Bold faced claims of lies: conceit?+ --- DWA ( 04/10/2008, 13:45:13 ) ( 890 bytes ) link

Philosopher Jokes --- DWA ( 04/04/2008, 18:40:02 ) ( 656 bytes ) link

Authenticity, dialogue, and reciprocity --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/06/2008, 08:30:04 ) ( 1472 bytes ) link +3   Re: Authenticity, dialogue, and reciprocity --- Silverfox ( 03/06/2008, 09:07:04 ) ( 1337 bytes ) link +2   Re: Re: Authenticity, dialogue, and reciprocity --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/06/2008, 09:32:19 ) ( 853 bytes ) link Re: Re: Authenticity, dialogue, and reciprocity --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/09/2008, 10:04:08 ) ( 1046 bytes )

Simon Bartholomew's post --- Remi ( 03/01/2008, 15:12:59 ) ( 1796 bytes ) +36 Re: Simon Bartholomew's post --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/01/2008, 16:02:14 ) ( 2305 bytes ) link +3 Indian wars of American west, & Partition of India -- drastic? Post WWI, WWII --- DWA ( 03/01/2008, 22:55:39 ) ( 2618 bytes ) +2 Re: ... on path to dialogicly shared, intuited, said & verifiable verbal truth --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/02/2008, 08:14:49 ) ( 2778 bytes ) link Re: Indian wars of American west, & Partition of IndiaI --- homer ( 03/02/2008, 20:59:28 ) ( 670 bytes ) +1   Blurring boundaries, and who will buy your old house --- DWA ( 03/02/2008, 22:03:10 ) ( 435 bytes ) Re: Re: Simon Bartholomew's post --- Silverfox ( 03/01/2008, 23:39:30 ) ( 1106 bytes ) link +2 In case you don't see this! --- Silverfox ( 03/02/2008, 04:56:14 ) ( 101 bytes ) link Re: Re: Re: Simon Bartholomew's post --- Dr. Simon Bartholomew ( 03/07/2008, 23:07:06 ) ( 1276 bytes ) +2 Re: Re: Re: Re: Simon Bartholomew's post --- Silverfox ( 03/08/2008, 01:51:38 ) ( 344 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Simon Bartholomew's post --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/08/2008, 08:46:50 ) ( 3100 bytes )   Re: Re: Re: Re: Simon Bartholomew's post --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/08/2008, 08:28:29 ) ( 1417 bytes ) Re: Re: "Realists": deluded, logical, irrational, nihilistic pessimism? --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/02/2008, 07:23:03 ) ( 1973 bytes ) link +1   Re: Re: Re: "Realists": deluded, logical, irrational, nihilistic pessimism? --- Silverfox ( 03/02/2008, 10:22:44 ) ( 1085 bytes ) +2 Re: Re: Re: Re: "Realists": deluded, logical, irrational, nihilistic pessimism? --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/02/2008, 11:28:40 ) ( 3540 bytes ) link +2 The power of negative thinking is that it might be realistic --- DWA ( 03/02/2008, 22:14:07 ) ( 1686 bytes ) +2 Re: The power of rational thinking is that it creates either whooshes or insight --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/03/2008, 08:34:08 ) ( 538 bytes ) +1 Exchange rates on rice, blood, money and time+Time Management for Dummies --- DWA ( 03/03/2008, 09:06:22 ) ( 1476 bytes ) +2 Re: Exchange rates on rice, blood, money and time+Time Management for Dummies --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/03/2008, 20:13:36 ) ( 4 bytes )   Re: Time Management for Those with Good Intents ... --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/04/2008, 19:20:45 ) ( 444 bytes ) +1 Non-response can be rational, even if you are right --- DWA ( 03/04/2008, 19:34:47 ) ( 1118 bytes ) +1 Re: Non-response can be rational, even if you are right --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/04/2008, 20:09:57 ) ( 500 bytes ) img +1 Logical reasonable and rational hierarchy-ization somewhat arbitrary --- DWA ( 03/04/2008, 20:49:04 ) ( 827 bytes ) +1 Re: Logical reasonable and rational. What hierarchy? --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/05/2008, 13:48:13 ) ( 504 bytes )   Re: Rational thinking changes people's senses of reality to one more reliable --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/07/2008, 19:18:26 ) ( 839 bytes )   Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: "Realists": deluded, logical, irrational, nihilistic pessimi --- Silverfox ( 03/03/2008, 02:37:37 ) ( 3029 bytes ) +2 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: "Realists": logical, so deluded, and often nihilists --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/03/2008, 07:50:36 ) ( 3154 bytes ) +3   Whole message is a motivating commercial for mouthwash? --- DWA ( 03/03/2008, 09:15:11 ) ( 459 bytes ) +1 Re: Whole message is ...? --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/03/2008, 14:36:38 ) ( 1124 bytes ) link Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: "Realists": logical, so deluded, and often nihilists --- Silverfox ( 03/03/2008, 11:41:30 ) ( 543 bytes ) +1 Re: "Realists": logical, ergo old-hat or judgmental, nihilist outside home turf --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/03/2008, 14:13:01 ) ( 221 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: "Realists": logical, so deluded, and often nihilists --- Silverfox ( 03/03/2008, 23:59:48 ) ( 909 bytes ) +1 Re: "Realists": logical, so deluded, and often nihilists --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/04/2008, 08:03:31 ) ( 4033 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: "Realists": logical, so deluded, and often nihilists --- Silverfox ( 03/04/2008, 09:38:45 ) ( 2348 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: "Skeptical Realism": an improvement on nihilist realism ... --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/04/2008, 11:23:56 ) ( 3330 bytes ) Re: "Realists": deluded, logical, irrational, nihilistic pessimists? --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/04/2008, 19:37:00 ) ( 963 bytes )   Re: Re: Re: Re: Emancipation from realism? --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/08/2008, 14:45:52 ) ( 2735 bytes ) link

