interesting --- skeptic-d ( 2009-11-10 18:51 ) ( 5013 bytes ) +35 Re: interesting --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-10 23:41 ) ( 51 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: interesting --- dj ward ( 2009-11-11 00:03 ) ( 270 bytes ) +2 Re: Re: Re: interesting --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-11 01:14 ) ( 408 bytes ) And it will likely go on for another 20 years --- Crossbowman ( 2009-11-12 15:24 ) ( 1318 bytes ) +1 Re: equal rights for Neanderthals --- dj ward ( 2009-11-12 18:59 ) ( 1310 bytes ) +2 Re: Re: equal rights for Neanderthals --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-13 10:19 ) ( 371 bytes ) Trade women? You're a little too modern. --- Crossbowman ( 2009-11-13 22:42 ) ( 8020 bytes ) link Source for that copy-paste --- DWA ( 2009-11-11 10:49 ) ( 89 bytes ) link +1 Re: Skep's probity probed --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-12 09:15 ) ( 474 bytes ) link +1   Re: Re: Skep's probity probed --- Remi ( 2009-11-12 10:09 ) ( 129 bytes ) +3   S-D admits today --- DWA ( 2009-11-12 11:08 ) ( 852 bytes ) link Re: Re: Re: Skep's probity probed further --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-12 15:08 ) ( 3058 bytes ) link +1 All of which basically means ... --- Crossbowman ( 2009-11-12 15:40 ) ( 635 bytes ) +1 Re: All of which basically means ... --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-12 23:15 ) ( 1605 bytes ) +3 Diagnose first, treat second, or slap a "workaholic" label on them. --- DWA ( 2009-11-12 23:58 ) ( 916 bytes ) link double- deleted --- DWA ( 2009-11-12 23:58 ) ( 2 bytes ) link Which certainly merits discussion ... --- Crossbowman ( 2009-11-13 23:21 ) ( 1117 bytes ) +1 Re: Which certainly merits discussion ... --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-14 06:25 ) ( 1157 bytes ) link +2 Breeding out anger and antipathy is progress? --- DWA ( 2009-11-14 11:16 ) ( 775 bytes ) +1 That wasn't quite what I got out of it --- Crossbowman ( 2009-11-16 23:48 ) ( 1053 bytes ) +2   My spin: Angus needs anger control more than the average "evolved" X --- DWA ( 2009-11-17 10:59 ) ( 2148 bytes ) Re: That wasn't quite what I got out of it --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-18 21:58 ) ( 243 bytes ) +1 Do public opinion polls work on Evo vs. ID? --- DWA ( 2009-11-19 11:39 ) ( 192 bytes ) +1 Re: On voxes ... --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-20 10:35 ) ( 96 bytes ) Don't overreact --- Crossbowman ( 2009-11-16 23:30 ) ( 2545 bytes )   Re: Re: Re: Skep's probity probed --- Silverfox ( 2009-11-13 03:21 ) ( 1098 bytes ) +1   Useful fools give testimony and ?compel towards the opposite themes --- DWA ( 2009-11-13 10:21 ) ( 1765 bytes ) +1   Re: Useful fools give testimony and ?compel towards the opposite themes --- Silverfox ( 2009-11-13 11:44 ) ( 294 bytes ) +1   Telling bottom feeders to go walk on solid ground & playing poker in the mist --- DWA ( 2009-11-13 23:36 ) ( 566 bytes ) +1   Re: Mist poker hand: black and red, and Waddington blue? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-14 07:18 ) ( 87 bytes ) +1   Evasive --- DWA ( 2009-11-14 11:19 ) ( 1 bytes ) Everyone seems to be missing the interesting part --- Frank ( 2009-11-18 15:27 ) ( 572 bytes ) +1   We should be preferably communicating with the selectiveTT post author ? --- DWA ( 2009-11-18 21:09 ) ( 586 bytes ) +1 any reason for bearing unbudden burdens? --- Frank ( 2009-11-18 22:45 ) ( 542 bytes ) +1 Heartily agreed --- DWA ( 2009-11-19 11:43 ) ( 516 bytes )

