Toronto Canada "pediatrician" enabled false convictions --- DWA ( 2008-01-29 08:37 ) ( 575 bytes ) link

hahaha --- duroc ( 2007-08-28 03:09 ) ( 906 bytes ) +5   Laughing brats drive exasperated parents crazy & may solve the malware problem --- DWA ( 2007-08-29 09:19 ) ( 1509 bytes ) Hahaha? --- crossbowman ( 2007-08-29 15:02 ) ( 3801 bytes ) +1 Re: Hahaha? --- duroc ( 2007-08-30 21:51 ) ( 1110 bytes ) +1 Couple or three points --- crossbowman ( 2007-08-31 18:45 ) ( 1702 bytes ) +1 Chidren punishing parents and honest parental motives, etc. --- DWA ( 2007-09-01 14:26 ) ( 1567 bytes )

Bad parents, bad docs, bad combination --- crossbowman ( 2007-03-23 19:55 ) ( 1437 bytes ) link +1 First, do no harm +follow up chronology --- DWA ( 2007-03-24 10:44 ) ( 677 bytes )

Minimum marriage age in IraN --- DWA ( 2006-11-15 13:46 ) ( 1 bytes ) +6 Re: Minimum marriage age in IraN --- skibummer ( 2006-11-19 13:41 ) ( 121 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Minimum marriage age in IraN --- Silverfox ( 2006-11-20 10:31 ) ( 65 bytes ) +1 Cultural differences can get bizarre --- DWA ( 2006-11-21 11:00 ) ( 706 bytes ) +2 Re: Cultural differences can get bizarre --- Silverfox ( 2006-11-22 05:05 ) ( 14109 bytes ) Re: Cultural differences can get bizarre --- Silverfox ( 2006-11-22 05:25 ) ( 16 bytes ) link +1 Organising the 72 virgin inventory: Taxing even to a childlike faith --- DWA ( 2006-11-22 10:43 ) ( 944 bytes )

Abuse begins in the womb, can continue unwittingly after birth --- DWA ( 2005-12-26 12:17 ) ( 2444 bytes ) link +2 Multiple links complicate an edit --- DWA ( 2005-12-26 12:26 ) ( 649 bytes ) link +1   Not as much as your weird post --- skibummer ( 2005-12-26 19:39 ) ( 718 bytes ) link

Abuse --- AwesomeMachine ( 2005-10-30 01:36 ) ( 10130 bytes ) +5 Re: Abuse --- Julie D. ( 2005-10-31 19:45 ) ( 1971 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Abuse --- AwesomeMachine ( 2005-11-08 02:01 ) ( 2198 bytes ) Profound. Prozac? --- DWA ( 2005-10-31 19:52 ) ( 903 bytes ) link +1 Re: Profound. Prozac? --- AwesomeMachine ( 2005-11-08 01:03 ) ( 8646 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Profound. Prozac? --- Silverfox ( 2006-11-16 01:52 ) ( 66 bytes )

Jeb's philosophy clearly isn't working out for him. --- Julie D. ( 2005-09-22 12:10 ) ( 990 bytes ) link +9 Re: Jeb's philosophy clearly isn't working out for him. --- skibummer ( 2005-09-23 12:10 ) ( 719 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Jeb's philosophy clearly isn't working out for him. --- skeptic-D ( 2005-09-25 21:04 ) ( 342 bytes ) +1 But you didn't answer the question --- skibummer ( 2005-09-26 19:40 ) ( 34 bytes ) +1 Re: But you didn't answer the question --- skeptic-D ( 2005-09-26 23:49 ) ( 6384 bytes ) +1 No --- skibummer ( 2005-09-27 19:59 ) ( 182 bytes ) +1 Re: No --- skeptic-D ( 2005-09-28 01:16 ) ( 199 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: No --- skibummer ( 2005-09-28 19:14 ) ( 324 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: No --- skeptic-D ( 2005-09-28 22:58 ) ( 557 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: No --- skibummer ( 2005-09-29 07:15 ) ( 280 bytes )

What do you think of this. --- rendar ( 2005-06-19 10:26 ) ( 2868 bytes )

