Go to Home Page
The Truth Tree's Evolution Message Board
Moderated by Frank
Please read the
Evolution Position Statement
before posting here.
And check out our
FAQ
page.
 
Evolution
707-1006/1006
1.5 hours
3 hours
6 hours
12 hours
Today's
last visit-
page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
Post Message
Find
Overview
Register
Login
Admin
Walter Lippman was no Hadron colliding scientist
---
DWA
( 2009-07-04 14:50 ) (
1022 bytes
)
link
The news has got their science wrong again
---
Crossbowman
( 2009-07-02 15:13 ) (
2193 bytes
)
link
+4
Re: The news has got their science wrong again
---
Cyanidefreak
( 2009-07-02 15:55 ) (
107 bytes
)
OTOH, let's connect *all* of the dots between invertebrates and vertebrates+
---
DWA
( 2009-07-03 07:59 ) (
953 bytes
)
link
+1
You shall be Heckled for that.
---
Cyanidefreak
( 2009-07-03 14:29 ) (
196 bytes
)
+1
Ohno-o-o
---
DWA
( 2009-07-03 18:54 ) (
100 bytes
)
Are whales *really* mammals? Is there wordless logic?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-30 10:33 ) (
792 bytes
)
+7
if it offends you, pluck it out
---
Frank
( 2009-06-30 12:34 ) (
621 bytes
)
+1
Bearded whales got it from their catfish ancestral kin
---
DWA
( 2009-06-30 12:45 ) (
59 bytes
)
+1
knotted, beaded braided?
---
Frank
( 2009-06-30 13:12 ) (
240 bytes
)
+1
Do whales have pubes where it stinks?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-30 13:24 ) (
485 bytes
)
+1
people with alopecia universalis are still people
---
Frank
( 2009-07-01 00:19 ) (
649 bytes
)
+1
Mustache trims? Leaning towers of Farsided Beef-nesses?
---
DWA
( 2009-07-01 10:32 ) (
997 bytes
)
+1
are bunnytrails a mammalian trait?
---
Frank
( 2009-07-01 15:23 ) (
1376 bytes
)
Awesome Lazarus Baobab
---
DWA
( 2009-06-27 09:57 ) (
277 bytes
)
link
Tool use alters brain map
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-24 14:23 ) (
534 bytes
)
link
+5
Re: Tool use alters brain map
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-24 15:23 ) (
639 bytes
)
+1
Analyzing rearch projects
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-24 17:48 ) (
3320 bytes
)
link
+2
Tools that evolve before our very eyes: language, internet, blogs, blackberries,
---
DWA
( 2009-06-24 18:09 ) (
804 bytes
)
Re: Analyzing rearch projects
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-24 22:33 ) (
2565 bytes
)
+1
Crew, p-prepare to ram
---
DWA
( 2009-06-25 15:23 ) (
287 bytes
)
Let's define "evolution"+ :-)
---
DWA
( 2009-06-24 07:59 ) (
701 bytes
)
+50
Re: Let's define "evolution"+ :-)
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-24 09:20 ) (
66 bytes
)
+1
Monkeys don't neglect their offspring or lie under oath
---
DWA
( 2009-06-24 13:12 ) (
106 bytes
)
+1
can you trust a monkey swearing on a stack of Bibles?
---
Frank
( 2009-06-24 17:42 ) (
261 bytes
)
link
+1
Re: can you trust a monkey swearing on a stack of Bibles?
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-24 17:51 ) (
488 bytes
)
link
+2
Why did that particular double rebuttal happen so fast?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-24 17:56 ) (
114 bytes
)
+2
prior to any self-congratulatory scratching...
---
Frank
( 2009-06-24 20:16 ) (
118 bytes
)
+1
Brushing by my original obsession, what is "evolution" (vs. other scenarioes?)
---
DWA
( 2009-06-24 20:33 ) (
516 bytes
)
+1
changes in allele frequencies over time as opposed to a ladder of progress?