Fabricated controversy: useful concept? --- DWA ( 02/26/2008, 23:38:11 ) ( 706 bytes ) link

bank stocks that are safe in this crazy time! --- douglas hughes ( 02/21/2008, 18:09:33 ) ( 364 bytes ) link +1 Appears blatantly commercial, not at all conversational --- DWA ( 02/22/2008, 07:52:49 ) ( 1 bytes )

Occam's blunt ecclesiasticism can't cut TT's mustard ... --- Angus Cunningham ( 02/10/2008, 09:55:46 ) ( 1583 bytes ) +7 Darwinism fails all of Sagan's criteria except Occam's Razor? --- DWA ( 02/10/2008, 11:48:27 ) ( 1263 bytes ) +1   Re: Darwinism is an "ism", isn't it ? Occamic Vinegar ... --- Angus Cunningham ( 02/10/2008, 12:22:50 ) ( 1637 bytes ) link +1   The hyperbolic bandwagon meritocracy league --- DWA ( 02/10/2008, 19:57:31 ) ( 1219 bytes ) +2   Re: The hyperbolic bandwagon meritocracy league --- Remi ( 02/18/2008, 18:17:21 ) ( 26 bytes )   Re: Holding two perspectives gives stereoscopic vision, eliminating sterotypes --- Angus Cunningham ( 02/19/2008, 18:00:36 ) ( 3137 bytes ) +1 Pure democracy does not work well with some selfish people --- DWA ( 02/19/2008, 19:32:12 ) ( 4396 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: Free human beings scholarly responsive in English? --- Angus Cunningham ( 02/19/2008, 20:17:08 ) ( 369 bytes )

Are WWE fans Sexists? --- fahjiade ( 02/08/2008, 02:11:08 ) ( 267 bytes ) +1   Women wrestlers and weight limits in South Carolina --- DWA ( 02/09/2008, 11:58:28 ) ( 488 bytes )

Syllogisms: Are humans animals? --- DWA ( 01/23/2008, 14:27:06 ) ( 889 bytes ) link

Would/could any vegetarian devour a foetus? --- DWA ( 01/19/2008, 18:11:20 ) ( 269 bytes )

