As usual, only in dwa's opinion

As usual, only in dwa's opinion
Re: Cumulative Cyanide Toxicity: SKB Remembers Unprepared, but teaching, anyway? -- DWA	Post Reply		Forum

Posted by: skibummer
05/20/2006, 21:17:49

(About author)

Edit

Cumulative Cyanide Toxicity: SKB Remembers Unprepared, but teaching, anyway?

And that is okay with me since your standing here isn't exactly high. Witness recent comments from Frank and Rosie. Do I really need to link their comments for you?

Oka-a-a-y. Homework done. Your glib unprofessional statement is largely refuted.

Actually no, your homework isn't done. I specified Napoleon. In addition, glib applies more to you than it does to me. BTW your site is rather interesting and does have some useful info (unlike most of your posts) From your link:

There is no reported biomagnification of cyanide in the food chain.
Although chronic cyanide intoxication exists, cyanide has a low chronic toxicity. Repeated sublethal doses of cyanide seldom result in cumulative adverse effects. Many species can tolerate cyanide in substantial yet sublethal intermittent doses for long periods of time.

Hmm, although chronic cyanide intoxication exists. Enough said. I am done with you on this since if history holds you will now go into dwa mode with tangents. Although when you do (and we both know you will, I will use XRage's law and declare a win. Quite rightly

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert

Previous | Next | Current page

Followups

Cumulative cannabis toxins --- DWA ( 2006-05-21 14:53 ) ( 594 bytes ) +1
- Pay attention --- skibummer ( 2006-05-21 17:02 ) ( 532 bytes ) +1
  - Untrained in the science of drugs, then? --- DWA ( 2006-05-22 09:31 ) ( 971 bytes ) +1
    - Again, pay attention --- skibummer ( 2006-05-22 18:11 ) ( 1315 bytes ) +1
      - What's in a name? --- DWA ( 2006-05-22 21:17 ) ( 1020 bytes ) +1
        
        What indeed? --- crossbowman ( 2006-05-23 00:31 ) ( 2572 bytes ) link +2
        
        Thank you CBM --- skibummer ( 2006-05-23 07:01 ) ( 17 bytes )
        You win? --- DWA ( 2006-05-23 09:51 ) ( 1600 bytes ) +2
        
        Yes he won! --- skibummer ( 2006-05-23 20:47 ) ( 1041 bytes ) +1
        
        This probably should not be necessary, but SKB makes it so+ --- DWA ( 2006-05-24 12:12 ) ( 862 bytes ) +1
        
        Actually I don't make it so. That would be an example of your imagineering. --- skibummer ( 2006-05-24 18:36 ) ( 1310 bytes ) link
        
        You hit the mark with the alcohol --- crossbowman ( 2006-05-24 01:29 ) ( 563 bytes ) +1
        
        Thanks for your sober sanity. Is a tequila worm an animal, though? --- DWA ( 2006-05-24 12:22 ) ( 439 bytes ) +1
        
        Common mistake --- skibummer ( 2006-05-24 19:50 ) ( 750 bytes ) link +1
        
        Perriér and tequila --- DWA ( 2006-05-24 21:49 ) ( 776 bytes ) +1
        
        More imagineering? --- skibummer ( 2006-05-25 07:13 ) ( 674 bytes ) +1
        
        Quit pulque-ing my leg. Modern product beautification for the weak-stomached --- DWA ( 2006-05-25 11:14 ) ( 2504 bytes ) link +1
        
        Tomando el pelo --- skibummer ( 2006-05-25 19:08 ) ( 837 bytes ) +1
        
        Taking the hair? --- DWA ( 2006-05-25 21:14 ) ( 79 bytes )