Here's the part of the logic class that Ski slept through --- tatiana ( 2005-06-19 04:15 ) ( 1220 bytes ) link +39   Skibummer the intellectshul spreader --- DWA ( 2005-06-19 12:34 ) ( 856 bytes ) +1 Twiddle dee and Twiddle Dum --- skibummer ( 2005-06-19 20:14 ) ( 595 bytes ) link +2   Re: Twiddle dee and Twiddle Dum --- Silverfox ( 2005-06-21 00:59 ) ( 184 bytes ) link Ski persists in his ignorance of logic. His ego interferes with his progress. --- tatiana ( 2005-06-21 02:47 ) ( 184 bytes ) +1 Yep --- skibummer ( 2005-06-21 07:25 ) ( 118 bytes ) +2   Shoot the professor --- DWA ( 2005-06-21 11:08 ) ( 432 bytes ) +1 He's lying, DWA --- tatiana ( 2005-06-21 13:51 ) ( 411 bytes ) +2   "Logic" on a pharmacy curriculum --- DWA ( 2005-06-21 17:05 ) ( 841 bytes ) +1 When you start from a false premise --- skibummer ( 2005-06-21 18:56 ) ( 1146 bytes ) +1 Pathetic --- DWA ( 2005-06-22 18:27 ) ( 802 bytes ) +1 So I was right. --- skibummer ( 2005-06-22 22:17 ) ( 1047 bytes ) +1 My misconception fueled by immediate cases: blame the meds --- DWA ( 2005-06-23 06:38 ) ( 1410 bytes ) +1 Nope, it ain't the meds. It is just you being you --- skibummer ( 2005-06-23 22:14 ) ( 2120 bytes )   If you don't believe it, write my school. --- skibummer ( 2005-06-21 18:51 ) ( 607 bytes ) +1 You are lying. Send the transcript. --- tatiana ( 2005-06-22 15:33 ) ( 324 bytes ) +2   Counterfeit logic --- DWA ( 2005-06-22 18:20 ) ( 232 bytes ) Let me get this straight. --- skibummer ( 2005-06-22 22:03 ) ( 245 bytes ) +2 We tried this already. --- Julie D. ( 2005-06-22 23:56 ) ( 743 bytes ) +3 Skibummer insane? --- DWA ( 2005-06-23 03:06 ) ( 696 bytes ) +2 Diagnosis --- skibummer ( 2005-06-23 06:17 ) ( 580 bytes ) +2   Ornamental skicarpets --- DWA ( 2005-06-23 06:55 ) ( 1295 bytes ) +1   Silly --- skibummer ( 2005-06-23 22:24 ) ( 1658 bytes ) As ad hom goes, I think passive agressive effeminate low etc isn't bad --- tatiana ( 2005-06-23 14:34 ) ( 113 bytes ) +1 Re: As ad hom goes, I think passive agressive effeminate low etc isn't bad --- skeptic-D ( 2005-06-23 15:56 ) ( 134 bytes ) don't you wish ! --- skeptic-D ( 2005-06-23 12:48 ) ( 1009 bytes ) Re: We tried this already. --- skibummer ( 2005-06-23 06:17 ) ( 125 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: We tried this already. --- Silverfox ( 2005-06-25 00:53 ) ( 108 bytes ) You invented the personal note from GHWB, Jules --- tatiana ( 2005-06-23 14:21 ) ( 1205 bytes ) +1 "Politics" archives from that long ago are certaintly gone. --- Julie D. ( 2005-06-23 15:31 ) ( 824 bytes ) +1 Let's go back to your original accusation above. Then you can apologize. --- tatiana ( 2005-06-24 03:20 ) ( 1486 bytes ) +1   That was a well-disguised concession. --- Julie D. ( 2005-06-24 20:37 ) ( 883 bytes ) link Alsheimer's is Alzheimer's misspelled. --- tatiana ( 2005-06-23 14:09 ) ( 112 bytes ) +2 Oh ho ho, I think Tatiana's Alsheimer's is escelating. --- Julie D. ( 2005-06-23 15:38 ) ( 319 bytes ) +3 Thank you for noticing. I didn't know you cared. --- tatiana ( 2005-06-23 16:01 ) ( 64 bytes ) Google says it's Alzheimers, but also uses Alsheimers. --- tatiana ( 2005-06-24 03:34 ) ( 285 bytes ) +1 Google's not a fucking dictionary! --- Julie D. ( 2005-06-24 20:43 ) ( 436 bytes )   Re: Oh ho ho, I think Tatiana's Alsheimer's is escelating. --- Silverfox ( 2005-06-25 01:05 ) ( 197 bytes )   Looks like Julie was right --- skibummer ( 2005-06-23 22:26 ) ( 1 bytes ) You didn't get an A in a logic course. --- tatiana ( 2005-06-21 13:44 ) ( 299 bytes )