Carl Sagan and Occam's Razor in his baloney-spotting kit --- Angus Cunningham ( 01/06/2008, 20:33:27 ) ( 502 bytes ) +39   Getting the ball/grape/baloon/sphere/globe rolling --- DWA ( 01/07/2008, 11:32:04 ) ( 590 bytes ) +1   Re: Occam's Razor and K.I.S.S. --- Angus Cunningham ( 01/07/2008, 13:59:23 ) ( 1025 bytes ) +1   Phrases unlikely to sway the debating Wilkinson sword judges --- DWA ( 01/08/2008, 12:18:00 ) ( 567 bytes ) It's really quite simple. --- crossbowman ( 01/17/2008, 12:30:01 ) ( 1028 bytes ) +2 Oversimplification short cuts don't have to work --- DWA ( 01/18/2008, 01:39:24 ) ( 885 bytes ) +1 Nice try --- crossbowman ( 01/18/2008, 15:10:23 ) ( 2459 bytes ) +1 "Lazy Boy" clean Scout Ranch --- DWA ( 01/18/2008, 18:25:27 ) ( 870 bytes ) +1   Re: Ecclesiasticism in Occamic KISS razors --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/01/2008, 12:51:07 ) ( 265 bytes )   Re: How simple? --- Angus Cunningham ( 01/18/2008, 07:31:14 ) ( 1831 bytes ) +2 Bose-Einstein Condensed State on Angus qua particle is Achievable?+ --- DWA ( 01/18/2008, 11:46:59 ) ( 2344 bytes ) link +2 Re: Bose-Einstein Condensed State on Angus qua particle is Achievable?+ --- Angus Cunningham ( 01/18/2008, 12:31:48 ) ( 1777 bytes ) +2   doubled --- DWA ( 01/18/2008, 13:07:50 ) ( 1 bytes )   Let the biggest blarney do the chores on the TT Doubting forums? --- DWA ( 01/18/2008, 13:10:57 ) ( 957 bytes ) +1 Don't confuse blarney and Bologna --- crossbowman ( 01/18/2008, 19:02:00 ) ( 1228 bytes ) +1 I love Polish sausage --- DWA ( 01/18/2008, 22:08:03 ) ( 531 bytes ) And your point would be? --- crossbowman ( 01/18/2008, 17:37:50 ) ( 544 bytes ) It kind of depends on what you're hypothesizing. --- crossbowman ( 01/18/2008, 16:24:35 ) ( 1011 bytes ) +1   Re: It kind of depends on what WHO is hypothesizing. --- Angus Cunningham ( 01/19/2008, 14:52:42 ) ( 2033 bytes ) link +1 A shot in the dark here last night --- DWA ( 01/19/2008, 22:10:41 ) ( 686 bytes ) link +1   Re: A shot in the dark here last night --- Angus Cunningham ( 01/20/2008, 08:58:57 ) ( 1262 bytes ) link +1   DWA demands his haggis and oats freshly cooked&servedby the sig. other --- DWA ( 01/20/2008, 13:20:49 ) ( 507 bytes ) +1   Re: DWA demands his haggis and oats freshly cooked&servedby the sig. other --- Angus Cunningham ( 01/20/2008, 15:39:57 ) ( 536 bytes ) link +1 Encyclopaedic preserves and links for support --- DWA ( 01/20/2008, 17:16:34 ) ( 460 bytes ) +1   Re: Biological Evolution or biorational evolution? Serious reprise. --- Angus Cunningham ( 01/20/2008, 17:56:18 ) ( 1448 bytes ) +1 Since this is so. So, now, your turn back on the Totemizer pedals. --- DWA ( 01/21/2008, 14:58:07 ) ( 972 bytes ) link +1 Re: Since this is so. So, now, your turn back on the Totemizer pedals. --- Angus Cunningham ( 01/21/2008, 16:07:39 ) ( 304 bytes ) +1 A job for Clueso? Respekfooly disagree. --- DWA ( 01/21/2008, 23:16:49 ) ( 361 bytes ) +1 Re: A job for Clueso? Respekfooly disagree. --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/06/2008, 19:16:56 ) ( 1492 bytes ) +1 Angus' convoluted toady constructions --- DWA ( 03/06/2008, 21:03:02 ) ( 1215 bytes ) +1   Re: The verdict: ... --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/06/2008, 23:37:24 ) ( 324 bytes ) +1 Flabby palmed legerdemain: Cite your statutes ==>mens rea --- DWA ( 03/07/2008, 10:51:57 ) ( 895 bytes ) +1   Re: doing it before birth? --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/07/2008, 14:02:22 ) ( 2531 bytes ) +1 Bemused demure is mildly titillated and appreciates free ice cream samples, too. --- DWA ( 03/07/2008, 19:33:15 ) ( 947 bytes ) +1   Re: Bemused demure is mildly titillated, appreciates free ice cream samples, too --- Angus Cunningham ( 03/07/2008, 20:43:27 ) ( 1906 bytes )   Re: Carl Sagan and Occam's Razor in his baloney-spotting kit --- Angus Cunningham ( 01/18/2008, 14:38:01 ) ( 626 bytes ) +1   Position statement begs for qualification on Occam: Not 100% valid, no --- DWA ( 01/18/2008, 18:10:48 ) ( 871 bytes ) +2   Re: Position statement begs for qualification on Occam: Not 100% valid, no --- Angus Cunningham ( 01/18/2008, 18:19:59 ) ( 535 bytes ) +1   Computer tested determination- --- DWA ( 01/18/2008, 22:15:14 ) ( 402 bytes )   Re: Position statement begs for qualification on Occam: Not 100% valid, no --- Angus Cunningham ( 01/19/2008, 10:27:38 ) ( 1698 bytes )

