Censorship and Pornography

Tilt  
Re: I really didn't think anyone would reply -- AwesomeMachine Post Reply Top of the thread Forum
Posted by: DWA
02/11/2007, 12:38:37
Author Profile (About author)

Edit
 AwesomeMachine:"This is where people fundamentally differ: To people without souls, other people are just flesh, and whatever doesn't injure the flesh is permissible."

Please define "soul", and describe who/what may have it. I think you may be on Judaeo-Christian theologically shaky quicksand. Quick impression, you are inventing things as you go along. I kinda like that "creativeness", however.

Confession: I certainly don't know much for certain about "soul". I like to believe that "it" exists, "eternally", maybe, even. Maybe just as part of a greater whole, however.

Furthering my theme of (debatable) "innocence", I recall hearing "Unto the pure, all things are pure".

On clothing: I think it merely may be more often of utility at hiding ugliness, rather than beauty. Certainly clothing is more popular in cold climates. And I'm going out on a limb, most people with "temporal" power over others, dictating dress and tidiness standards don't really have beautiful bodies, or orderly philosophies, even, Arnold Schwarzenegger notwithstanding.

.
.
..
...
o
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29542
Pigs win constitutional protection
(o;
...
..
.
Cogito ergo spud: I think, therefore I yam (Yam = dolce spud)
. .

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert Where am i? Original Post Top of the thread Previous | Next | Current page

Censorship and Pornography