---
Frank
( 2009-06-25 00:33 ) (
1144 bytes
)
+1
Re: changes in allele frequencies over time as opposed to a ladder of progress?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-25 07:31 ) (
2296 bytes
)
link
+1
Accuracy is enhanced when better definitions are sought?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-25 15:33 ) (
949 bytes
)
+1
Re: Accuracy is enhanced when better definitions are sought?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-25 16:16 ) (
282 bytes
)
link
+1
1st embedded link undersized, second one verrry pretty
---
DWA
( 2009-06-26 11:50 ) (
89 bytes
)
+1
Re: 1st embedded link undersized, second one verrry pretty
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-27 12:47 ) (
162 bytes
)
Re: Why did that particular double rebuttal happen so fast?
---
Cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-29 17:16 ) (
107 bytes
)
+3
Intelligently designing the one-tribe, multi-family noetic Earth+
---
DWA
( 2009-06-30 09:38 ) (
1371 bytes
)
+1
What original intelligent design?
---
Crossbowman
( 2009-07-01 18:13 ) (
46 bytes
)
Re: Re: Evolution of humankind "beyond" the animal?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-30 09:38 ) (
1780 bytes
)
link
What if we're doing it now?
---
Crossbowman
( 2009-07-01 18:34 ) (
1139 bytes
)
+2
Re: What if we're doing it now?
---
Cyanidefreak
( 2009-07-02 09:47 ) (
411 bytes
)
+1
Re: Re: What if we're doing it now?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-07-03 14:32 ) (
1006 bytes
)
+1
Angus refused to play marbles on the "me" in "metaphysics"+link
---
DWA
( 2009-07-03 19:18 ) (
828 bytes
)
+2
Re: Angus refused to play marbles on the "me" in "metaphysics"+link
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-07-03 20:38 ) (
652 bytes
)
+1
Angus calls DWA a liar over this?
---
DWA
( 2009-07-03 23:44 ) (
4366 bytes
)
link
+1
Re: Angus thinks doggie posters may need bones VERY desperately.
---
Angus Cunningham
(
2009-07-04 14:17
) (
1259 bytes
)
+1
Spawn/litter of dhole?
---
DWA
( 2009-07-04 14:35 ) (
69 bytes
)
Re: Mistaken allegation, unsupported, Not worth replying to (MA, U. NWRT)
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-07-03 20:40 ) (
1 bytes
)
Re: What if we're doing it now?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-07-03 14:45 ) (
861 bytes
)
link
+1
Intelligently designed microbes to produce grassoline
---
DWA
( 2009-07-03 18:57 ) (
247 bytes
)
Re: Re: can you trust a monkey swearing on a stack of Bibles?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-25 07:02 ) (
3384 bytes
)
+2
What I think is ... (redo)
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-25 10:12 ) (
2128 bytes
)
+1
Re: Prospects for replacing IAXAs with IHXENs?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-26 11:33 ) (
3606 bytes
)
+2
Hold on there, Angus. Frank should give this Critiotic"ham" the hook?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-26 12:52 ) (
2295 bytes
)
An adamantly conserved genetic component III
---
Cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-29 13:42 ) (
8682 bytes
)
link
+1
Re: IHXENizing margin of non-adamantly conserved genetic components?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-30 10:13 ) (
2916 bytes
)
link
+3
For scientific validation, "ever" suffices, "often" is not necessary
---
DWA
( 2009-06-30 10:51 ) (
1634 bytes
)
+1
Maple Leaf Forever?
---
Frank
( 2009-07-01 00:22 ) (
163 bytes
)
+2
Maple flavored cough syrup is sticky north and south, in spades
---
DWA
( 2009-07-01 10:45 ) (
808 bytes
)
Re: Maple Leaf Forever?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-07-01 14:58 ) (
520 bytes
)
You are wearing me out
---
Cyanidefreak
( 2009-07-01 09:54 ) (
814 bytes
)
link
+1
Re: Blame DWA!
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-07-01 15:07 ) (
638 bytes
)
+1
I AM
---
Cyanidefreak
( 2009-07-02 09:50 ) (
104 bytes
)
+2
I, YAM. Successor to man is intelligently designed.