Definition of "post hoc, ergo propter hoc" --- James M. Martin ( 12/23/2007, 16:37:05 ) ( 907 bytes ) +4 Imagination as an assist to logical thinking = thought experiment? --- DWA ( 12/24/2007, 11:11:06 ) ( 423 bytes ) We seem to be wired for that mistake. --- crossbowman ( 12/24/2007, 12:07:10 ) ( 1062 bytes ) +2   Removing all doubt: feeding/caring for our animal anxieties --- DWA ( 12/25/2007, 06:11:34 ) ( 698 bytes )   Re: We seem to be wired for that mistake. --- Angus Cunningham ( 02/10/2008, 16:24:32 ) ( 2483 bytes ) link

Maw and Order, The Spector Spectre --- homer ( 09/01/2007, 00:40:37 ) ( 1070 bytes ) +2   Re: Maw and Order, The Spector Spectre --- Silverfox ( 09/27/2007, 12:35:58 ) ( 280 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Maw and Order, The Spector Spectre --- homer ( 09/28/2007, 00:59:11 ) ( 333 bytes )

law and order --- david shebib ( 08/28/2007, 11:10:10 ) ( 25 bytes ) +11 Pathetic, ain't it? --- DWA ( 08/29/2007, 09:25:05 ) ( 20 bytes ) Re: law and order --- david shebib ( 08/29/2007, 21:51:15 ) ( 401 bytes ) +1 Harmonizing the environment to humanity --- DWA ( 08/30/2007, 03:51:03 ) ( 289 bytes ) +2 It is entirely unpredictable. --- crossbowman ( 08/30/2007, 16:14:20 ) ( 1348 bytes ) +1   Re: The timing of harmful outcomes --- Angus Cunningham ( 01/07/2008, 09:27:24 ) ( 888 bytes ) Re: Harmonizing the environment to humanity --- david shebib ( 08/31/2007, 10:28:24 ) ( 292 bytes ) +1   Weeds that can be eaten raw at point of production by housecat hosts --- DWA ( 08/31/2007, 11:02:05 ) ( 1447 bytes ) +1 I see --- crossbowman ( 08/31/2007, 18:15:28 ) ( 913 bytes ) +1 Jimson weed --- DWA ( 09/01/2007, 03:32:01 ) ( 317 bytes ) link +2 Re: Jimson weed --- homer ( 09/18/2007, 02:40:50 ) ( 379 bytes ) Re: Jimson weed --- Silverfox ( 09/27/2007, 12:42:35 ) ( 127 bytes ) link

law and order --- david shebib ( 08/28/2007, 11:09:44 ) ( 25 bytes ) +9 The law is out of order... --- crossbowman ( 08/29/2007, 15:07:24 ) ( 139 bytes ) +2 Re: The law is out of order... --- david shebib ( 08/29/2007, 21:36:06 ) ( 334 bytes ) +1 Law is not a cure-all panacea --- DWA ( 08/30/2007, 03:45:28 ) ( 703 bytes ) +1 How very elitist of you --- crossbowman ( 08/30/2007, 15:52:37 ) ( 534 bytes ) +1 Re: How very elitist of you --- david shebib ( 08/31/2007, 10:39:36 ) ( 285 bytes ) +2 Law for whose benefit? Pride, and greed. --- DWA ( 08/31/2007, 11:14:42 ) ( 699 bytes ) Elitist rabble?? --- crossbowman ( 08/31/2007, 17:26:54 ) ( 1094 bytes ) +1 Re: Elitist rabble?? --- homer ( 08/31/2007, 23:50:12 ) ( 718 bytes ) Re: The law is out of order... --- homer ( 09/27/2007, 00:49:37 ) ( 319 bytes )

Government approval --- homer ( 08/07/2007, 01:52:43 ) ( 1023 bytes ) +2   Tobacco came grandfathered in, before enlarged science and exercise --- DWA ( 08/08/2007, 22:20:42 ) ( 674 bytes ) +1 Re: Tobacco came grandfathered in, before enlarged science and exercise --- homer ( 08/10/2007, 16:54:34 ) ( 239 bytes )

smoking --- sammykittyrachel ( 07/02/2007, 10:57:41 ) ( 119 bytes ) +12 This is what I think. --- Crossbowman ( 07/03/2007, 02:34:04 ) ( 1041 bytes ) +3   Immorality/amorality is a "threat" to society in general --- DWA ( 07/04/2007, 05:39:43 ) ( 1185 bytes ) +1 "No man is an island..." --- Crossbowman ( 07/06/2007, 00:16:15 ) ( 486 bytes ) +1 Answer for those with bugs stuck in the teeth --- DWA ( 07/06/2007, 04:01:29 ) ( 579 bytes ) +1   Re: Answer for those with bugs stuck in the teeth --- Silverfox ( 07/07/2007, 03:50:08 ) ( 1026 bytes ) link +1 Doogooders a bane on society and their mashed brains --- DWA ( 07/07/2007, 20:08:59 ) ( 349 bytes ) +1 Re: Doogooders a bane on society and their mashed brains --- Hanbury Hampden-Turner ( 08/06/2007, 06:39:55 ) ( 490 bytes ) +1   Lemons into triage lemonade carrion --- DWA ( 08/07/2007, 19:37:27 ) ( 1163 bytes ) Re: This is what I think. --- homer ( 07/07/2007, 04:11:16 ) ( 1030 bytes ) +1 Anglo Saxons migrating across the Rhine towards England --- DWA ( 07/07/2007, 20:35:26 ) ( 505 bytes ) +1 Re: Anglo Saxons migrating across the Rhine towards England --- homer ( 07/11/2007, 02:20:20 ) ( 218 bytes )   Re: This also is what I think. --- Angus Cunningham ( 01/07/2008, 09:54:49 ) ( 2010 bytes )

