Walter Lippman was no Hadron colliding scientist --- DWA ( 2009-07-04 14:50 ) ( 1022 bytes ) link

The news has got their science wrong again --- Crossbowman ( 2009-07-02 15:13 ) ( 2193 bytes ) link +4 Re: The news has got their science wrong again --- Cyanidefreak ( 2009-07-02 15:55 ) ( 107 bytes )   OTOH, let's connect *all* of the dots between invertebrates and vertebrates+ --- DWA ( 2009-07-03 07:59 ) ( 953 bytes ) link +1 You shall be Heckled for that. --- Cyanidefreak ( 2009-07-03 14:29 ) ( 196 bytes ) +1 Ohno-o-o --- DWA ( 2009-07-03 18:54 ) ( 100 bytes )

Are whales *really* mammals? Is there wordless logic? --- DWA ( 2009-06-30 10:33 ) ( 792 bytes ) +7 if it offends you, pluck it out --- Frank ( 2009-06-30 12:34 ) ( 621 bytes ) +1 Bearded whales got it from their catfish ancestral kin --- DWA ( 2009-06-30 12:45 ) ( 59 bytes ) +1 knotted, beaded braided? --- Frank ( 2009-06-30 13:12 ) ( 240 bytes ) +1 Do whales have pubes where it stinks? --- DWA ( 2009-06-30 13:24 ) ( 485 bytes ) +1 people with alopecia universalis are still people --- Frank ( 2009-07-01 00:19 ) ( 649 bytes ) +1 Mustache trims? Leaning towers of Farsided Beef-nesses? --- DWA ( 2009-07-01 10:32 ) ( 997 bytes ) +1 are bunnytrails a mammalian trait? --- Frank ( 2009-07-01 15:23 ) ( 1376 bytes )

Awesome Lazarus Baobab --- DWA ( 2009-06-27 09:57 ) ( 277 bytes ) link

Tool use alters brain map --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-24 14:23 ) ( 534 bytes ) link +5 Re: Tool use alters brain map --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-24 15:23 ) ( 639 bytes ) +1 Analyzing rearch projects --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-24 17:48 ) ( 3320 bytes ) link +2 Tools that evolve before our very eyes: language, internet, blogs, blackberries, --- DWA ( 2009-06-24 18:09 ) ( 804 bytes ) Re: Analyzing rearch projects --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-24 22:33 ) ( 2565 bytes ) +1   Crew, p-prepare to ram --- DWA ( 2009-06-25 15:23 ) ( 287 bytes )

