So what if your wife makes good fried chicken or will have sex with you.

Folks still like to go out to eat. Your counter analogy doesn't hold water, and kinda has the unintended consequence of actually supporting my point. If we didn't know restaurants had killer-good food available we'd never even know we could venture out for something different.

I have no intention of wasting my time trying to "Prove" this in any clinical, scientific, statistical, or any other matter. Don't have to. Only perverts really need to ask for anything more than obviousity on these matters.

Hell, look at Remi . . . . he thinks the harm in banging kids is "unproven". Just because some kids get over it doesn't make it okay. Heck, a 2 year old kid might see his parents, grandparents, dog and goldfish killed right before their eyes and be able to get over it. But that doesn't make it "harmless" for the child.

Further, I can demonstrate, in no uncertain terms that molesting a child is harmful . . . particularly if I catch up to them before the cops do. Gonna be "harm" all over the place, I assure you.

Please CB, don't waste your time taking up the pervert platform. You assume I'm one of these chuckleheads who is gonna spend hours trying to come up with googled crap to support my position. You really should know I don't do very much of that.

I don't have to. I can support my position with little more than my philosophy. I don't have to google up crutches very often.
If you say the sky is plaid and I say it's blue, and you say "prove it" all I say is "Look up" . . . . and I don't mean " . . on Google"