---
DWA
( 2009-07-03 08:57 ) (
556 bytes
)
link
Re: Were you?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-07-03 15:00 ) (
637 bytes
)
+2
Re: Re: Were you?
---
Cyanidefreak
( 2009-07-03 15:21 ) (
186 bytes
)
+1
Re: Re: Re: Were you?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-07-03 20:47 ) (
391 bytes
)
Getting "English" "right" is equally fascinating?
---
DWA
( 2009-07-04 00:06 ) (
105 bytes
)
link
You are wearing me out duplicate
---
Cyanidefreak
( 2009-07-01 09:55 ) (
1 bytes
)
link
+1
Re: You are wearing me out
---
Cyanidefreak
( 2009-07-01 10:00 ) (
159 bytes
)
+1
TT Evo has the bug the worst. Tried Chiropractic?
---
DWA
( 2009-07-01 10:59 ) (
1040 bytes
)
Feminists have Democrats in the Pocket?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-25 15:44 ) (
1126 bytes
)
Gratitude
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-23 08:26 ) (
4169 bytes
)
link
+15
Evolution of the cast iron toilet? Shelless eggs defined? Seeds?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-23 10:11 ) (
1472 bytes
)
+2
Re: Evolution of the cast iron toilet? Shelless eggs defined? Seeds?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-23 11:36 ) (
736 bytes
)
link
DWA: lacking in huevos?
---
Frank
( 2009-06-23 15:20 ) (
1432 bytes
)
+2
Frankian avenues with no outlet
---
DWA
( 2009-06-23 19:24 ) (
939 bytes
)
+1
is something pointing the way to a dead-end bunnytrail?
---
Frank
( 2009-06-23 21:27 ) (
1819 bytes
)
+1
Work is waiting higher up
---
DWA
( 2009-06-24 20:23 ) (
516 bytes
)
link
+1
you got something right!
---
Frank
( 2009-06-25 00:36 ) (
214 bytes
)
+1
Re: you got something right!
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-25 07:49 ) (
135 bytes
)
+1
Re: Re: you got something right!
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-25 10:42 ) (
1818 bytes
)
link
+1
I don't like monkeys
---
DWA
( 2009-06-25 16:09 ) (
418 bytes
)
Re: DWA: sucking huevos with straws?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-23 20:49 ) (
1166 bytes
)
+1
"sucking vicarious life" with a steenking straw
---
DWA
( 2009-06-23 21:13 ) (
385 bytes
)
+1
Re: "sucking vicarious life" with a steenking straw
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-24 10:32 ) (
670 bytes
)
+1
Transmitted English, and received English. Bending the saplings.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-24 13:18 ) (
688 bytes
)
+1
Re: Transmitted English, and received English. Bending the saplings.
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-24 15:59 ) (
2869 bytes
)
link
Angus' reference paper.
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-19 12:24 ) (
1306 bytes
)
+42
Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-19 15:15 ) (
1301 bytes
)
link
+3
Why do TT Evo posts post but not acknowledge?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-19 16:03 ) (
121 bytes
)
+1
Re: Why do TT Evo posts post but not acknowledge?
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-19 16:32 ) (
47 bytes
)
+1
Distractions
---
DWA
( 2009-06-19 16:52 ) (
433 bytes
)
Successful deconstruction+
---
DWA
( 2009-06-19 16:03 ) (
771 bytes
)
Re: Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-19 16:35 ) (
28 bytes
)
+1
Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-19 23:41 ) (
663 bytes
)
img
+2
Angus wants us to think he's smart?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-20 08:51 ) (
230 bytes
)
+1
Re: Angus wants us to think he's smart?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-22 11:38 ) (
614 bytes
)
link
+1
Crossbowman can be polemic.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-22 14:40 ) (
726 bytes
)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-22 14:48 ) (
57 bytes
)
+1
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-22 16:02 ) (
1618 bytes
)
+1
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-22 16:33 ) (
222 bytes
)
+1
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-22 17:17 ) (
3596 bytes
)
link
+1
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-23 10:16 ) (
1049 bytes
)
+2
Don't need no steenking diplomas
---
DWA
( 2009-06-23 10:41 ) (
1114 bytes
)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-23 12:02 ) (
1445 bytes
)
link
+1
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-23 13:52 ) (
1628 bytes
)
link
+1
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-23 15:35 ) (
2313 bytes
)
+1
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-23 17:18 ) (
321 bytes
)
+2
The gauntlet drops. Will Angus bend?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-23 20:54 ) (
685 bytes
)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-23 20:55 ) (
295 bytes
)
+2
Interfacing with a semblance of unsalaried reality
---
DWA
( 2009-06-23 21:02 ) (
394 bytes
)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-24 09:14 ) (
770 bytes
)
+1
Re: Angus' reference paper.