Wikipedia article on debate shows multiple approaches --- DWA ( 05/04/2007, 23:54:26 ) ( 329 bytes ) link

Debating Rules Model at another forum --- DWA ( 09/13/2006, 11:15:05 ) ( 1896 bytes ) link

Polemics: the role of sweeping categorical statements --- DWA ( 07/11/2006, 12:42:03 ) ( 1355 bytes ) link +4 Re: Polemics: the role of sweeping categorical statements --- homer ( 09/23/2006, 18:12:49 ) ( 107 bytes ) +1 Fear of the unknown, unseen? --- DWA ( 09/24/2006, 08:30:29 ) ( 987 bytes ) +1 Re: Fear of the unknown, unseen? --- homer ( 11/22/2006, 02:39:36 ) ( 1895 bytes ) +1 The building cycles of tension/relief story device. Just deserts? --- DWA ( 11/23/2006, 05:53:30 ) ( 1545 bytes )

To use a dwa technique --- skibummer ( 06/13/2006, 17:17:54 ) ( 4934 bytes ) link +27 More specifics would be telling. Fruited restricted inquiries? --- DWA ( 06/16/2006, 14:04:17 ) ( 583 bytes ) +1 How low do I need to go for you? --- skibummer ( 06/17/2006, 05:04:50 ) ( 488 bytes ) +1   Barefeet foot stomping at vague Privy's --- DWA ( 06/17/2006, 12:00:48 ) ( 443 bytes ) +1 I believe Frank was correct in calling you the foot stomper. --- skibummer ( 06/19/2006, 09:57:32 ) ( 932 bytes ) +1   Stepping on toes, yes, proudly --- DWA ( 06/20/2006, 12:39:11 ) ( 1220 bytes ) +1 Stomping your feet does not equal stepping on toes --- skibummer ( 07/03/2006, 11:12:25 ) ( 2910 bytes ) +1 Was SKB really to MOCKBA? Or, actually, Tennessee? --- DWA ( 07/03/2006, 12:58:15 ) ( 677 bytes ) link +1   Do you really want to know? --- skibummer ( 07/03/2006, 20:39:55 ) ( 1539 bytes ) link +1 Skibummer Swan Song? --- DWA ( 07/03/2006, 21:20:08 ) ( 489 bytes ) +1 No answer then? We know what it means when you go off tangent! --- skibummer ( 07/04/2006, 10:04:31 ) ( 110 bytes ) +1 Unrepairable credibility? --- DWA ( 07/04/2006, 13:20:05 ) ( 70 bytes ) +1   According to the Russian native speakers it is. --- skibummer ( 07/04/2006, 13:45:25 ) ( 18 bytes ) +2 1. You heard wrong, or 2. Ludmilla was just catering to your ignorance. N/T --- DWA ( 07/04/2006, 19:46:49 ) ( 3 bytes ) +1   Riiiiiiiiight --- skibummer ( 07/05/2006, 07:06:02 ) ( 325 bytes ) +1   Da! SKB unreliable witness. --- DWA ( 07/05/2006, 10:24:31 ) ( 847 bytes ) +1   This from the man who imagines things and gives them the weight of reality --- skibummer ( 07/05/2006, 20:37:31 ) ( 1291 bytes ) +1 Heinlein on Intourist --- DWA ( 07/05/2006, 22:00:05 ) ( 946 bytes ) Re: According to the Russian native speakers it is. --- DWA ( 07/04/2006, 20:28:26 ) ( 839 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: According to the Russian native speakers it is. --- skibummer ( 07/05/2006, 20:31:33 ) ( 1684 bytes ) +1 Phrasebook and alphabet key would open some eyes --- DWA ( 07/05/2006, 23:15:14 ) ( 1046 bytes ) Re: To use a dwa technique --- homer ( 12/02/2006, 04:16:10 ) ( 204 bytes ) +2   Groggy medicated groups picking up regional dialects. How liberals spend. --- DWA ( 12/03/2006, 10:54:04 ) ( 1183 bytes ) Thank you --- skibummer ( 12/05/2006, 02:00:26 ) ( 117 bytes ) +1 Definition of censorship? --- DWA ( 12/06/2006, 08:07:07 ) ( 552 bytes ) +1 And you have just shown why I consider it an honor --- skibummer ( 12/06/2006, 19:09:29 ) ( 862 bytes ) +1 ROFLOL, Grabbing at Dog Fur --- DWA ( 12/06/2006, 23:46:47 ) ( 453 bytes ) +1 Leave the dog alone --- skibummer ( 12/08/2006, 01:39:58 ) ( 413 bytes )

