| Punishing the "innocent" bystander/landlord is plainly bad | |||
| Re: Okay, once more -- crossbowman | Post Reply | ![]() |
Forum |
|
Posted by: DWA 08/22/2007, 21:37:08 (About author)
Edit |
In the average rental agreement transaction, I'm just not sure that anybody, including wise old grannies could spot a drug freak. Then there are those anti-discrimination property rental laws to worry about, also. Crossbowman:"That type, they make enough income and are willing to spend for a reasonably decent house - which is what makes them scary, they show up as Joe Everyman's next door neighbor - but they don't fork out for McMansions. " Stop, stop! You are about to make me paranoid about my hispanic neighbors and also that heavy foot traffic out on the road. Anyway, I don't think you are answering my concerns about how easily someone's lifetime earnings, buried in a home, can be jeopardised, permanently buried by forfeiture by a mere flaky organic-chemistry savvy enterprising renter. Are you suggesting that home forefeitures aren't really statistically or socially significant? I even see a few mysteriously unoccupiied and neglected houses hereabouts. Did they sell out to a big box marketer chain, or is it the sinister drug enforcement laws, in some cases? Or, due to a missing heir, or a contested estate? |
| Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert |
|
Previous | Next | Current page |
|