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-24 10:47 ) (
963 bytes
)
+1
To go with the tighter research standards
---
DWA
( 2009-06-24 13:47 ) (
1633 bytes
)
+1
Re: To go with the tighter research standards
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-24 16:21 ) (
2108 bytes
)
img
+1
Re: Re: To go with the tighter research standards
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-25 13:12 ) (
1373 bytes
)
link
+3
Laterile and DMSO
---
DWA
( 2009-06-25 16:01 ) (
1201 bytes
)
link
+1
Re: Laterile and DMSO
---
Cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-26 09:53 ) (
1125 bytes
)
link
+1
Beautiful, terse evocative Neruda poetry? Overbass ringtones, I see.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-26 12:00 ) (
775 bytes
)
link
Re: Re: Re: To go with the tighter research standards
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-26 12:00 ) (
1640 bytes
)
link
+3
Subjective and objective truth are not necessarily tightly linked
---
DWA
( 2009-06-26 13:38 ) (
721 bytes
)
+1
Re: Subjective & objective truth closely linked, & uniquely?, in IHXEN exchange
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-27 16:10 ) (
1014 bytes
)
Re: Re: Re: Re: This might interest CF ...
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-27 16:21 ) (
148 bytes
)
link
Re: Re: Re: Re: This might interest CF ... +090630
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-27 16:22 ) (
2719 bytes
)
link
+1
2 pole thinking:, implicit and explicit: Quantum dependency w/psycho-twist
---
DWA
( 2009-06-28 09:20 ) (
2621 bytes
)
+1
Re: Correction
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-28 11:46 ) (
1234 bytes
)
link
+1
Angus commendably corrects himself/clarifies
---
DWA
( 2009-06-28 16:14 ) (
731 bytes
)
+1
Re: Angus commendably corrects himself/clarifies
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-28 19:55 ) (
328 bytes
)
+1
The "me" inputed in Greek root "meta" was unforgiveable, demanded comment
---
DWA
( 2009-06-29 11:10 ) (
698 bytes
)
Re: Re: Re: This might interest CF
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-27 16:25 ) (
190 bytes
)
link
Crossbowman makes relevant comments at TTPol. Plants lay eggs?+
---
DWA
( 2009-06-18 10:53 ) (
393 bytes
)
link
Frank, in these discussions should desist ....
---
DWA
( 2009-06-17 21:20 ) (
402 bytes
)
+34
if it makes you happy
---
Frank
( 2009-06-17 22:49 ) (
828 bytes
)
+1
Skulls made of memory plastic and resistant to tutorial or burial
---
DWA
( 2009-06-18 09:47 ) (
931 bytes
)
+2
T wrecks in your case?
---
Frank
( 2009-06-18 12:38 ) (
1420 bytes
)
+1
Pecking on the shell and cheeping plaintively, FROM the INSIDE
---
DWA
( 2009-06-18 22:03 ) (
347 bytes
)
+1
Schroedinger's chicken?
---
Frank
( 2009-06-19 01:33 ) (
680 bytes
)
+1
!?Are you serious?!
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-19 09:43 ) (
235 bytes
)
+3
Skinless Franks are still franks
---
DWA
( 2009-06-19 10:12 ) (
617 bytes
)
+1
DWA and the Year of '39 in the land that his ancestors knew (Queen 1976)
---
Frank
( 2009-06-19 15:56 ) (
1321 bytes
)
+1
Helping chicks before their time with Kevlar protection
---
DWA
( 2009-06-19 16:45 ) (
311 bytes
)
serious? do you know how hard it is keeping my tongue in my cheek?