TRAGEDY in the making! --- skeptic-D ( 2005-06-14 13:59 ) ( 1563 bytes ) +5 Maybe --- Crossbowman ( 2005-06-14 15:58 ) ( 2866 bytes ) +2 Re: Maybe --- skeptic-D ( 2005-06-14 18:57 ) ( 2362 bytes ) Good points --- skibummer ( 2005-06-14 19:18 ) ( 827 bytes ) +1 Re: Good points --- skeptic-D ( 2005-06-14 22:27 ) ( 1036 bytes ) State of Education --- M McKin ( 2005-06-17 15:30 ) ( 779 bytes ) link

Michael Jackson --- skibummer ( 2005-06-13 20:26 ) ( 263 bytes ) +43 Re: Michael Jackson --- Silverfox ( 2005-06-14 00:27 ) ( 616 bytes ) Re: Michael Jackson --- skeptic-D ( 2005-06-14 13:19 ) ( 1800 bytes ) +1 Those whom the gods would destroy, they first make proud --- Crossbowman ( 2005-06-14 17:00 ) ( 1166 bytes ) +3 Re: Those whom the gods would destroy, they first make proud --- skeptic-D ( 2005-06-14 19:31 ) ( 1692 bytes ) Re: Those whom the gods would destroy, they first make proud --- skibummer ( 2005-06-14 19:36 ) ( 1303 bytes ) +1 I think he knows --- Crossbowman ( 2005-06-15 19:43 ) ( 983 bytes ) +1 maybe --- skibummer ( 2005-06-15 20:37 ) ( 1834 bytes ) Two errors in your post (I am reasonably sure). --- tatiana ( 2005-06-17 09:47 ) ( 1603 bytes ) Jackson got the best justice money can buy --- tatiana ( 2005-06-14 14:13 ) ( 555 bytes ) +2 And the prosecutor got the worst possible case --- Crossbowman ( 2005-06-14 16:04 ) ( 425 bytes ) +1 That was my problem --- skibummer ( 2005-06-14 19:25 ) ( 915 bytes ) +1 It's not the sexuality of a pre-teenager. I have some experience here. --- tatiana ( 2005-06-15 10:30 ) ( 1705 bytes ) +2 Maybe he's just crazy --- Crossbowman ( 2005-06-15 19:26 ) ( 2557 bytes ) +2 You seem to understand what I was getting at. --- skibummer ( 2005-06-15 20:14 ) ( 1413 bytes ) +1 Jackson looks a lot like my pedophile friends --- tatiana ( 2005-06-16 11:37 ) ( 2413 bytes ) +2 Re: Jackson looks a lot like my pedophile friends --- Julie D. ( 2005-06-16 16:47 ) ( 2146 bytes ) +2 I wrote about 7 paragraphs in reply to yr post and accidentally dumped it. --- tatiana ( 2005-06-16 18:29 ) ( 534 bytes ) +1 Keep trying, and good luck. --- Julie D. ( 2005-06-16 18:57 ) ( 376 bytes ) Michael Jackson's looks --- tatiana ( 2005-06-16 18:59 ) ( 2944 bytes ) +2 Quite a dilemma --- Crossbowman ( 2005-06-17 00:34 ) ( 643 bytes ) +2 My favourite victim --- tatiana ( 2005-06-17 00:49 ) ( 122 bytes ) I think in a way the spirit of the laws in America would protect me --- tatiana ( 2005-06-17 01:04 ) ( 1618 bytes ) Fascinating. --- Julie D. ( 2005-06-17 15:03 ) ( 3057 bytes ) +2 I know where Louis