Rantings, Ravings, and Shoo Fly Pie --- homer ( 05/31/2006, 23:45:17 ) ( 330 bytes ) +13 Sampling of harassed writings: What is "arguable" at an insecure censored forum --- DWA ( 06/07/2006, 23:12:09 ) ( 3770 bytes ) link +2   Such an imagination! --- skibummer ( 06/08/2006, 21:07:13 ) ( 2297 bytes ) +1   Test your reality, tool-trapped one, coming from behind, yin-yang confused --- DWA ( 06/09/2006, 11:25:31 ) ( 378 bytes ) link +1   This from the imagineering one? --- skibummer ( 06/10/2006, 13:43:00 ) ( 617 bytes ) +1 The library link is not conclusive, but influential --- DWA ( 06/10/2006, 19:57:49 ) ( 1361 bytes ) +1 Starting with a mischaracterization --- skibummer ( 06/11/2006, 08:27:33 ) ( 4170 bytes ) +1   Sour lemonade possibly less than 50% reconstituted lemon*, even in the Vatican --- DWA ( 06/11/2006, 10:24:10 ) ( 1322 bytes ) +1   Continuing with mischaracterizations I see --- skibummer ( 06/11/2006, 18:59:51 ) ( 2425 bytes ) +1 Censorship, confirm, or deny? --- DWA ( 06/11/2006, 21:21:14 ) ( 1143 bytes ) +1 Then deny I will. --- skibummer ( 06/12/2006, 06:13:08 ) ( 1586 bytes ) +1   Censuring F.'s censorship. Dictionary skills. Ext-evo showing of raw nerves --- DWA ( 06/12/2006, 06:33:27 ) ( 1674 bytes ) Freud --- homer ( 07/03/2006, 00:46:03 ) ( 692 bytes ) +1 Cultic soft sciences: Darwin followers appear to be even worse off than Freud's --- DWA ( 07/03/2006, 11:23:53 ) ( 2035 bytes ) link

More obscene molesty Frankentricks --- DWA ( 05/31/2006, 09:10:14 ) ( 4803 bytes ) link +2 Yes, Frank moderating your posts is JUST LIKE molesting you. --- Julie D. ( 06/01/2006, 14:24:59 ) ( 323 bytes ) +1   I have known/do know various omniscient pains --- DWA ( 06/02/2006, 12:27:01 ) ( 1130 bytes )