---
Frank
( 2009-06-19 15:19 ) (
2102 bytes
)
+2
Real meat noted inside of the intestinal membrane+rev.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-19 15:36 ) (
2037 bytes
)
+1
well, chew on this
---
Frank
( 2009-06-19 19:50 ) (
1762 bytes
)
+1
Humans are animals with a plus. Frank gets unbelieveable. References?.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-19 21:29 ) (
1251 bytes
)
link
+1
circle of life?
---
Frank
( 2009-06-19 23:56 ) (
3184 bytes
)
link
+1
Ancestry of intelligent designs dot connected?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-20 09:06 ) (
1243 bytes
)
+1
closer to an answer?
---
Frank
( 2009-06-20 15:30 ) (
1855 bytes
)
+1
"An animal" is a descendant of "another animal"
---
DWA
( 2009-06-20 19:57 ) (
484 bytes
)
+1
a bush is not a circle
---
Frank
( 2009-06-20 21:22 ) (
1418 bytes
)
+1
Frank demurrs in the animal-vegetable-mineral game?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-20 23:54 ) (
642 bytes
)
+1
none of the above?
---
Frank
( 2009-06-21 02:10 ) (
334 bytes
)
+1
Correct
---
DWA
( 2009-06-21 09:20 ) (
136 bytes
)
OK ...
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-19 16:38 ) (
153 bytes
)
link
Re: !?Are you serious?!
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-19 15:25 ) (
611 bytes
)
+2
Awesomely profound.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-19 16:14 ) (
94 bytes
)
Re: Re: !?Are you serious?!
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-22 10:46 ) (
51 bytes
)
+1
A pelt or a shell is not an essential exoskeleton
---
DWA
( 2009-06-22 14:31 ) (
422 bytes
)
+1
Re: Awarding DWA his (long sought?) Master of Linguistic Antics
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-23 07:11 ) (
76 bytes
)
+1
Angus is also nimble. More grassoline.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-23 10:30 ) (
489 bytes
)
+1
Re: Slithery grassoline?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-23 12:06 ) (
147 bytes
)
GODDAMMIT!
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-19 09:40 ) (
44 bytes
)
+1
The TT Evo Puppet Show.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-19 10:16 ) (
234 bytes
)
+1
authentic?
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-19 11:15 ) (
35 bytes
)
+1
Perplexed and trapped
---
DWA
( 2009-06-19 17:05 ) (
84 bytes
)
+1
Re: Nithe thwymming
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-25 07:53 ) (
1 bytes
)
Interesting egg/chicken take
---
cadizat
( 2009-06-16 20:27 ) (
259 bytes
)
+1
Re: Interesting egg/chicken take
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-17 13:52 ) (
38 bytes
)
Frank received Angus accolades, while I am trashed *moderated again*
---
DWA
( 2009-06-14 03:27 ) (
1219 bytes
)
link
+44
Nothing beats record of "what is an animal?" dialogue where Frank needs assist
---
DWA
( 2009-06-14 22:03 ) (
714 bytes
)
+2
I'm not convinced
---
Frank
( 2009-06-15 01:23 ) (
1991 bytes
)
+1
Re: I'm not convinced
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-15 09:37 ) (
511 bytes
)
+2
Possibly those non-phytosynthetic entities are not always animals? Spock?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-15 13:53 ) (
1151 bytes
)
+2
Re: Human + emotion not equal to animal!
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-15 14:50 ) (
252 bytes
)
+1
Symbols
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-15 17:28 ) (
2798 bytes
)
link
+1
Re: Symbols
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-16 08:00 ) (
1480 bytes
)
+1
Re: Re: Symbols
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-19 09:36 ) (
362 bytes
)
+1
Overlap of wrinkled body linguistics between human and animal
---
DWA
( 2009-06-19 10:25 ) (
629 bytes
)
can something that doesn't really exist live long and prosper?