is. He's not dead or sick. --- tatiana ( 2005-06-18 02:04 ) ( 1103 bytes ) +1 Sorry . . . . --- Julie D. ( 2005-06-23 00:05 ) ( 991 bytes ) Here's the history of the face in photos --- tatiana ( 2005-06-18 02:31 ) ( 103 bytes ) link Re: Jackson looks a lot like my pedophile friends. WHOA --- duroc ( 2007-08-30 22:39 ) ( 781 bytes ) +1 Read through the other posts in the thread --- crossbowman ( 2007-08-31 18:59 ) ( 808 bytes ) link +1 Re: Read through the other posts in the thread --- duroc ( 2007-09-03 23:47 ) ( 338 bytes ) Re: Maybe he's just crazy --- skeptic-D ( 2005-06-15 23:15 ) ( 5660 bytes ) +1 repost for Maybe he's just crazy --- skeptic-D ( 2005-06-15 23:21 ) ( 5675 bytes ) [EDIT]: Somebody please take note. --- Julie D. ( 2005-06-15 19:59 ) ( 1607 bytes ) I am curious --- skibummer ( 2005-06-14 19:08 ) ( 225 bytes ) +1 I meant that I didn't follow the trial in detail. --- tatiana ( 2005-06-15 10:41 ) ( 678 bytes ) +1 Re: I meant that I didn't follow the trial in detail. --- skibummer ( 2005-06-15 20:00 ) ( 648 bytes ) +1 I said "basic facts" and you answered as if I had said "facts" --- tatiana ( 2005-06-16 11:54 ) ( 842 bytes ) +2 Is this important? --- Julie D. ( 2005-06-16 16:21 ) ( 1396 bytes ) link +1 Is it important the ski learn what circular logic is? Could improve things here. --- tatiana ( 2005-06-17 00:44 ) ( 1043 bytes ) +2 Maybe. --- Julie D. ( 2005-06-17 15:25 ) ( 1520 bytes ) Tsk Tsk --- skibummer ( 2005-06-17 22:20 ) ( 690 bytes ) +1   Passionate cirucular arguments --- DWA ( 2005-06-18 11:08 ) ( 1111 bytes ) +1   Too too funny --- skibummer ( 2005-06-18 16:32 ) ( 219 bytes ) I know what you said it is there for all to see after all. --- skibummer ( 2005-06-17 22:26 ) ( 1896 bytes )

repost,, left somethng out, --- skeptic-D ( 2005-05-07 01:26 ) ( 4154 bytes )

as promised --- skeptic-D ( 2005-05-07 01:13 ) ( 3909 bytes )

Melanie, consider this, --- skeptic-D ( 2005-05-03 01:53 ) ( 3164 bytes ) +3 Uh.... --- Melanie ( 2005-05-05 23:15 ) ( 111 bytes ) Just read all three threads. :) --- Melanie ( 2005-05-07 20:09 ) ( 1185 bytes ) +1 Re: Just read all three threads. :) --- skeptic-D ( 2005-05-08 01:26 ) ( 4246 bytes )

Watch the Criticism! --- skeptic-D ( 2005-05-02 02:26 ) ( 3098 bytes ) +1 Dr. Benjamin Spock - sainthood, or fallible? Authoritarian or permissive? --- DWA ( 2005-05-02 10:15 ) ( 2950 bytes ) link

mentor note --- skeptic-D ( 2005-04-29 00:22 ) ( 252 bytes )

Environmental....but the paradox is demonstrated. --- Silverfox ( 2005-04-28 23:04 ) ( 142 bytes ) link