Let's define "evolution"+ :-) --- DWA ( 2009-06-24 07:59 ) ( 701 bytes ) +50 Re: Let's define "evolution"+ :-) --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-24 09:20 ) ( 66 bytes ) +1 Monkeys don't neglect their offspring or lie under oath --- DWA ( 2009-06-24 13:12 ) ( 106 bytes ) +1 can you trust a monkey swearing on a stack of Bibles? --- Frank ( 2009-06-24 17:42 ) ( 261 bytes ) link +1 Re: can you trust a monkey swearing on a stack of Bibles? --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-24 17:51 ) ( 488 bytes ) link +2 Why did that particular double rebuttal happen so fast? --- DWA ( 2009-06-24 17:56 ) ( 114 bytes ) +2 prior to any self-congratulatory scratching... --- Frank ( 2009-06-24 20:16 ) ( 118 bytes ) +1 Brushing by my original obsession, what is "evolution" (vs. other scenarioes?) --- DWA ( 2009-06-24 20:33 ) ( 516 bytes ) +1 changes in allele frequencies over time as opposed to a ladder of progress? --- Frank ( 2009-06-25 00:33 ) ( 1144 bytes ) +1   Re: changes in allele frequencies over time as opposed to a ladder of progress? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-25 07:31 ) ( 2296 bytes ) link +1 Accuracy is enhanced when better definitions are sought? --- DWA ( 2009-06-25 15:33 ) ( 949 bytes ) +1 Re: Accuracy is enhanced when better definitions are sought? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-25 16:16 ) ( 282 bytes ) link +1 1st embedded link undersized, second one verrry pretty --- DWA ( 2009-06-26 11:50 ) ( 89 bytes ) +1 Re: 1st embedded link undersized, second one verrry pretty --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-27 12:47 ) ( 162 bytes ) Re: Why did that particular double rebuttal happen so fast? --- Cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-29 17:16 ) ( 107 bytes ) +3 Intelligently designing the one-tribe, multi-family noetic Earth+ --- DWA ( 2009-06-30 09:38 ) ( 1371 bytes ) +1 What original intelligent design? --- Crossbowman ( 2009-07-01 18:13 ) ( 46 bytes )   Re: Re: Evolution of humankind "beyond" the animal? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-30 09:38 ) ( 1780 bytes ) link What if we're doing it now? --- Crossbowman ( 2009-07-01 18:34 ) ( 1139 bytes ) +2 Re: What if we're doing it now? --- Cyanidefreak ( 2009-07-02 09:47 ) ( 411 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: What if we're doing it now? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-03 14:32 ) ( 1006 bytes ) +1 Angus refused to play marbles on the "me" in "metaphysics"+link --- DWA ( 2009-07-03 19:18 ) ( 828 bytes ) +2 Re: Angus refused to play marbles on the "me" in "metaphysics"+link --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-03 20:38 ) ( 652 bytes ) +1 Angus calls DWA a liar over this? --- DWA ( 2009-07-03 23:44 ) ( 4366 bytes ) link +1 Re: Angus thinks doggie posters may need bones VERY desperately. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-04 14:17 ) ( 1259 bytes ) +1 Spawn/litter of dhole? --- DWA ( 2009-07-04 14:35 ) ( 69 bytes ) Re: Mistaken allegation, unsupported, Not worth replying to (MA, U. NWRT) --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-03 20:40 ) ( 1 bytes ) Re: What if we're doing it now? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-03 14:45 ) ( 861 bytes ) link +1   Intelligently designed microbes to produce grassoline --- DWA ( 2009-07-03 18:57 ) ( 247 bytes )   Re: Re: can you trust a monkey swearing on a stack of Bibles? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-25 07:02 ) ( 3384 bytes ) +2 What I think is ... (redo) --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-25 10:12 ) ( 2128 bytes ) +1 Re: Prospects for replacing IAXAs with IHXENs? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-26 11:33 ) ( 3606 bytes ) +2 Hold on there, Angus. Frank should give this Critiotic"ham" the hook? --- DWA ( 2009-06-26 12:52 ) ( 2295 bytes ) An adamantly conserved genetic component III --- Cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-29 13:42 ) ( 8682 bytes ) link +1   Re: IHXENizing margin of non-adamantly conserved genetic components? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-30 10:13 ) ( 2916 bytes ) link +3 For scientific validation, "ever" suffices, "often" is not necessary --- DWA ( 2009-06-30 10:51 ) ( 1634 bytes ) +1 Maple Leaf Forever? --- Frank ( 2009-07-01 00:22 ) ( 163 bytes ) +2   Maple flavored cough syrup is sticky north and south, in spades --- DWA ( 2009-07-01 10:45 ) ( 808 bytes ) Re: Maple Leaf Forever? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-01 14:58 ) ( 520 bytes ) You are wearing me out --- Cyanidefreak ( 2009-07-01 09:54 ) ( 814 bytes ) link +1   Re: Blame DWA! --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-01 15:07 ) ( 638 bytes ) +1 I AM --- Cyanidefreak ( 2009-07-02 09:50 ) ( 104 bytes ) +2 I, YAM. Successor to man is intelligently designed. --- DWA ( 2009-07-03 08:57 ) ( 556 bytes ) link Re: Were you? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-03 15:00 ) ( 637 bytes ) +2 Re: Re: Were you? --- Cyanidefreak ( 2009-07-03 15:21 ) ( 186 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Were you? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-03 20:47 ) ( 391 bytes ) Getting "English" "right" is equally fascinating? --- DWA ( 2009-07-04 00:06 ) ( 105 bytes ) link You are wearing me out duplicate --- Cyanidefreak ( 2009-07-01 09:55 ) ( 1 bytes ) link +1 Re: You are wearing me out --- Cyanidefreak ( 2009-07-01 10:00 ) ( 159 bytes ) +1 TT Evo has the bug the worst. Tried Chiropractic? --- DWA ( 2009-07-01 10:59 ) ( 1040 bytes ) Feminists have Democrats in the Pocket? --- DWA ( 2009-06-25 15:44 ) ( 1126 bytes )