---
Frank
( 2009-06-15 18:55 ) (
2714 bytes
)
+1
Prove there are no Klingons.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-19 17:15 ) (
299 bytes
)
+1
I'll drink a toast of bloodwine to the possibility
---
Frank
( 2009-06-19 20:03 ) (
985 bytes
)
The back story (again)---> with an addition for emphasis
---
Frank
( 2009-06-15 15:02 ) (
3869 bytes
)
+2
Frank "tired", in his own Fraudian slip words. Giggle.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-16 00:48 ) (
1504 bytes
)
+1
the soft sound of a stomping aardvark
---
Frank
( 2009-06-16 02:01 ) (
2355 bytes
)
Re: The back story (again)---> with an addition for emphasis
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-16 14:04 ) (
173 bytes
)
+1
Frank should be more gun-shy because of Skibummer, yes.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-16 21:51 ) (
1025 bytes
)
+1
but aardvarks avoid putting their snouts into unfamiliar termite mounds
---
Frank
( 2009-06-17 16:09 ) (
1344 bytes
)
Re: Nothing beats record of "what is an animal?" dialogues assist
---
cadizat
( 2009-06-16 20:35 ) (
228 bytes
)
+1
Revisiting old trichotomies
---
DWA
( 2009-06-16 21:56 ) (
451 bytes
)
+1
it is not surprising that everything is simple on an aardbvark's world
---
Frank
( 2009-06-17 11:46 ) (
463 bytes
)
+2
Re: it is not surprising that everything is simple on an aardbvark's world
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-17 13:50 ) (
57 bytes
)
+2
Semantics and objectivity
---
DWA
( 2009-06-17 14:11 ) (
874 bytes
)
link
+1
Re: Semantics and objectivity
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-23 09:00 ) (
652 bytes
)
link
watching an aardvarkian snipe hunt
---
Frank
( 2009-06-17 15:44 ) (
242 bytes
)
The foetus as a source of "animal" material even if stomped on/aborted.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-17 14:39 ) (
1056 bytes
)
+1
screaming aardvarks can't hear eggs whispering
---
Frank
( 2009-06-17 16:02 ) (
1649 bytes
)
+1
Your reformulation is flawed, of course
---
DWA
( 2009-06-17 21:13 ) (
1396 bytes
)
+2
well, it must feel different when it's your aardvak getting gored
---
Frank
( 2009-06-17 23:01 ) (
2147 bytes
)
+1
"Animal" as a broad collective category
---
DWA
( 2009-06-18 09:56 ) (
369 bytes
)
+2
aardvark under water?
---
Frank
( 2009-06-18 11:47 ) (
774 bytes
)
+1
Coy Koi and teenaged vehicles of substance
---
DWA
( 2009-06-19 10:02 ) (
1403 bytes
)
+1
now you cry
---
Frank
( 2009-06-20 00:01 ) (
106 bytes
)
+1
And, Frank answered with a questioon.?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-20 09:12 ) (
274 bytes
)
+1
of course yes and no
---
Frank
( 2009-06-20 15:18 ) (
853 bytes
)
+1
Mmmm. Deep, verrry deep.+
---
DWA
( 2009-06-21 09:14 ) (
1173 bytes
)
+1
on close inspection...
---
Frank
( 2009-06-21 18:29 ) (
146 bytes
)
+1
Grz dah net zum mor? *MODERATED*
---
DWA
( 2009-06-22 09:58 ) (
105 bytes
)
+1
Re: Grz dah net zum mor? *MODERATED*
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-23 09:14 ) (
170 bytes
)
+1
Cruise the net some more.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-23 10:13 ) (
1 bytes
)
"Is a teenager a human?"
