Sorry

Sorry
Re: You may want to clean up your post -- skibummer	Post Reply		Forum

Posted by: Boris
10/27/2005, 22:53:35

(About author)

Edit

SKB,
I was posting in haste, as this was during my workday, and my time was very limited. I apologize for the mess that I posted, and I noticed it only hours after the fact.

Also, FYI, "INTERBREEDING" is correct. While "inbreeding is not wrong either, INTERBREEDING means to breed within a closed population. I picked up that word when I was doing some research on the "Ostrich People" in Africa, who have a genetic defect, which deformed the feet of most of the particular tribe.

Because of the confusion, I propose that we start over.

I think you have the idea that you can replace the chromosomes in a unified conception making it only ONE set. This is not possible with our present knowledge with altering chromosomes
Boris

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert

Previous | Next | Current page

Followups

Re: Sorry --- skibummer ( 28-10-2005 ) ( 2072 bytes ) +1
- Re: Re: Sorry --- Boris ( 29-10-2005 ) ( 1752 bytes ) +2
  - Trying to catch up: Summary? First cousin marriage is better. --- DWA ( 29-10-2005 ) ( 542 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Trying to catch up: Summary? First cousin marriage is better. *CORRECT* --- Boris ( 29-10-2005 ) ( 235 bytes ) +1
      - Mysterious error correction mechanisms in DNA --- DWA ( 29-10-2005 ) ( 1508 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Mysterious error correction mechanisms in DNA... Basically correct. --- Boris ( 30-10-2005 ) ( 689 bytes ) +1
        
        I think most agree --- skibummer ( 30-10-2005 ) ( 1287 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: I think most agree --- Boris ( 30-10-2005 ) ( 774 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Re: I think most agree --- skibummer ( 30-10-2005 ) ( 625 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Re: Re: I think most agree *** I did say so. --- Boris ( 30-10-2005 ) ( 458 bytes ) +1
        
        Perhaps you meant to --- skibummer ( 31-10-2005 ) ( 1525 bytes ) link
  - Progress? --- skibummer ( 29-10-2005 ) ( 1076 bytes )