Gratitude --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-23 08:26 ) ( 4169 bytes ) link +15   Evolution of the cast iron toilet? Shelless eggs defined? Seeds? --- DWA ( 2009-06-23 10:11 ) ( 1472 bytes ) +2   Re: Evolution of the cast iron toilet? Shelless eggs defined? Seeds? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-23 11:36 ) ( 736 bytes ) link DWA: lacking in huevos? --- Frank ( 2009-06-23 15:20 ) ( 1432 bytes ) +2 Frankian avenues with no outlet --- DWA ( 2009-06-23 19:24 ) ( 939 bytes ) +1 is something pointing the way to a dead-end bunnytrail? --- Frank ( 2009-06-23 21:27 ) ( 1819 bytes ) +1 Work is waiting higher up --- DWA ( 2009-06-24 20:23 ) ( 516 bytes ) link +1 you got something right! --- Frank ( 2009-06-25 00:36 ) ( 214 bytes ) +1   Re: you got something right! --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-25 07:49 ) ( 135 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: you got something right! --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-25 10:42 ) ( 1818 bytes ) link +1   I don't like monkeys --- DWA ( 2009-06-25 16:09 ) ( 418 bytes ) Re: DWA: sucking huevos with straws? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-23 20:49 ) ( 1166 bytes ) +1 "sucking vicarious life" with a steenking straw --- DWA ( 2009-06-23 21:13 ) ( 385 bytes ) +1 Re: "sucking vicarious life" with a steenking straw --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-24 10:32 ) ( 670 bytes ) +1 Transmitted English, and received English. Bending the saplings. --- DWA ( 2009-06-24 13:18 ) ( 688 bytes ) +1 Re: Transmitted English, and received English. Bending the saplings. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-24 15:59 ) ( 2869 bytes ) link

Angus' reference paper. --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-19 12:24 ) ( 1306 bytes ) +42 Re: Angus' reference paper. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-19 15:15 ) ( 1301 bytes ) link +3 Why do TT Evo posts post but not acknowledge? --- DWA ( 2009-06-19 16:03 ) ( 121 bytes ) +1 Re: Why do TT Evo posts post but not acknowledge? --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-19 16:32 ) ( 47 bytes ) +1 Distractions --- DWA ( 2009-06-19 16:52 ) ( 433 bytes ) Successful deconstruction+ --- DWA ( 2009-06-19 16:03 ) ( 771 bytes ) Re: Re: Angus' reference paper. --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-19 16:35 ) ( 28 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-19 23:41 ) ( 663 bytes ) img +2 Angus wants us to think he's smart? --- DWA ( 2009-06-20 08:51 ) ( 230 bytes ) +1 Re: Angus wants us to think he's smart? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-22 11:38 ) ( 614 bytes ) link +1 Crossbowman can be polemic. --- DWA ( 2009-06-22 14:40 ) ( 726 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper. --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-22 14:48 ) ( 57 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-22 16:02 ) ( 1618 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper. --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-22 16:33 ) ( 222 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-22 17:17 ) ( 3596 bytes ) link +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper. --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-23 10:16 ) ( 1049 bytes ) +2 Don't need no steenking diplomas --- DWA ( 2009-06-23 10:41 ) ( 1114 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-23 12:02 ) ( 1445 bytes ) link +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper. --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-23 13:52 ) ( 1628 bytes ) link +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-23 15:35 ) ( 2313 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper. --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-23 17:18 ) ( 321 bytes ) +2 The gauntlet drops. Will Angus bend? --- DWA ( 2009-06-23 20:54 ) ( 685 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-23 20:55 ) ( 295 bytes ) +2 Interfacing with a semblance of unsalaried reality --- DWA ( 2009-06-23 21:02 ) ( 394 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Angus' reference paper. --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-24 09:14 ) ( 770 bytes ) +1   Re: Angus' reference paper. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-24 10:47 ) ( 963 bytes ) +1 To go with the tighter research standards --- DWA ( 2009-06-24 13:47 ) ( 1633 bytes ) +1 Re: To go with the tighter research standards --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-24 16:21 ) ( 2108 bytes ) img +1 Re: Re: To go with the tighter research standards --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-25 13:12 ) ( 1373 bytes ) link +3 Laterile and DMSO --- DWA ( 2009-06-25 16:01 ) ( 1201 bytes ) link +1 Re: Laterile and DMSO --- Cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-26 09:53 ) ( 1125 bytes ) link +1   Beautiful, terse evocative Neruda poetry? Overbass ringtones, I see. --- DWA ( 2009-06-26 12:00 ) ( 775 bytes ) link Re: Re: Re: To go with the tighter research standards --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-26 12:00 ) ( 1640 bytes ) link +3 Subjective and objective truth are not necessarily tightly linked --- DWA ( 2009-06-26 13:38 ) ( 721 bytes ) +1 Re: Subjective & objective truth closely linked, & uniquely?, in IHXEN exchange --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-27 16:10 ) ( 1014 bytes )   Re: Re: Re: Re: This might interest CF ... --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-27 16:21 ) ( 148 bytes ) link   Re: Re: Re: Re: This might interest CF ... +090630 --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-27 16:22 ) ( 2719 bytes ) link +1 2 pole thinking:, implicit and explicit: Quantum dependency w/psycho-twist --- DWA ( 2009-06-28 09:20 ) ( 2621 bytes ) +1 Re: Correction --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-28 11:46 ) ( 1234 bytes ) link +1 Angus commendably corrects himself/clarifies --- DWA ( 2009-06-28 16:14 ) ( 731 bytes ) +1 Re: Angus commendably corrects himself/clarifies --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-28 19:55 ) ( 328 bytes ) +1   The "me" inputed in Greek root "meta" was unforgiveable, demanded comment --- DWA ( 2009-06-29 11:10 ) ( 698 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: This might interest CF --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-27 16:25 ) ( 190 bytes ) link