Mankind: Dog's ultimate intelligent design --- DWA ( 2009-11-07 21:12 ) ( 906 bytes ) link +12 Re: what have we done for digs lately? --- dj ward ( 2009-11-08 19:35 ) ( 206 bytes ) +2 Re: Re: what have we done for digs lately? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-09 07:42 ) ( 265 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: what have we done for dogs lately? --- dj ward ( 2009-11-09 16:04 ) ( 201 bytes ) +1 Press "control" key, and roll your mouse wheel to adjust font size? --- DWA ( 2009-11-09 21:49 ) ( 28 bytes ) Re: Re: what have we done for digs lately? --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-09 23:38 ) ( 511 bytes ) +1 "Too good of a pig to eat/pickle all at once." --- DWA ( 2009-11-10 11:55 ) ( 675 bytes ) +1 Re: "Too good of a pig to eat/pickle all at once." --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-10 12:22 ) ( 374 bytes ) Re: Mankind: Dog's ultimate intelligent design --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-09 13:49 ) ( 122 bytes ) +1   American aboriginal indians had dogs, no horses --- DWA ( 2009-11-10 12:00 ) ( 116 bytes ) +1 Re: American aboriginal indians had dogs, no horses --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-10 12:33 ) ( 350 bytes ) +1 Do your research! --- Crossbowman ( 2009-11-12 14:47 ) ( 842 bytes ) +1 Re: Do your research! --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-13 00:46 ) ( 270 bytes )

Micro-evolution in linguistic culture and rational emoto-linguistics --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-07 07:46 ) ( 4206 bytes ) +12 Re: Micro-evolution in linguistic culture and rational emoto-linguistics --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-07 09:59 ) ( 381 bytes ) +3 I like your rational tentativeness. Repayment in useful kind? --- DWA ( 2009-11-07 11:20 ) ( 668 bytes )   Re: Re: Micro-evolution in linguistic culture and rational emoto-linguistics --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-07 15:05 ) ( 922 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Micro-evolution in linguistic culture and rational emoto-linguistics --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-08 12:28 ) ( 612 bytes ) +1 Re: Micro-evolution in linguistic culture and rational emoto-linguistics --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-09 07:34 ) ( 2169 bytes ) link +1 Re: Re: Micro-evolution in linguistic culture and rational emoto-linguistics --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-09 13:45 ) ( 1039 bytes ) +1 DWA joins the Stakhanovite hooting --- DWA ( 2009-11-10 11:34 ) ( 728 bytes ) link +1 Re: DWA joins the Stakhanovite hooting --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-11 00:05 ) ( 79 bytes ) +1   Meaning of reality --- DWA ( 2009-11-11 10:52 ) ( 125 bytes ) +1 Re: Meaning of reality --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-11 12:16 ) ( 220 bytes ) Re: Re: Micro-evolution in linguistic culture and rational emoto-linguistics --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-12 18:38 ) ( 3010 bytes ) link +1   Topicality? --- DWA ( 2009-11-13 00:18 ) ( 998 bytes )

Two ameoba ooze into a bar --- cadizat ( 2009-11-05 16:15 ) ( 853 bytes ) +2 Passion among lay-amoebas --- DWA ( 2009-11-05 18:03 ) ( 267 bytes ) +1 Re: Passion among lay-amoebas --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-05 19:08 ) ( 56 bytes )

Can you get God out of a box? --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-11-03 21:17 ) ( 466 bytes ) link +16 Re: Can you get God out of a box? --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-03 22:19 ) ( 179 bytes ) +2 Re: Re: Can you get God out of a box? --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-11-03 23:32 ) ( 879 bytes ) link +1 Re: Re: Re: Can you get God out of a box? --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-04 08:34 ) ( 704 bytes ) Re: Re: Can you get God out of a box? --- dj ward ( 2009-11-08 19:40 ) ( 72 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Can you get God out of a box? --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-09 15:55 ) ( 136 bytes ) +1 A fresh (or replayed) insight on human's TiVo projection --- DWA ( 2009-11-10 11:46 ) ( 538 bytes ) link +2 Re: The evolution of some gods --- dj ward ( 2009-11-10 23:43 ) ( 151 bytes ) +2 Re: Re: The evolution of some gods --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-11 00:57 ) ( 214 bytes ) Time, origins, and morphic resonance --- DWA ( 2009-11-11 10:57 ) ( 367 bytes ) Re: A fresh (or replayed) insight on human's TiVo projection --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-11 00:30 ) ( 597 bytes ) +1 Re: God has x emotion now --- dj ward ( 2009-11-11 01:03 ) ( 9 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: God has x emotion now --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-11 12:24 ) ( 73 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Where is Angus when you really need him? --- dj ward ( 2009-11-12 19:16 ) ( 82 bytes ) +2 Re: Re: Re: Re: Where is Angus when you really need him? --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-15 01:42 ) ( 288 bytes ) Weaving up a Nihilist stew in/from the broken reeds/threads w/o dot connection --- DWA ( 2009-11-15 11:52 ) ( 278 bytes ) +1 snip --- Frank ( 2009-11-18 15:32 ) ( 264 bytes )