Ah no! --- Silverfox ( 2005-04-28 13:49 ) ( 212 bytes ) +5 Re: Ah no! --- skeptic-D ( 2005-04-28 18:01 ) ( 462 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: Ah no! --- Silverfox ( 2005-04-28 19:52 ) ( 466 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Ah no! --- amaranth ( 2005-05-04 16:09 ) ( 82 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: Re: Re: Ah no! --- Silverfox ( 2005-05-05 23:40 ) ( 96 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ah no! --- skeptic-D ( 2005-05-06 15:48 ) ( 263 bytes )

Five year old kid handcuffed. --- Melanie ( 2005-04-23 21:33 ) ( 1184 bytes ) link +43 Maybe --- Crossbowman ( 2005-04-24 11:08 ) ( 1305 bytes ) link +1 Re: Maybe --- Melanie ( 2005-04-24 15:54 ) ( 508 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Maybe --- skeptic-D ( 2005-04-25 04:18 ) ( 1948 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Maybe --- Melanie ( 2005-04-25 14:32 ) ( 1805 bytes ) +4 Re: Re: Re: Re: Maybe --- skeptic-D ( 2005-04-25 22:19 ) ( 946 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Re: Maybe --- skeptic-D ( 2005-04-26 02:39 ) ( 3891 bytes ) +3 Learning to gamble --- DWA ( 2005-04-27 11:11 ) ( 1254 bytes ) +1 expected from you! --- skeptic-D ( 2005-04-27 23:43 ) ( 449 bytes ) more to think about --- skeptic-D ( 2005-04-28 01:45 ) ( 3627 bytes ) +1 more on the animal trainer. --- skeptic-D ( 2005-04-28 20:40 ) ( 2814 bytes ) +1 Re: more on the animal trainer. --- skeptic-D ( 2005-04-30 01:46 ) ( 4085 bytes ) link Sorry to take so long Skeptic. --- Melanie ( 2005-05-01 21:28 ) ( 404 bytes ) +1 Re: Sorry to take so long Skeptic. --- skeptic-D ( 2005-05-02 02:54 ) ( 1308 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Re: Maybe --- skeptic-D ( 2005-04-26 14:05 ) ( 4589 bytes ) I'll add two things --- Crossbowman ( 2005-04-27 03:49 ) ( 3884 bytes ) +3 Deeper theoretical basis: instilling and reinforcing morality --- DWA ( 2005-04-27 10:57 ) ( 2322 bytes ) Re: I'll add two things --- skeptic-D ( 2005-04-27 21:17 ) ( 3456 bytes ) +1   Hey...Dr.Shmok! --- Silverfox ( 2005-04-28 13:45 ) ( 395 bytes ) +3 Re: Hey...Dr.Shmok! --- skeptic-D ( 2005-04-28 17:27 ) ( 688 bytes ) Was there some point to that gratuitous display? --- Crossbowman ( 2005-04-28 17:52 ) ( 681 bytes ) +2 Re: Was there some point to that gratuitous display? --- skeptic-D ( 2005-04-28 18:31 ) ( 1193 bytes ) +1 But, never criticise the competition? "Attachment therapy" --- DWA ( 2005-04-29 11:02 ) ( 1223 bytes ) link Re: Was there some point to that gratuitous display? --- Silverfox ( 2005-04-28 20:50 ) ( 2069 bytes ) +1   Calling all "therps", --on the carpet! --- DWA ( 2005-04-29 10:55 ) ( 561 bytes ) +1   Re: Calling all "therps", --on the carpet! --- Silverfox ( 2005-04-30 04:20 ) ( 263 bytes ) +1 Coffee jitters --- DWA ( 2005-04-30 09:13 ) ( 638 bytes ) +1   Re: Coffee jitters --- Silverfox ( 2005-04-30 10:52 ) ( 618 bytes ) +1   My chamomile tea is from Egyptian farmyards? --- DWA ( 2005-04-30 13:49 ) ( 762 bytes ) +1 Obsessed? --- skibummer ( 2005-05-01 10:09 ) ( 453 bytes ) +2 Be specific? --- DWA ( 2005-05-01 10:56 ) ( 471 bytes ) +1 Re: Be specific? --- skibummer ( 2005-05-02 07:30 ) ( 539 bytes ) link +1   Heidi's childhood playground was from Africa? Ponies under the Matterhorn? --- DWA ( 2005-05-02 12:07 ) ( 1156 bytes ) +1 Thanks --- skibummer ( 2005-05-02 13:48 ) ( 32 bytes ) +2   Utterly Frank's words --- DWA ( 2005-05-02 14:21 ) ( 660 bytes ) +1 Re: Utterly Frank's words --- skibummer ( 2005-05-02 22:01 ) ( 426 bytes )   Frankly speaking. --- Silverfox ( 2005-05-04 23:31 ) ( 81 bytes ) link Of course he's obsessed with you.... --- Melanie ( 2005-05-02 16:49 ) ( 31 bytes ) +1 Re: Of course he's obsessed with you.... --- skibummer ( 2005-05-02 22:03 ) ( 60 bytes ) +1   Damn it! --- Melanie ( 2005-05-07 21:12 ) ( 61 bytes ) SF, let me guess? --- Melanie ( 2005-05-02 16:47 ) ( 372 bytes ) +1 Re: SF, let me guess? --- Silverfox ( 2005-05-03 03:55 ) ( 1236 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: SF, let me guess? --- skeptic-D ( 2005-05-05 21:56 ) ( 2931 bytes ) Re: I'll add two things --- Melanie ( 2005-05-01 21:30 ) ( 103 bytes )

