D ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 862 bytes ) The definition of "lie" is quite idiosyncratic here --- Tatiana ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 628 bytes ) +1 Re: The definition of "lie" is quite idiosyncratic here --- skibummer ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 426 bytes ) Okay. --- Julie D. ( 16-09-2005 ) ( 706 bytes ) +2 I don't miss Brett. Well, maybe a little, on a good day. --- Tatiana ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 53 bytes ) +1 Some were --- skibummer ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 333 bytes ) +2   Arrogant atheist stupidity? --- DWA ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 771 bytes ) +1 And it is no wonder you were his favorite target --- skibummer ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 503 bytes ) +1 I thought that I was Brett's favourite target --- Tatiana ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 64 bytes ) +2 Not even close --- skibummer ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 490 bytes ) Re: I thought that I was Brett's favourite target --- skeptic-D ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 730 bytes ) Brett considered those who disagreed with him stupid --- Tatiana ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 302 bytes ) +3   Verbal combat is FUN --- DWA ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 709 bytes ) He didn't consider me stupid --- skibummer ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 640 bytes ) Re: Brett considered those who disagreed with him stupid --- skeptic-D ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 1542 bytes ) Bright enough to be devious? --- DWA ( 17-09-2005 ) ( 892 bytes ) +1 Does electric behaviour cause things it isn't supposed to cause? --- Tatiana ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 2893 bytes ) +2   It could be an adapted stun gun --- DWA ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 1638 bytes ) Re: Does electric behaviour cause things it isn't supposed to cause? --- skibummer ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 241 bytes ) +1 I suppose that's true, unless I am sending something that confuses Remi's system --- Tatiana ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 251 bytes ) +1 Think about this --- skibummer ( 18-09-2005 ) ( 1691 bytes ) +1 How about answering my questions? Feel free to replace words. --- Tatiana ( 19-09-2005 ) ( 824 bytes ) +1 Moderator versus Censor --- skibummer ( 20-09-2005 ) ( 1592 bytes ) +1 S/bummer gets to the meat of the message?+++ --- DWA ( 21-09-2005 ) ( 1644 bytes ) +1 Dwa misses sarcasm (and other things) --- skibummer ( 21-09-2005 ) ( 1910 bytes ) link

Freedom of inquiry, discussion, teaching --- DWA ( 24-08-2005 ) ( 171 bytes )

Defensive unintellectual TT board weaklings? --- DWA ( 02-05-2005 ) ( 855 bytes ) link +10 I knew you would wind up here (edit for missing word) --- skibummer ( 03-05-2005 ) ( 1190 bytes ) +1 Alien exercises in persuasion and a study in comparative debating --- DWA ( 03-05-2005 ) ( 770 bytes ) link +1 Re: Alien exercises in persuasion and a study in comparative debating --- skibummer ( 03-05-2005 ) ( 334 bytes ) +1 Life as an alien, and life with aliens --- DWA ( 04-05-2005 ) ( 198 bytes ) +1 Insults of foreigners? --- skibummer ( 04-05-2005 ) ( 722 bytes ) +2 Go to 1930s France or Germany for bizarre conceptions. Riefenstahl? --- DWA ( 04-05-2005 ) ( 1160 bytes ) +1 More dissembling --- skibummer ( 04-05-2005 ) ( 491 bytes )   why does he value Tat so much, then? --- xrage ( 04-05-2005 ) ( 172 bytes ) +1   What's irrational about disliking a dictator? X-rage's bad. --- DWA ( 04-05-2005 ) ( 1108 bytes ) +1 While it is possible --- skibummer ( 04-05-2005 ) ( 299 bytes )

PORN ON THE INTERNET!!! --- Randy Barker ( 11-04-2005 ) ( 241 bytes ) +3   No clothes here, (naked picture), and in court testimony, too --- DWA ( 12-04-2005 ) ( 476 bytes ) link So there were no pedophiles . . . ? --- Julie D. ( 13-04-2005 ) ( 553 bytes ) Feminist anti-porn campaigner dies --- DWA ( 13-04-2005 ) ( 1191 bytes ) link

