If you don't believe it, write my school.

If you don't believe it, write my school.
Re: He's lying, DWA -- tatiana	Post Reply		Forum

Posted by: skibummer
06/21/2005, 18:51:47

(About author)

Edit

You noticed before how he applied the terms of logic incorrectly. So did I and probably some others. He doesn't know the basic definitions.

Relax Tat. I am not going to hit you up for the money. LOL

If I go to the trouble of getting a transcript and mailing it to you, will you promist to go away for awhile?

I want to see a scan of his university transcript. I'll bet you a hundred bucks there is no logic course. No university is that bad.

Hmm, hundred bucks is nothing to you. Make it $10,000 and I will go to the effort. And of course it isn't bad, the university did a good job.

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert

Previous | Next | Current page

Followups

You are lying. Send the transcript. --- tatiana ( 22-06-2005 ) ( 324 bytes ) +2
- Counterfeit logic --- DWA ( 22-06-2005 ) ( 232 bytes )
- Let me get this straight. --- skibummer ( 22-06-2005 ) ( 245 bytes ) +2
  - We tried this already. --- Julie D. ( 22-06-2005 ) ( 743 bytes ) +3
    - Skibummer insane? --- DWA ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 696 bytes ) +2
      - Diagnosis --- skibummer ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 580 bytes ) +2
        
        Ornamental skicarpets --- DWA ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 1295 bytes ) +1
        
        Silly --- skibummer ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 1658 bytes )
        
        As ad hom goes, I think passive agressive effeminate low etc isn't bad --- tatiana ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 113 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: As ad hom goes, I think passive agressive effeminate low etc isn't bad --- skeptic-D ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 134 bytes )
      - don't you wish ! --- skeptic-D ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 1009 bytes )
    - Re: We tried this already. --- skibummer ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 125 bytes ) +1
      - Re: Re: We tried this already. --- Silverfox ( 25-06-2005 ) ( 108 bytes )
    - You invented the personal note from GHWB, Jules --- tatiana ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 1205 bytes ) +1
      - "Politics" archives from that long ago are certaintly gone. --- Julie D. ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 824 bytes ) +1
        
        Let's go back to your original accusation above. Then you can apologize. --- tatiana ( 24-06-2005 ) ( 1486 bytes ) +1
        
        That was a well-disguised concession. --- Julie D. ( 24-06-2005 ) ( 883 bytes ) link
  - Alsheimer's is Alzheimer's misspelled. --- tatiana ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 112 bytes ) +2
    - Oh ho ho, I think Tatiana's Alsheimer's is escelating. --- Julie D. ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 319 bytes ) +3
      - Thank you for noticing. I didn't know you cared. --- tatiana ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 64 bytes )
      - Google says it's Alzheimers, but also uses Alsheimers. --- tatiana ( 24-06-2005 ) ( 285 bytes ) +1
        
        Google's not a fucking dictionary! --- Julie D. ( 24-06-2005 ) ( 436 bytes )
      - Re: Oh ho ho, I think Tatiana's Alsheimer's is escelating. --- Silverfox ( 25-06-2005 ) ( 197 bytes )
    - Looks like Julie was right --- skibummer ( 23-06-2005 ) ( 1 bytes )