What is debate? What is a rag? --- DWA ( 05/28/2006, 12:39:09 ) ( 6226 bytes ) link +26   Your mother's skirt? --- skibummer ( 05/29/2006, 16:22:46 ) ( 437 bytes ) This forum does not identify a moderator --- Crossbowman ( 05/29/2006, 16:38:36 ) ( 2047 bytes ) +3 Frank's been a gentleman. --- Julie D. ( 05/29/2006, 19:51:25 ) ( 4072 bytes ) link +2   Yellow Franks's unsporting and oniony --- DWA ( 05/30/2006, 11:14:03 ) ( 1351 bytes ) +1 Correct me if I'm wrong... --- crossbowman ( 05/31/2006, 16:07:45 ) ( 1453 bytes ) +1 Let the vital life-imparting juices flow freely ? --- DWA ( 05/31/2006, 19:21:24 ) ( 1380 bytes ) +1 One point: --- Crossbowman ( 06/01/2006, 22:59:57 ) ( 333 bytes ) +1 Bringing out people's good/bad points and rambling questions of efficiency --- DWA ( 06/02/2006, 12:46:01 ) ( 1548 bytes ) Gentleman or not . . . --- crossbowman ( 05/30/2006, 18:13:10 ) ( 3148 bytes ) +2 Re: Gentleman or not . . . --- skibummer ( 05/30/2006, 19:23:24 ) ( 2979 bytes ) +1 Mostly true --- crossbowman ( 05/31/2006, 15:31:28 ) ( 1357 bytes ) +1 surfacing for a moment --- Frank ( 05/31/2006, 17:46:57 ) ( 1897 bytes ) +1   Frank illustrates his confusion very well: he got himself confused --- DWA ( 05/31/2006, 19:02:32 ) ( 1673 bytes ) link +1 maybe one new link in your chain of sausages --- Frank ( 05/31/2006, 20:14:48 ) ( 1693 bytes ) +1   Smoking hot turkey cyanide sausage --- DWA ( 05/31/2006, 21:46:04 ) ( 877 bytes ) +1 is that a sausage inyour pants or are you just happy to see skibummer? --- Frank ( 06/01/2006, 00:23:34 ) ( 2667 bytes ) +2 Creepy unflinching unflagging "moderator" Namibian truffle love --- DWA ( 06/01/2006, 19:54:04 ) ( 953 bytes ) +1 Re: Creepy unflinching unflagging "moderator" Namibian truffle love --- Silverfox ( 06/03/2006, 00:33:26 ) ( 132 bytes ) link   You worry me Frank --- skibummer ( 06/03/2006, 22:51:15 ) ( 696 bytes ) +2 2X --- DWA ( 06/03/2006, 23:07:46 ) ( 1 bytes ) Odd Couple are fixedly blind --- DWA ( 06/03/2006, 23:10:06 ) ( 463 bytes ) +1   Jealous? --- skibummer ( 06/04/2006, 07:30:22 ) ( 1 bytes ) <oops> --- Julie D. ( 05/30/2006, 20:29:46 ) ( 5 bytes ) Flagrant inflammism: Pathological "science" will be inherently insecure --- DWA ( 05/30/2006, 11:35:10 ) ( 1802 bytes ) well, it ain't me babe --- Frank ( 05/31/2006, 19:47:15 ) ( 6780 bytes ) +1 Got that --- Crossbowman ( 06/02/2006, 09:56:50 ) ( 144 bytes )

Industrial Society Destroys Mind and Environment --- James Wooten ( 03/26/2006, 23:19:53 ) ( 28786 bytes ) +6 Many unwarranted assumptions there --- crossbowman ( 03/27/2006, 16:31:06 ) ( 4854 bytes ) link Re: Industrial Society Destroys Mind and Environment --- Julie D. ( 03/27/2006, 19:38:06 ) ( 790 bytes ) Is there a label? Yadavism? --- DWA ( 03/28/2006, 11:05:32 ) ( 403 bytes ) Re: Industrial Society Destroys Mind and Environment --- Remi ( 03/29/2006, 03:25:21 ) ( 2265 bytes ) +2   Discovering and accepting reality is an ongoing process to be discussed --- DWA ( 03/30/2006, 11:30:39 ) ( 1233 bytes )   Re: Re: Industrial Society Destroys Mind and Environment --- Silverfox ( 03/30/2006, 21:16:02 ) ( 569 bytes )

Help is needed at TT Evo? --- DWA ( 03/17/2006, 20:23:41 ) ( 256 bytes ) link +21   Naa, Frank is doing quite well --- skibummer ( 03/19/2006, 09:52:57 ) ( 194 bytes )   Re: Help is needed at TT Evo? --- Remi ( 04/03/2006, 03:56:31 ) ( 1882 bytes ) +1   Naturalism has a "pou sto"? Baboons attack by instinct, or read strategy books? --- DWA ( 04/04/2006, 20:14:54 ) ( 4913 bytes ) link +1   Re: Naturalism has a "pou sto"? Baboons attack by instinct, or read strategy bo --- Remi ( 04/05/2006, 20:27:59 ) ( 3635 bytes ) +1   Defining fall guys, by exclusion --- DWA ( 04/06/2006, 00:32:08 ) ( 1547 bytes ) +1 Re: Defining fall guys, by exclusion --- Remi ( 04/06/2006, 09:27:55 ) ( 172 bytes ) +1   Clearing the air, thanks. Discovering berserk new territory. --- DWA ( 04/06/2006, 10:42:54 ) ( 1977 bytes ) +2   Don't be too hasty --- skibummer ( 04/06/2006, 20:52:30 ) ( 914 bytes ) +1 Your definition when you answered my original question has no legs? +add. --- DWA ( 04/06/2006, 23:26:20 ) ( 2528 bytes ) link +1 Your opinion only. --- skibummer ( 04/07/2006, 21:43:17 ) ( 1088 bytes ) +1 SKB may be right. Buried in a hole. --- DWA ( 04/08/2006, 12:25:58 ) ( 1315 bytes ) +1 Stop when you get right: --- skibummer ( 04/08/2006, 17:01:45 ) ( 1807 bytes ) +1 Quit scaring the horses+ --- DWA ( 04/08/2006, 23:23:57 ) ( 743 bytes ) +1   Again we have Mr. Kettle --- skibummer ( 04/09/2006, 08:41:57 ) ( 1775 bytes ) +1 Comma, or a period? Maggot?+ --- DWA ( 04/09/2006, 14:18:28 ) ( 1979 bytes ) link +1   How much more shrill can you get? --- skibummer ( 04/10/2006, 21:46:26 ) ( 1860 bytes ) +1 Glittering, unreal generalities. Still, a protagonist needs an antagonist --- DWA ( 04/11/2006, 00:24:27 ) ( 1498 bytes ) +1 The errors start with your post title and go on from there --- skibummer ( 04/11/2006, 21:05:08 ) ( 3717 bytes ) Y'know, Columbus got it wrong. --- Crossbowman ( 04/08/2006, 01:50:18 ) ( 808 bytes ) +2   Trouble in paradise. Beware of traveling Greeks bearing yardsticks. --- DWA ( 04/08/2006, 11:59:11 ) ( 1793 bytes ) link Re: Y'know, Columbus got it wrong. --- kit-kat ( 04/30/2007, 12:03:03 ) ( 10 bytes )