Crossbowman makes relevant comments at TTPol. Plants lay eggs?+ --- DWA ( 2009-06-18 10:53 ) ( 393 bytes ) link

Frank, in these discussions should desist .... --- DWA ( 2009-06-17 21:20 ) ( 402 bytes ) +34 if it makes you happy --- Frank ( 2009-06-17 22:49 ) ( 828 bytes ) +1 Skulls made of memory plastic and resistant to tutorial or burial --- DWA ( 2009-06-18 09:47 ) ( 931 bytes ) +2 T wrecks in your case? --- Frank ( 2009-06-18 12:38 ) ( 1420 bytes ) +1 Pecking on the shell and cheeping plaintively, FROM the INSIDE --- DWA ( 2009-06-18 22:03 ) ( 347 bytes ) +1 Schroedinger's chicken? --- Frank ( 2009-06-19 01:33 ) ( 680 bytes ) +1 !?Are you serious?! --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-19 09:43 ) ( 235 bytes ) +3 Skinless Franks are still franks --- DWA ( 2009-06-19 10:12 ) ( 617 bytes ) +1 DWA and the Year of '39 in the land that his ancestors knew (Queen 1976) --- Frank ( 2009-06-19 15:56 ) ( 1321 bytes ) +1 Helping chicks before their time with Kevlar protection --- DWA ( 2009-06-19 16:45 ) ( 311 bytes ) serious? do you know how hard it is keeping my tongue in my cheek? --- Frank ( 2009-06-19 15:19 ) ( 2102 bytes ) +2 Real meat noted inside of the intestinal membrane+rev. --- DWA ( 2009-06-19 15:36 ) ( 2037 bytes ) +1 well, chew on this --- Frank ( 2009-06-19 19:50 ) ( 1762 bytes ) +1 Humans are animals with a plus. Frank gets unbelieveable. References?. --- DWA ( 2009-06-19 21:29 ) ( 1251 bytes ) link +1 circle of life? --- Frank ( 2009-06-19 23:56 ) ( 3184 bytes ) link +1 Ancestry of intelligent designs dot connected? --- DWA ( 2009-06-20 09:06 ) ( 1243 bytes ) +1 closer to an answer? --- Frank ( 2009-06-20 15:30 ) ( 1855 bytes ) +1 "An animal" is a descendant of "another animal" --- DWA ( 2009-06-20 19:57 ) ( 484 bytes ) +1 a bush is not a circle --- Frank ( 2009-06-20 21:22 ) ( 1418 bytes ) +1 Frank demurrs in the animal-vegetable-mineral game? --- DWA ( 2009-06-20 23:54 ) ( 642 bytes ) +1 none of the above? --- Frank ( 2009-06-21 02:10 ) ( 334 bytes ) +1 Correct --- DWA ( 2009-06-21 09:20 ) ( 136 bytes ) OK ... --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-19 16:38 ) ( 153 bytes ) link   Re: !?Are you serious?! --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-19 15:25 ) ( 611 bytes ) +2 Awesomely profound. --- DWA ( 2009-06-19 16:14 ) ( 94 bytes ) Re: Re: !?Are you serious?! --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-22 10:46 ) ( 51 bytes ) +1   A pelt or a shell is not an essential exoskeleton --- DWA ( 2009-06-22 14:31 ) ( 422 bytes ) +1   Re: Awarding DWA his (long sought?) Master of Linguistic Antics --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-23 07:11 ) ( 76 bytes ) +1 Angus is also nimble. More grassoline. --- DWA ( 2009-06-23 10:30 ) ( 489 bytes ) +1 Re: Slithery grassoline? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-23 12:06 ) ( 147 bytes ) GODDAMMIT! --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-19 09:40 ) ( 44 bytes ) +1 The TT Evo Puppet Show. --- DWA ( 2009-06-19 10:16 ) ( 234 bytes ) +1 authentic? --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-19 11:15 ) ( 35 bytes ) +1 Perplexed and trapped --- DWA ( 2009-06-19 17:05 ) ( 84 bytes ) +1 Re: Nithe thwymming --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-25 07:53 ) ( 1 bytes )

