Drugs

Punishing the "innocent" bystander/landlord is plainly bad
Re: Okay, once more -- crossbowman Post Reply Top of the thread Forum
Posted by: DWA
08/22/2007, 21:37:08

Author Profile (About author)

Edit
In the average rental agreement transaction, I'm just not sure that anybody, including wise old grannies could spot a drug freak.

Then there are those anti-discrimination property rental laws to worry about, also.

Crossbowman:"That type, they make enough income and are willing to spend for a reasonably decent house - which is what makes them scary, they show up as Joe Everyman's next door neighbor - but they don't fork out for McMansions. "

Stop, stop! You are about to make me paranoid about my hispanic neighbors and also that heavy foot traffic out on the road.

Anyway, I don't think you are answering my concerns about how easily someone's lifetime earnings, buried in a home, can be jeopardised, permanently buried by forfeiture by a mere flaky organic-chemistry savvy enterprising renter.

Are you suggesting that home forefeitures aren't really statistically or socially significant? I even see a few mysteriously unoccupiied and neglected houses hereabouts. Did they sell out to a big box marketer chain, or is it the sinister drug enforcement laws, in some cases?

Or, due to a missing heir, or a contested estate?

.
.
..
...
o
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29542
Pigs win constitutional protection
(o;
...
..
.
Cogito ergo spud: I think, therefore I yam (Yam = dolce spud)
. .

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert Where am i? Original Post Top of the thread Previous | Next | Current page
Followups

Drugs