| I think in a way the spirit of the laws in America would protect me | |||
| Re: Quite a dilemma -- Crossbowman | Post Reply | ![]() |
Forum |
|
Posted by: tatiana 06/17/2005, 01:04:14 (About author)
Edit |
There is a law that says you don't have to testify against your family. Louis was not my family, but the repercussions would very likely have come down upon my family, that is on Stuff and therefore on me. I say the SPIRIT of AMerican law, not the letter of the law. His castle was notorious as a wild hangout for sexually degenerate useless aristocrats. A major country's ambassador (closet gay) was nearly killed there in an auto accident on an icy road. Of course, the story got twisted fifty ways about how he got hurt, and it looked sordid in the tabloids. In reality, our place was healthy and happy, a dream come true for me, because of the friends, the parties, the grounds, the plans, the travels together. Stuff's castle had me as the "lady" of the house and we included some gay people, I suppose it was lots of them and some artsy types. "Artsy" may be an understatement. Stuff and I (and various changing boys) were indeed an odd and notorious family about town. But the kinky, bizarre things people imagined simply didn't happen. No orgies. Few drugs. Sure there was adult consensual sex of various permutations, hardly extreme. Louis and another woman were the bad apples, the pedophiles. I didn't know that at first. I think the town considered homosex and pedophilia about the same, with possibly more tolerance for pedophilia, if the child wasn't too young. 12 was OK. Below that was questionable. Stuff was conservative in ways hardly imaginable to most people. He would not allow me to leave him alone in a room with a young boy, as if he were protecting not only the young boy, but his honour. |
| Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert |
|
Previous | Next | Current page |