Bernice Jepson ignored those who were nice to her. --- Julie D. ( 2004-12-18 12:26 ) ( 2130 bytes ) link +5 Re: Re: Bernice Jepson ignored those who were nice to her. --- Silverfox ( 2004-12-18 20:51 ) ( 662 bytes ) +2 Well, we didn't get bitten . . . . --- Julie D. ( 2004-12-19 13:20 ) ( 155 bytes ) +2   Color Bernice GONE? --- DWA ( 2004-12-20 14:12 ) ( 824 bytes ) Re: Well, we didn't get bitten . . . . --- Melanie ( 2004-12-22 23:42 ) ( 360 bytes )   Squeeky wheel theory --- Crossbowman ( 2004-12-22 19:42 ) ( 487 bytes )

Thank You to the moderator of the board --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-14 09:04 ) ( 465 bytes )

Thank you to the moderator of the board --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-14 08:59 ) ( 496 bytes ) +51 What exactly are you talking about when you say "web address"? --- Julie D. ( 2004-12-14 19:05 ) ( 847 bytes ) +2 Victim --- DWA ( 2004-12-14 22:08 ) ( 535 bytes ) +1 Re: Victim --- skibummer ( 2004-12-15 06:55 ) ( 114 bytes ) Re: What exactly are you talking about when you say "web address"? --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-15 06:54 ) ( 202 bytes ) +1   You mean this one? --- Julie D. ( 2004-12-15 17:44 ) ( 460 bytes ) link +1 Re: You mean this one? --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-15 18:09 ) ( 157 bytes ) +1 I don't understand why you're hostile to me. --- Julie D. ( 2004-12-16 13:55 ) ( 580 bytes ) +2 Re: I don't understand why you're hostile to me. --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-16 15:44 ) ( 4 bytes ) Re: I don't understand why you're hostile to me. --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-16 15:45 ) ( 4 bytes ) +1 Re: I don't understand - and one more thing! --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-16 15:49 ) ( 4 bytes ) +1 There is another possibility --- skibummer ( 2004-12-16 21:38 ) ( 239 bytes ) +1 Re: There is another possibility- oh and another LOL --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-17 05:12 ) ( 4 bytes ) +1   Hello Mrs. Kettle --- skibummer ( 2004-12-17 07:32 ) ( 504 bytes ) +1 Re: Hello Mrs. Kettle --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-17 07:41 ) ( 4 bytes ) +2 Oh, so you're racist too. Well. Isn't that great. Hostile AND racist. --- Julie D. ( 2004-12-17 10:13 ) ( 997 bytes ) +3   Re: Oh, so you're racist too. Well. Isn't that great. Hostile AND racist. --- Silverfox ( 2004-12-17 14:19 ) ( 11 bytes ) Re: Oh, so you're racist too. Well. Isn't that great. Hostile AND racist. --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-17 16:17 ) ( 4 bytes ) +1 Then you really are crazy --- skibummer ( 2004-12-17 20:02 ) ( 253 bytes ) Aren't you glad we were there to help! --- skibummer ( 2004-12-17 19:58 ) ( 75 bytes ) Re: Re:Re: Hello Mrs. Kettle --- Silverfox ( 2004-12-17 14:18 ) ( 720 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re:Re: Hello Mrs. Kettle --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-17 16:29 ) ( 4 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Re:Re: Hello Mrs. Kettle --- skibummer ( 2004-12-17 20:04 ) ( 275 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:Re: Hello Mrs. Kettle --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-18 06:26 ) ( 4 bytes ) +1 Hello Mrs. Kettle --- skibummer ( 2004-12-18 08:34 ) ( 377 bytes ) +1 Re: Hello Mrs. Kettle --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-18 10:11 ) ( 22 bytes ) +1 Too Funny --- skibummer ( 2004-12-18 10:29 ) ( 795 bytes ) +1 Do it, Theresa. Post that e-mail address. --- Julie D. ( 2004-12-18 11:57 ) ( 809 bytes ) +1   Re:Re: Do it, Theresa. Post that e-mail address. --- Silverfox ( 2004-12-18 21:02 ) ( 881 bytes ) +2 Aw SF --- skibummer ( 2004-12-18 21:53 ) ( 208 bytes ) Wowsers! --- Julie D. ( 2004-12-19 13:27 ) ( 779 bytes ) +1 Yes, but... JulieD is plain wrong, and oversimplifies+ --- DWA ( 2004-12-19 17:18 ) ( 2613 bytes ) link +1   You just don't know how to behave. --- Julie D. ( 2004-12-19 19:39 ) ( 250 bytes ) +1   No Child Left Behind? --- DWA ( 2004-12-19 22:25 ) ( 796 bytes ) I miss all the good stuff! --- Melanie ( 2004-12-17 14:15 ) ( 143 bytes ) +2 Re: I miss all the good stuff! --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-17 16:14 ) ( 4 bytes ) +1 She almost has it right --- skibummer ( 2004-12-17 19:59 ) ( 193 bytes ) Whear ya bean, Mell? --- DWA ( 2004-12-17 19:59 ) ( 362 bytes ) +1 Re: Whear ya bean, Mell? --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-18 06:43 ) ( 1124 bytes ) +2 Re: Re: Re:Whear ya bean, Mell? --- Silverfox ( 2004-12-18 08:23 ) ( 191 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: Re: Re:Whear ya bean, Mell? --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-18 10:13 ) ( 73 bytes ) +1 So which of us is it? --- skibummer ( 2004-12-18 10:37 ) ( 504 bytes ) You are right about one thing, Theresa! --- Julie D. ( 2004-12-18 12:09 ) ( 1027 bytes ) +1   Re: You are right about one thing, Theresa! --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-19 02:30 ) ( 875 bytes ) +1 Then I want an apology --- skibummer ( 2004-12-19 10:36 ) ( 709 bytes ) +1   and an apology you shall get :) --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-20 04:29 ) ( 452 bytes ) +2 You might want to reread that --- skibummer ( 2004-12-20 18:21 ) ( 16 bytes ) +1 Re:Re: You might want to reread that --- Silverfox ( 2004-12-20 22:47 ) ( 78 bytes ) The e-mails aren't from me! --- Julie D. ( 2004-12-20 19:24 ) ( 130 bytes ) link +2   Re: Re: The e-mails aren't from me! --- Silverfox ( 2004-12-20 22:53 ) ( 340 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: Re: The e-mails aren't from me! --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-21 01:18 ) ( 117 bytes ) Re: The e-mails aren't from me! --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-21 02:02 ) ( 19 bytes )