Eats shoots and leaves --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-31 23:08 ) ( 830 bytes ) +4 Tomatoes with foreskins? --- DWA ( 2009-11-01 11:00 ) ( 198 bytes ) +1 Re: Tomatoes with foreskins? --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-01 16:29 ) ( 609 bytes )   Re: Eats shoots and leaves --- Silverfox ( 2009-11-04 02:03 ) ( 696 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Eats shoots and leaves --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-04 08:41 ) ( 206 bytes )

Grafting --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-26 22:06 ) ( 324 bytes ) +2   Post foetal Prague powder cellular specialization? --- DWA ( 2009-10-27 10:12 ) ( 676 bytes ) link +1 Re: Post foetal Prague powder cellular specialization? --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-27 15:49 ) ( 187 bytes )

Olympic slogan for the next milennium? Shorter, fatter, weaker, slower! --- Frank ( 2009-10-25 21:27 ) ( 1359 bytes ) link +17 Re: Olympic slogan for the next milennium? Shorter, fatter, weaker, slower! --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-25 23:48 ) ( 193 bytes ) Intelligent designing of steroidal applications --- DWA ( 2009-10-26 08:17 ) ( 808 bytes ) +1   Frank: The Grand Designer --- Gaele ( 2009-10-28 08:57 ) ( 230 bytes ) +1   Dangers of overspecialization/overspecisesation --- DWA ( 2009-10-28 10:45 ) ( 389 bytes ) +3   Re: Dangers of overspecialization/overspecisesation --- Gaele ( 2009-10-28 11:45 ) ( 755 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Comparisons not possible but empathy is magical --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-28 15:51 ) ( 1221 bytes ) +2   Intelligent designing humans will get their enzymes --- DWA ( 2009-10-29 08:46 ) ( 565 bytes ) +1   Re: Intelligent designing humans will get their enzymes --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-29 09:32 ) ( 554 bytes )   triple bounce --- DWA ( 2009-10-29 08:47 ) ( 1 bytes ) +1   Re: caught on the third bounce in mid field --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-29 09:37 ) ( 220 bytes ) +1   Angus can go find a dark spot and Lamarckianly pleasure himself? --- DWA ( 2009-10-29 19:28 ) ( 1 bytes ) +1   Re: A distinctly Lamarckian pleasure ... --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-31 21:11 ) ( 82 bytes ) +1 Fun in the dark devolutionary Pachinko parlors? --- DWA ( 2009-10-31 21:34 ) ( 195 bytes ) Re: Dangers of overspecialization/overspecisesation --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-30 07:45 ) ( 219 bytes ) As some engineers painfully learn..... LOL --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-11-03 01:12 ) ( 550 bytes ) +2 Tried to answer you yesterday --- DWA ( 2009-11-04 09:01 ) ( 192 bytes ) Re: As some engineers painfully learn..... LOL --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-04 15:49 ) ( 84 bytes )

Streisand effect may be applicable in evolutionary commerces+ --- DWA ( 2009-10-22 22:01 ) ( 902 bytes ) link +6 Trying to reject a theory will only make it more popular --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-10-26 00:10 ) ( 1143 bytes ) +1   Re: Trying to reject a theory will only make it more popular --- Silverfox ( 2009-10-26 10:55 ) ( 453 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Trying to reject a theory will only make it more popular --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-10-28 23:40 ) ( 346 bytes ) link img +2 Re: Re: Re: Trying to reject a theory will only make it more popular --- Silverfox ( 2009-10-29 23:43 ) ( 390 bytes ) link +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: Trying to reject a theory will only make it more popular --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-31 10:18 ) ( 111 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Trying to reject a theory will only make it more popular --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-31 10:14 ) ( 126 bytes )