Petty censorship is practised at TT Politics --- DWA ( 08-04-2005 ) ( 449 bytes ) link +14 Mr. Kettle meet Mr. Black --- skibummer ( 09-04-2005 ) ( 444 bytes ) +1   A name in a subject line is NOT name-calling. --- DWA ( 09-04-2005 ) ( 1010 bytes ) +1 Silly --- skibummer ( 09-04-2005 ) ( 808 bytes ) +1 Let us clarify: Ski will censor for no valid reason, even. --- DWA ( 09-04-2005 ) ( 1124 bytes ) +1 Sniff. Whaaaaaaaaa! --- Melanie ( 09-04-2005 ) ( 88 bytes ) +1   Inverted perverted hatchet-swinging censors flock together +2nd example --- DWA ( 10-04-2005 ) ( 301 bytes ) +1   DWA, stop talking to yourself. --- Melanie ( 10-04-2005 ) ( 1 bytes ) +1   Mel's subject line would have been "illegal" at TT Politics --- DWA ( 10-04-2005 ) ( 273 bytes ) +1 Re: Mel's subject line would have been "illegal" at TT Politics --- Melanie ( 11-04-2005 ) ( 192 bytes ) +1 Moderators --- skibummer ( 11-04-2005 ) ( 875 bytes ) link +1 Ski bum licks his wounds, with Melanie. --- DWA ( 12-04-2005 ) ( 725 bytes ) +1   Chalking up --- skibummer ( 12-04-2005 ) ( 502 bytes ) +1 Peace? --- DWA ( 12-04-2005 ) ( 841 bytes ) +1 Re: Peace? --- skibummer ( 12-04-2005 ) ( 386 bytes )

F*cking villagers vote against name change --- DWA ( 15-01-2005 ) ( 665 bytes ) link +10   Re: F*cking villagers vote against name change --- Dedken ( 09-03-2005 ) ( 56 bytes ) +1 Rakish T.V. commercials --- DWA ( 10-03-2005 ) ( 115 bytes ) +1   Re:Re: Rakish T.V. commercials --- Silverfox ( 11-03-2005 ) ( 145 bytes ) Russia has a detergent named "Barf" --- Tatiana ( 12-03-2005 ) ( 192 bytes ) +1   No va - No go --- DWA ( 12-03-2005 ) ( 551 bytes ) +1   Re: No va - No go --- Silverfox ( 13-03-2005 ) ( 716 bytes ) +1   Don't let the mothers drink in the first place --- DWA ( 13-03-2005 ) ( 1161 bytes ) +1 You do realize --- skibummer ( 14-03-2005 ) ( 224 bytes ) +1 Moderatorship was not a factor --- DWA ( 14-03-2005 ) ( 673 bytes ) +1 Mel from Hell.... --- Melanie ( 16-03-2005 ) ( 136 bytes )

"Experts" on porn, but not really, warn Congress about "brain stuff." --- Julie D. ( 01-12-2004 ) ( 3691 bytes ) link +3 Since Va Tech is close --- skibummer ( 02-12-2004 ) ( 381 bytes ) link   Actually....... --- Silverfox ( 02-12-2004 ) ( 138 bytes ) Re: "Experts" on porn, but not really, warn Congress about "brain stuff." --- Randy Barker ( 11-04-2005 ) ( 30 bytes )

Screw the censor!!! --- BubbaBear ( 09-11-2004 ) ( 594 bytes ) link

Suppressed News & Media Elites --- DWA ( 08-11-2004 ) ( 1678 bytes ) link

Yuck! --- Bro ( 20-10-2004 ) ( 518 bytes ) +3 Skirts & halters on cows --- DWA ( 21-10-2004 ) ( 416 bytes )   Re: Yuck! --- Randy Barker ( 11-04-2005 ) ( 72 bytes )   Re: Yuck! --- Randy Barker ( 11-04-2005 ) ( 72 bytes )