Oh my god you people are so uncaring and REMOVE my web address IMMEDIATElY! --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-13 17:26 ) ( 4 bytes ) link img +24 Don't make a web site, if you don't want the public to see it. --- Julie D. ( 2004-12-13 18:58 ) ( 644 bytes ) +2 Remove my web address IMMEDIATELY please! --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-13 19:12 ) ( 4 bytes ) link img +1 Naive it appears you are. --- skibummer ( 2004-12-13 19:36 ) ( 206 bytes ) +1 Re: Naive it appears you are. --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-13 19:43 ) ( 19 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Naive it appears you are. --- skibummer ( 2004-12-13 22:43 ) ( 419 bytes ) +2 Non-profits file public reports? --- DWA ( 2004-12-13 22:58 ) ( 1056 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Naive it appears you are. --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-14 09:09 ) ( 19 bytes ) +1 Methinks the lady doth protest too much. --- skibummer ( 2004-12-14 11:02 ) ( 476 bytes ) +1   Re: Methinks the lady doth protest too much. --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-14 14:10 ) ( 355 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Methinks the lady doth protest too much. --- skibummer ( 2004-12-14 16:29 ) ( 341 bytes )   Re: Don't make a web site, if you don't want the public to see it. --- Eva Kiss ( 2005-06-12 19:56 ) ( 427 bytes ) +2 Re: Re: Don't make a web site, if you don't want the public to see it. --- Remi ( 2005-06-13 15:51 ) ( 436 bytes ) So...you signed up here just to call someone a pig over a 6-month old post? --- Crossbowman ( 2005-06-14 14:59 ) ( 2529 bytes ) link +2 Damn. I have said it before --- skibummer ( 2005-06-14 19:11 ) ( 245 bytes ) +1 Re: Damn. I have said it before --- skeptic-D ( 2005-06-14 22:06 ) ( 314 bytes ) Thank you. --- Julie D. ( 2005-06-14 20:29 ) ( 130 bytes ) If you are ready to calm down and think --- skibummer ( 2004-12-13 19:27 ) ( 2331 bytes ) link +2 Re: If you are ready to calm down and think --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-13 19:48 ) ( 457 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: If you are ready to calm down and think --- skibummer ( 2004-12-13 22:46 ) ( 560 bytes )   Re: Re:If you are ready to calm down and think --- Silverfox ( 2004-12-14 22:28 ) ( 474 bytes ) +1   Let the truth be known --- DWA ( 2004-12-14 23:01 ) ( 581 bytes ) +1   Re:Re: Let the truth be known --- Silverfox ( 2004-12-16 12:59 ) ( 512 bytes ) +1 Rivers or eyes of fire in Ohio? --- DWA ( 2004-12-16 17:01 ) ( 615 bytes ) +1 Not an urban legend --- skibummer ( 2004-12-16 21:42 ) ( 863 bytes ) link

Stupidity rules. --- Silverfox ( 2004-12-11 01:14 ) ( 164 bytes ) link +10 Is there a full bio sketch and institutional record of Bernice available? --- DWA ( 2004-12-12 12:37 ) ( 4451 bytes ) link +1   Re: Is there a full bio sketch and institutional record of Bernice available? --- Silverfox ( 2004-12-13 13:11 ) ( 15 bytes ) +1 The basic challenge for Bernice..... --- DWA ( 2004-12-13 22:32 ) ( 621 bytes ) Grammer and spelling corrected, things happen --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-13 17:31 ) ( 516 bytes ) link img +1 Aww, jeez . . . . --- Julie D. ( 2004-12-13 18:51 ) ( 1363 bytes ) +1 Remove my web address IMMEDIATELY please! --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-13 19:18 ) ( 144 bytes ) link img Remove my web address IMMEDIATELY please! --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-13 18:41 ) ( 115 bytes ) link img +1 Ms. Pot meet Mr. Black --- skibummer ( 2004-12-13 19:33 ) ( 333 bytes ) +1 you wish you were Mr. Black LOL too funny!!!! --- Theresa A. Niksick Forsythe ( 2004-12-13 19:41 ) ( 360 bytes ) link img +1 You do --- skibummer ( 2004-12-13 22:40 ) ( 483 bytes )