Child Abuse

Couple or three points
Re: Re: Hahaha? -- duroc Post Reply Top of the thread Forum
Posted by: crossbowman
08/31/2007, 18:45:21

Author Profile (About author)

Edit
1. There's nothing precisely wrong with spanking, when it's sensibly done. It's effective, but it's just not the most effective strategy. And, reserving it as the "ultimate penalty" for only the worst of the worst offenses gives it a bit more impact when you have to use it. Like the government, I prefer to divide my childrens' misdeeds into misdemeanors and felonies. One does not draw the "ultimate penalty" for minor infractions.

2. Sit the child down and explain FIRST, then spank. You want him thinking about what he did while you're spanking, which means you've got to make it very clear up front, not after. Nothing wrong with a lecture after to reinforce the point, but explain before spanking please. And, if you do it in that order, then you will never need to worry about taking it too far, because you will have calmed a bit by the time you get the explanation out and get to the actual spanking. No silly Protective Service worker will ever question you if you tell them you're doing it that way (assuming of course you're talking about your own child - I'd never lay hands on someone else's child).

3. As my grandma taught me early on, "Never strike a child upon the face. Nature has provided a better place."

I'd sooner a child resorts to fists than be bullied as well, but I'd prefer the child understand that his fists are for self-defense, not punishing others. Both of my school-age kids have been involved in school fights, and to be honest both swung first. I'm kind of proud of the reasons why - they were both defending friends from bullies - but I'm not exceptionally proud of their judgment in swinging first. (C'mon, how hard is it to get a bully to take the first swing?)

"Robbins’s claim fails because the Hobbs Act does not apply when the National Government is the intended beneficiary of the allegedly extortionate acts."

WILKIE ET AL. v. ROBBINS. David H. Souter, Justice, U.S. Supreme Court
with John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy,
Clarence Thomas, Stephen Breyer, and Samuel Alito concurring.


Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert Where am i? Original Post Top of the thread Previous | Next | Current page
Followups

Child Abuse