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-19 09:32 ) (
9 bytes
)
+1
Freeks in remission?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-19 16:47 ) (
67 bytes
)
Re: Projectio ad absurdam?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-23 09:10 ) (
620 bytes
)
+1
What emotions? Don't need no steenking emotions.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-23 10:23 ) (
1 bytes
)
Intricacy and complexity do not guarantee substance+gravity mysteries
---
DWA
( 2009-06-13 07:03 ) (
1034 bytes
)
link
We haven't evolved some learning mechanisms
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-08 14:24 ) (
1496 bytes
)
link
+66
Idiot savants lead the progressive way
---
DWA
( 2009-06-08 14:38 ) (
178 bytes
)
Which explains the emergence and rise of homosexuality?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-09 10:02 ) (
858 bytes
)
+1
Yon professor is clearly not a professor of education
---
Crossbowman
( 2009-06-10 09:21 ) (
787 bytes
)
+1
Mediocrity happens in the softer sciences but who's noticing?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-10 11:51 ) (
510 bytes
)
+4
from a distance
---
Frank
( 2009-06-10 15:27 ) (
207 bytes
)
+1
One doesn't need a crash course in "X"es to be bored, either.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-10 22:23 ) (
203 bytes
)
+1
nor does anyone need additional evidence of aardvarkian comprehension
---
Frank
( 2009-06-11 11:42 ) (
654 bytes
)
+1
Let Angus show his replicability, testing & falsification studies on the "X"es?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-11 14:37 ) (
1517 bytes
)
+1
Re: "X"es?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-12 18:45 ) (
467 bytes
)
+1
So many prophets, inventions, theories, so little time
---
DWA
( 2009-06-13 18:40 ) (
521 bytes
)
Re: A third correction of the mendacious DWA
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-10 16:36 ) (
479 bytes
)
+2
Snakes don't need no steenking legs
---
DWA
( 2009-06-10 22:19 ) (
1 bytes
)
+1
snakes shouldn't waste time biting ankles when there are bigger rats to catch
---
Frank
( 2009-06-11 11:50 ) (
697 bytes
)
+1
Frank has custody of the evidence+link to evidence
---
DWA
( 2009-06-11 14:40 ) (
119 bytes
)
+1
let's be sure we all have this right
---
Frank
( 2009-06-11 15:44 ) (
913 bytes
)
+1
Merely asking for affirmation or denial, Frank+
---
DWA
( 2009-06-11 17:20 ) (
994 bytes
)
+1
there is only one issue here and it is not Angus and it is not me
---
Frank
( 2009-06-11 20:15 ) (
1128 bytes
)
+1
A simple yes or no would conclude the matter for me.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-11 20:31 ) (
166 bytes
)
+1
whoever is scoring points, it is not you
---
Frank
( 2009-06-11 22:38 ) (
896 bytes
)
+1
Will the defendants please rise to the occasion? *moderated*
---
DWA
( 2009-06-12 00:34 ) (
148 bytes
)
+2
Naughty, Frank.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-12 04:13 ) (
125 bytes
)
+1
things I don't concern myself with
---
Frank
( 2009-06-12 11:44 ) (
550 bytes
)
+1
Cultivating the stony subducted alpine soil for voles+
---
DWA
( 2009-06-12 13:03 ) (
655 bytes
)
+2
corn is irrelevant; you are quite a few beans short of a full can
---
Frank
( 2009-06-12 16:09 ) (
1296 bytes
)
+1
Re: corn is irrelevant; you are quite a few beans short of a full can
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-12 18:59 ) (
167 bytes
)
voles don't go down bunnytrails
---
Frank
( 2009-06-12 16:45 ) (
312 bytes
)
+1
Respond to the TT Religion link, Angus' claims there, or not
---
DWA
( 2009-06-12 20:36 ) (
195 bytes
)
+2
respond to this first
---
Frank
( 2009-06-12 21:17 ) (
58 bytes
)
+1
Unscrambling Frank's induced confusion and intentional doubt
---
DWA
( 2009-06-12 23:34 ) (
900 bytes
)
link
+1
DWA: scatterguning deifnitions when he doesn't have a clue?