Do you think bush is doing the best job he can? --- orcslayer ( 03/15/2006, 15:12:43 ) ( 103 bytes )

respect,honesty,responsebility are they dead in today's culutre?! --- orcslayer ( 03/15/2006, 14:49:08 ) ( 2191 bytes )

Tucker Carlson on straw-maning (or, why I like Tucker Carlson) --- Julie D. ( 11/17/2005, 18:03:57 ) ( 2072 bytes ) link

How to "debate" most obnoxiously? --- DWA ( 08/10/2005, 21:10:51 ) ( 627 bytes ) link +6 Ayup --- Crossbowman ( 08/11/2005, 14:42:39 ) ( 891 bytes ) +2   Victims of censorship should show mercy? --- DWA ( 08/11/2005, 22:04:32 ) ( 478 bytes ) +1 There is no alternative --- Crossbowman ( 08/12/2005, 23:37:56 ) ( 2445 bytes ) +1   Learning stuff is a goal, but exercise is also good --- DWA ( 08/13/2005, 01:10:17 ) ( 1716 bytes )   Re: Ayup --- Silverfox ( 08/12/2005, 20:21:16 ) ( 309 bytes ) +1   Some have gone... --- Crossbowman ( 08/12/2005, 21:59:53 ) ( 100 bytes )

Abandonware Emulation --- dumbhead ( 08/10/2005, 06:07:43 ) ( 253 bytes ) +3 Warning flags --- Crossbowman ( 08/11/2005, 14:54:20 ) ( 693 bytes ) +1 Caution is good, but . . . . --- Julie D. ( 08/12/2005, 17:54:53 ) ( 2477 bytes ) +1 Caution is good --- Crossbowman ( 08/12/2005, 22:45:11 ) ( 2008 bytes )

Debating is like sex because --- DWA ( 06/23/2005, 11:54:31 ) ( 303 bytes ) link +1   Re: Debating is like sex because --- Silverfox ( 06/25/2005, 00:40:12 ) ( 77 bytes )

Plaintive call for help, understanding "circular reasoning" --- DWA ( 02/10/2005, 12:49:56 ) ( 2344 bytes ) link +1 I love how you call on me --- skibummer ( 02/11/2005, 08:19:33 ) ( 444 bytes )

what does it mean to be ladylike? --- Tomboy ( 01/27/2005, 16:49:46 ) ( 104 bytes ) +1 Re: what does it mean to be ladylike? --- dumbhead ( 08/10/2005, 06:20:34 ) ( 65 bytes )

What is the subject of the debate ?? --- Tomboy ( 01/27/2005, 16:43:35 ) ( 74 bytes )

" how would they celebrate? --- roselyn ( 01/02/2005, 20:08:42 ) ( 1887 bytes ) link img +1 Spam Alert --- skibummer ( 01/03/2005, 06:59:39 ) ( 1 bytes )

Have you all seen this personal view of 9/11 commission? --- tatiana ( 07/13/2004, 09:17:08 ) ( 13566 bytes ) +14 Nope --- skibummer ( 07/14/2004, 08:26:01 ) ( 171 bytes ) +1 Majority-endorsed -- Skibummer applauded. --- Julie D. ( 07/14/2004, 18:31:14 ) ( 600 bytes ) +1 Zero content unoriginal Brettskis flooding TT with Yellow posts --- DWA ( 07/15/2004, 06:00:46 ) ( 1721 bytes ) link +3 You are right --- skibummer ( 07/15/2004, 15:31:16 ) ( 1253 bytes ) How so?????? --- Crossbowman ( 07/16/2004, 11:32:36 ) ( 371 bytes ) +1 Open your eyes and see (major clarification/revision)+ ---