Dog in a car --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-19 10:36 ) ( 216 bytes ) +24   Colours of Noise --- Gaele ( 2009-10-24 20:17 ) ( 618 bytes ) link +1 Re: Colours of Noise --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-25 10:48 ) ( 1626 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: Colours of Noise --- Gaele ( 2009-10-25 14:34 ) ( 833 bytes ) +3 Re: Re: Re: Colours of Noise --- DJ Ward ( 2009-10-25 15:40 ) ( 376 bytes ) +1   Have A Cigar --- Gaele ( 2009-10-26 13:50 ) ( 438 bytes ) +2 Re: Have A Cigar --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-26 16:39 ) ( 583 bytes )   Security camera microphones are an ID'ed evolution of human senses+ --- DWA ( 2009-10-27 09:57 ) ( 728 bytes ) +1   Re: Security camera microphones are an ID'ed evolution of human senses+ --- Gaele ( 2009-10-27 13:08 ) ( 561 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Security camera microphones are an ID'ed evolution of human senses+ --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-27 21:27 ) ( 629 bytes ) +1   Forward-visioned hawks are integrated with their hydraulic systems --- DWA ( 2009-10-28 10:51 ) ( 382 bytes ) +2 Re: Forward-visioned hawks are integrated with their hydraulic systems --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-30 13:25 ) ( 94 bytes ) Re: Forward-visioned hawks are integrated with their hydraulic systems --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-30 13:25 ) ( 94 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Colours of Noise --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-25 23:40 ) ( 300 bytes ) +1   Thank You! --- Gaele ( 2009-10-26 14:44 ) ( 131 bytes ) +1 Re: Thank You! --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-26 16:58 ) ( 696 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: Thank You! --- Gaele ( 2009-10-27 12:58 ) ( 275 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Colours of Noise --- Silverfox ( 2009-10-26 11:10 ) ( 828 bytes ) link +3   Re: Re: Re: Re: Colours of Noise --- Gaele ( 2009-10-26 14:42 ) ( 967 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Re: Colours of Noise --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-26 21:52 ) ( 528 bytes ) +2 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Colours of Noise --- Silverfox ( 2009-10-28 05:12 ) ( 71 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Colours of Noise --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-31 10:29 ) ( 256 bytes ) Are we senseless or desensatized........ --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-11-03 01:45 ) ( 757 bytes ) +1 Re: Are we senseless or desensatized........Fantasy --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-03 22:33 ) ( 166 bytes ) Re: fish tracks --- DJ Ward ( 2009-10-27 05:53 ) ( 174 bytes )

Green works best? --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-18 12:09 ) ( 183 bytes ) +3 picking weeds isn't picking mates --- Frank ( 2009-10-18 23:26 ) ( 187 bytes ) +1 Re: picking weeds isn't picking mates --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-19 10:27 ) ( 460 bytes ) +1 they have no eyes, but see --- Frank ( 2009-10-21 15:47 ) ( 606 bytes )

Evolution of the balancing of an upset: the individual out from the cultural? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-17 21:54 ) ( 1017 bytes ) +14 Re: Evolution of the balancing of an upset: the individual out from the cultural --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-18 22:23 ) ( 1209 bytes ) +1 Re: Evolution of the balancing of an upset: the individual out from the cultural --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-28 21:49 ) ( 210 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Evolution of the balancing of an upset: the individual out from the cult --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-31 11:44 ) ( 506 bytes ) +2 Re: Evolution of the balancing of an upset: the individual out from the cult --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-31 21:17 ) ( 168 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Evolution of the balancing of an upset: the individual out from the cult --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-01 23:29 ) ( 1761 bytes ) Evolution of the individual --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-10-31 22:06 ) ( 1327 bytes ) +2 Learned versus instinctive behavior --- DWA ( 2009-11-01 10:33 ) ( 719 bytes ) +1 Re: Learned versus instinctive behavior --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-11-03 00:39 ) ( 2502 bytes ) +1 I suspect that you offer something worthwhile that your nephew wants --- DWA ( 2009-11-03 09:14 ) ( 196 bytes ) +1 Re: I suspect that you offer something worthwhile that your nephew wants --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-03 10:30 ) ( 641 bytes ) +1 I know how to do this --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-11-04 16:41 ) ( 301 bytes ) +1 Re: I know how to do this --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-04 21:19 ) ( 260 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: I know how to do this --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-11-05 14:44 ) ( 3092 bytes ) link Re: Evolution of the individual --- Cadizat ( 2009-11-01 22:13 ) ( 503 bytes )

