| Things you learn in the waiting room: Hi Tech to the rescue | ![]() | ||
| Re: Re: Re: Uh-Oh -- cyanidefreak | Post Reply | ![]() |
Forum |
|
Posted by: DWA 07/30/2008, 15:37:22 (About author)
Edit |
Overview/summary: The solution to global warming may be to *artificially* reduce the incoming radiation. People may be inflating the scale and gravity of the "emergency". George Bush, conveniently ripped out of context:"we ought to get beyond that debate and start implementing the technologies necessary to enable us to achieve a couple of big objectives " Reading stale magazines this morning, I saw an ad by a solid waste disposal company reporting a company in Texas that is growing algae for fuel. They are still evalating different algae strains, but the prediction there was that an acre of Southwest USofA land could produce 100,000 gallons of petroleum-type fuels per year, as compared to getting only ?20 gallons from corn. The photo showed compartmented clear plastic bags suspended on racks, holding the circulated green liquid material, in a greenhouse shelter. Elsewhere in that issue of Time, about March 2008, was a report of someone "expertly" figuring that there are technological solutions to global warming, whatever the mechanism. Namely, releasing sulfur aerosols that cause the atmosphere to whiten and reflect more solar radiation as did that Pinatubo eruption in the Philippines. Also, we could paint our roofs white. Or, fertilise the oceans with iron compounds. Or, orbit reflectors. Punch line: The price to adding sufur to the atmospere was merely in the few $billions per year range, but h-e-e-y, couldn't some of that be done by just lowering restrictive coal burning and diesel fuel standards? |
| Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert |
|
Previous | Next | Current page |
|