Yep
Re: Ski persists in his ignorance of logic. His ego interferes with his progress. -- tatiana	Post Reply		Forum

Posted by: skibummer 06/21/2005, 07:25:15  (About author) Edit

Took it and got an A in fact. Good thing you didn't make that bet. You would be out a lot of money. IF you paid up.

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert

Previous | Next | Current page

Followups

Shoot the professor --- DWA ( 21-06-2005 ) ( 432 bytes ) +1 He's lying, DWA --- tatiana ( 21-06-2005 ) ( 411 bytes ) +2   "Logic" on a pharmacy curriculum --- DWA ( 21-06-2005 ) ( 841 bytes ) +1 When you start from a false premise --- skibummer ( 21-06-2005 ) ( 1146 bytes ) +1 Pathetic --- DWA ( 22-06-2005 ) ( 802 bytes ) +1 So I was right. --- skibummer ( 22-06-2005 ) ( 1047 bytes ) +1 My misconception fueled by immediate cases: blame the meds --- DWA ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 1410 bytes ) +1 Nope, it ain't the meds. It is just you being you --- skibummer ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 2120 bytes )   If you don't believe it, write my school. --- skibummer ( 21-06-2005 ) ( 607 bytes ) +1 You are lying. Send the transcript. --- tatiana ( 22-06-2005 ) ( 324 bytes ) +2   Counterfeit logic --- DWA ( 22-06-2005 ) ( 232 bytes ) Let me get this straight. --- skibummer ( 22-06-2005 ) ( 245 bytes ) +2 We tried this already. --- Julie D. ( 22-06-2005 ) ( 743 bytes ) +3 Skibummer insane? --- DWA ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 696 bytes ) +2 Diagnosis --- skibummer ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 580 bytes ) +2   Ornamental skicarpets --- DWA ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 1295 bytes ) +1   Silly --- skibummer ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 1658 bytes ) As ad hom goes, I think passive agressive effeminate low etc isn't bad --- tatiana ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 113 bytes ) +1 Re: As ad hom goes, I think passive agressive effeminate low etc isn't bad --- skeptic-D ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 134 bytes ) don't you wish ! --- skeptic-D ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 1009 bytes ) Re: We tried this already. --- skibummer ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 125 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: We tried this already. --- Silverfox ( 25-06-2005 ) ( 108 bytes ) You invented the personal note from GHWB, Jules --- tatiana ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 1205 bytes ) +1 "Politics" archives from that long ago are certaintly gone. --- Julie D. ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 824 bytes ) +1 Let's go back to your original accusation above. Then you can apologize. --- tatiana ( 24-06-2005 ) ( 1486 bytes ) +1   That was a well-disguised concession. --- Julie D. ( 24-06-2005 ) ( 883 bytes ) link Alsheimer's is Alzheimer's misspelled. --- tatiana ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 112 bytes ) +2 Oh ho ho, I think Tatiana's Alsheimer's is escelating. --- Julie D. ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 319 bytes ) +3 Thank you for noticing. I didn't know you cared. --- tatiana ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 64 bytes ) Google says it's Alzheimers, but also uses Alsheimers. --- tatiana ( 24-06-2005 ) ( 285 bytes ) +1 Google's not a fucking dictionary! --- Julie D. ( 24-06-2005 ) ( 436 bytes )   Re: Oh ho ho, I think Tatiana's Alsheimer's is escelating. --- Silverfox ( 25-06-2005 ) ( 197 bytes )   Looks like Julie was right --- skibummer ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 1 bytes ) You didn't get an A in a logic course. --- tatiana ( 21-06-2005 ) ( 299 bytes )