---
Frank
( 2009-06-13 00:23 ) (
103 bytes
)
+1
Re: for Frank's clarification
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-13 18:13 ) (
1121 bytes
)
+2
2X too many
---
DWA
( 2009-06-13 18:28 ) (
1 bytes
)
Angus is jealous of his self-provided spotlight?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-13 18:29 ) (
565 bytes
)
+1
Re: DWA being met by his own dishonesty?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-14 09:20 ) (
119 bytes
)
link
+1
Intelligently designing and improving our biospheres
---
DWA
( 2009-06-14 13:14 ) (
89 bytes
)
Re: Prescription?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-13 08:24 ) (
2674 bytes
)
link
+2
doubled
---
DWA
( 2009-06-13 17:59 ) (
41 bytes
)
Canadian Shedevil called me a liar once, too
---
DWA
( 2009-06-13 17:59 ) (
682 bytes
)
+1
Re: IHXENs and DWA's skepticism and lack of respect in posting
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-16 14:47 ) (
4522 bytes
)
+1
Also have not tried cholera, typhus, or meningitis
---
DWA
( 2009-06-16 22:10 ) (
979 bytes
)
+1
Re: The abject shame of DWA
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-17 06:55 ) (
313 bytes
)
+1
A firewall against nutcases & reinforced plastic tents. Frank's Tijuana ID?
---
DWA
( 2009-06-17 09:18 ) (
1197 bytes
)
ROTFLMAO!
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-12 09:46 ) (
9 bytes
)
+1
Also LOL at the quirky strained lame language credibility
---
DWA
( 2009-06-14 12:46 ) (
569 bytes
)
Hey, Mr Spell Checker!
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-12 09:56 ) (
52 bytes
)
Re: Mediocrity happens in the softer sciences but who's noticing?
---
The Barbarian
( 2009-06-10 21:52 ) (
78 bytes
)
+1
Psychology is a fairly soft science, also, politics.
---
DWA
( 2009-06-10 22:18 ) (
1 bytes
)
Re: Mediocrity happens in the softer sciences but who's noticing?
---
The Barbarian
( 2009-06-10 21:52 ) (
78 bytes
)
Re: We haven't evolved some learning mechanisms
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-09 11:04 ) (
2139 bytes
)
link
+3
Re: Re: We haven't evolved some learning mechanisms
---
cadizat
( 2009-06-12 00:24 ) (
198 bytes
)
+1
Re: Re: Re: We haven't evolved some learning mechanisms
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-12 19:05 ) (
153 bytes
)
Re: Re: We haven't evolved some learning mechanisms
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-12 09:48 ) (
152 bytes
)
Re: Re: We haven't evolved some learning mechanisms
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-12 09:49 ) (
152 bytes
)
We "evovled" Spell Check instead
---
Crossbowman
( 2009-06-11 17:18 ) (
14 bytes
)
+2
Misspell, minus 2 points, CMB
---
DWA
( 2009-06-11 19:58 ) (
11 bytes
)
!@#$%^&*! spelling police
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-12 09:52 ) (
47 bytes
)
+1
Cross crossbow, and acrostic CF
---
DWA
( 2009-06-12 13:55 ) (
1 bytes
)
Re: We haven't evovled some learning mechanisms
---
cadizat
( 2009-06-12 00:18 ) (
1412 bytes
)
Re: We haven't evolved some learning mechanisms
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-12 12:01 ) (
8066 bytes
)
link
+2
Me-e-e too, but it needs to be fun++
---
DWA
( 2009-06-12 13:45 ) (
4050 bytes
)
Re: Re: A new and more powerful learning mechanism?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-13 09:01 ) (
2770 bytes
)
link
+1
Re: Re: Re: A new and more powerful learning mechanism?
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-15 09:08 ) (
402 bytes
)
+2
Pass-fail, digital notation. Uncertainty abounding
---
DWA
( 2009-06-15 14:15 ) (
569 bytes
)
Re: Re: Re: Re: A new and more powerful learning mechanism?
---
Angus Cunningham
( 2009-06-16 15:13 ) (
2602 bytes
)
link
+2
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A new and more powerful learning mechanism?
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-19 11:35 ) (
62 bytes
)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A new and more powerful learning mechanism?
---
cyanidefreak
( 2009-06-19 11:36 ) (
62 bytes
)
Powered by
AnyBoard