If humans vanished --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-17 01:16 ) ( 354 bytes ) +2   Re: If humans vanished --- Lamplighter ( 2009-10-17 06:42 ) ( 52 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: If humans vanished --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-17 16:30 ) ( 116 bytes )

Anvil,Stirrup,Hammer --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-14 12:06 ) ( 392 bytes ) +8 Re: Anvil,Stirrup,Hammer --- Silverfox ( 2009-10-15 00:38 ) ( 75 bytes ) link +2 Large body mass elevates possible blood temperatures --- DWA ( 2009-10-15 11:42 ) ( 180 bytes ) +1 Re: Large body mass elevates possible blood temperatures --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-15 21:02 ) ( 698 bytes ) Re: Re: Anvil,Stirrup,Hammer --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-15 20:43 ) ( 477 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Anvil,Stirrup,Hammer --- Silverfox ( 2009-10-16 02:15 ) ( 1 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: Anvil,Stirrup,Hammer --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-17 16:22 ) ( 29 bytes ) Re: Anvil,Stirrup,Hammer --- DJ Ward ( 2009-10-15 12:58 ) ( 149 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Anvil,Stirrup,Hammer --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-18 11:57 ) ( 597 bytes )

Ardis takes a bite out of Dollo's Law --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-13 22:08 ) ( 1002 bytes ) +2   Intelligent designing choice of the less lethal/vicious TT Turkey --- DWA ( 2009-10-14 08:00 ) ( 1001 bytes ) +1 Re: Intelligent designing choice of the less lethal/vicious TT Turkey /T Rex --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-14 08:53 ) ( 954 bytes )

Composed while thinking of "Le Comte et La Comptesse de Bent" --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-11 13:31 ) ( 2037 bytes ) +4   I have a Bent in my ancestral line. Worried? --- DWA ( 2009-10-12 01:03 ) ( 517 bytes ) +1 Re: On Bents, etc. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-13 08:31 ) ( 742 bytes ) +1 I also worry about vegetables: (nothing "special"?) --- DWA ( 2009-10-13 10:38 ) ( 204 bytes ) +1 Re: rho's and Rho's affecting memory. Where are the columns? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-17 18:31 ) ( 344 bytes )

Darwinian struggle with Narrow AI --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-10-10 01:08 ) ( 625 bytes ) link

Ardis --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-09 21:46 ) ( 138 bytes ) +7   Neighbors, but not blood-related. --- DWA ( 2009-10-09 22:31 ) ( 684 bytes ) +1 Re: Neighbors, but not blood-related. --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-10 02:39 ) ( 351 bytes ) +1   Sierras and Cascade Mts. pulsing and uplifting in constant neo-renewal --- DWA ( 2009-10-10 10:07 ) ( 702 bytes ) +2 Re: Sierras and Cascade Mts. pulsing and uplifting in constant neo-renewal --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-10 14:54 ) ( 874 bytes )   Re: Sierras and Cascade Mts. pulsing and uplifting in constant neo-renewal --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-11 17:44 ) ( 882 bytes ) link +1 Ancestral memory a variant of Lamarckian effect, the other direction? Green TT. --- DWA ( 2009-10-12 00:53 ) ( 593 bytes ) link +1 Re: Ancestral memory a variant of Lamarckian effect, the other direction? TT --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-13 08:55 ) ( 991 bytes )

Astophagy --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-07 22:50 ) ( 819 bytes ) +12 Proteolytic enzymes supplements improve cellular-level biochemistry? --- DWA ( 2009-10-08 11:41 ) ( 608 bytes ) +1 Re: Proteolytic enzymes supplements improve cellular-level biochemistry? --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-08 23:54 ) ( 981 bytes ) +2 Your perception may be more resonant than mine on that+ *Moderated* --- DWA ( 2009-10-09 04:59 ) ( 2178 bytes ) +1 Re: Book lovers and tuning forks? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-09 05:58 ) ( 1261 bytes ) link +3 Re: Re: Book lovers and tuning forks? --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-09 13:34 ) ( 367 bytes ) Re: Re: Book lovers and tuning forks? --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-09 13:57 ) ( 897 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: Re: Book lovers and tuning forks? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-09 19:28 ) ( 334 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: Book lovers and tuning forks? --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-09 21:56 ) ( 150 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Book lovers and tuning forks? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-10 19:06 ) ( 597 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Book lovers and tuning forks? --- cadizat ( 2009-10-10 21:38 ) ( 161 bytes ) Re: Re: Book lovers and tuning forks? --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-10 15:06 ) ( 245 bytes ) Re: Re: Proteolytic enzymes supplements improve cellular-level biochemistry? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-09 06:03 ) ( 173 bytes ) link

