| It's really quite simple. | |||
| Re: Carl Sagan and Occam's Razor in his baloney-spotting kit -- Angus Cunningham | Post Reply | ![]() |
Forum |
|
Posted by: crossbowman 01/17/2008, 12:30:01 (About author)
Edit |
It comes down to energy and probability. In a natural setting, that which requires the least energy and the fewest random steps to occur will occur more often. A 1-in-10 shot is flatly more likely than a 1-in-a-million shot. Ten consecutive one-in-ten shots are less likely than five. And rocks generally fall down, not up. Therefore, given an event and a set of hypotheses about how that event came to be, probability dictates you are most likely to be right if you embrace the one that involves the fewest random events and the least expenditure of energy by Nature. If the rock is no longer where it was, it is more likely to have fallen down the cliff during a rainstorm than to have rolled further up the hill in dry weather. It isn't always true - perhaps a monkey got loose from the zoo, wandered by, and carried the rock up to kill a bug for lunch - but it's the safer bet, especially during the stormy season. If you want the best chance at being right, betting on the safer bet's generally a good way to go about it. "Robbins’s claim fails because the Hobbs Act does not apply when the National Government is the intended beneficiary of the allegedly extortionate acts." WILKIE ET AL. v. ROBBINS. David H. Souter, Justice, U.S. Supreme Court
with John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy,
Clarence Thomas, Stephen Breyer, and Samuel Alito concurring. |
| Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert |
|
Previous | Next | Current page |