Dollo's Law --- Cadizat ( 2009-09-29 23:20 ) ( 444 bytes ) +8 Intelligent designing (Engineering) approach to life --- DWA ( 2009-09-30 13:36 ) ( 694 bytes ) link +1 DWA approach to question framing --- Frank ( 2009-09-30 13:52 ) ( 183 bytes ) +1 My foot stomp duly acknowledged --- DWA ( 2009-09-30 15:19 ) ( 1040 bytes ) +2   Re: My foot stomp duly acknowledged --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-09 06:07 ) ( 138 bytes ) +1   I, black robot... too, yam humaniod? --- DWA ( 2009-10-09 22:03 ) ( 313 bytes ) Re: My foot stomp duly acknowledged// Heroes --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-10 02:55 ) ( 408 bytes ) +1   See, I'm not "noymal": 4 brain semispheres? --- DWA ( 2009-10-10 10:12 ) ( 226 bytes ) +1 Re: See, I'm not "noymal": 4 brain semispheres? --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-10 15:16 ) ( 257 bytes )

Now hear this --- Cadizat ( 2009-09-26 19:27 ) ( 250 bytes ) +23   The answer is in teleology --- DWA ( 2009-09-26 23:20 ) ( 526 bytes ) Is that Water or H2O? --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-09-26 23:35 ) ( 330 bytes ) link +1 Re: Is that Water or H2O? --- Cadizat ( 2009-09-27 00:31 ) ( 516 bytes ) +2 Once perfection were attained; how would it stop evolving? --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-09-27 13:29 ) ( 1835 bytes ) +3   Re: Once perfection were attained; how would it stop evolving? --- Gaele ( 2009-10-01 21:44 ) ( 678 bytes ) +1   PS --- Gaele ( 2009-10-01 21:50 ) ( 554 bytes ) +1 Perhaps we are just to sing and dance --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-10-02 17:58 ) ( 280 bytes ) +1 Re: Perhaps we are just to sing and dance --- Gaele ( 2009-10-02 20:25 ) ( 808 bytes ) Re: Once perfection were attained; how would it stop evolving? --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-02 14:54 ) ( 214 bytes )   Re: Once perfection were attained; how would it stop evolving? --- Gaele ( 2009-10-02 20:33 ) ( 234 bytes ) +1 You have to ask ...... Are you sure you want the answer? --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-10-03 05:08 ) ( 2798 bytes ) link +2 Re: You have to ask ...... Are you sure you want the answer? --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-04 21:54 ) ( 499 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: You have to ask ...... Are you sure you want the answer? --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-10-05 16:04 ) ( 1458 bytes ) link +1 Re: Re: Re: You have to ask ...... Are you sure you want the answer? --- Cadizat ( 2009-10-06 01:02 ) ( 460 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: You have to ask ...... Are you sure you want the answer? --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-10-06 10:07 ) ( 224 bytes )   Re: You have to ask ...... Are you sure you want the answer? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-10-05 17:54 ) ( 822 bytes ) +2 Probably should have left that out........ --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-10-06 00:41 ) ( 1647 bytes ) link +1   Re: Probably should have left that out........ --- Gaele ( 2009-10-06 22:52 ) ( 394 bytes ) link +2 WOW! --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-10-07 01:29 ) ( 1147 bytes ) link Double WOW!....... Gaele destroyer of the TWONKY! --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-10-07 15:29 ) ( 1255 bytes ) link +1 Re: Double WOW!....... Gaele destroyer of the TWONKY! --- Gaele ( 2009-10-08 16:21 ) ( 465 bytes ) duplicate --- Federal Farmer ( 2009-10-06 00:42 ) ( 6 bytes ) link Re: Re: Is that Water or H2O? --- cadizat ( 2009-09-27 16:02 ) ( 20 bytes )