Interesting egg/chicken take --- cadizat ( 2009-06-16 20:27 ) ( 259 bytes ) +1 Re: Interesting egg/chicken take --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-17 13:52 ) ( 38 bytes )

Frank received Angus accolades, while I am trashed *moderated again* --- DWA ( 2009-06-14 03:27 ) ( 1219 bytes ) link +44 Nothing beats record of "what is an animal?" dialogue where Frank needs assist --- DWA ( 2009-06-14 22:03 ) ( 714 bytes ) +2 I'm not convinced --- Frank ( 2009-06-15 01:23 ) ( 1991 bytes ) +1 Re: I'm not convinced --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-15 09:37 ) ( 511 bytes ) +2 Possibly those non-phytosynthetic entities are not always animals? Spock? --- DWA ( 2009-06-15 13:53 ) ( 1151 bytes ) +2   Re: Human + emotion not equal to animal! --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-15 14:50 ) ( 252 bytes ) +1 Symbols --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-15 17:28 ) ( 2798 bytes ) link +1 Re: Symbols --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-16 08:00 ) ( 1480 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Symbols --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-19 09:36 ) ( 362 bytes ) +1 Overlap of wrinkled body linguistics between human and animal --- DWA ( 2009-06-19 10:25 ) ( 629 bytes ) can something that doesn't really exist live long and prosper? --- Frank ( 2009-06-15 18:55 ) ( 2714 bytes ) +1   Prove there are no Klingons. --- DWA ( 2009-06-19 17:15 ) ( 299 bytes ) +1 I'll drink a toast of bloodwine to the possibility --- Frank ( 2009-06-19 20:03 ) ( 985 bytes ) The back story (again)---> with an addition for emphasis --- Frank ( 2009-06-15 15:02 ) ( 3869 bytes ) +2 Frank "tired", in his own Fraudian slip words. Giggle. --- DWA ( 2009-06-16 00:48 ) ( 1504 bytes ) +1 the soft sound of a stomping aardvark --- Frank ( 2009-06-16 02:01 ) ( 2355 bytes ) Re: The back story (again)---> with an addition for emphasis --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-16 14:04 ) ( 173 bytes ) +1   Frank should be more gun-shy because of Skibummer, yes. --- DWA ( 2009-06-16 21:51 ) ( 1025 bytes ) +1 but aardvarks avoid putting their snouts into unfamiliar termite mounds --- Frank ( 2009-06-17 16:09 ) ( 1344 bytes ) Re: Nothing beats record of "what is an animal?" dialogues assist --- cadizat ( 2009-06-16 20:35 ) ( 228 bytes ) +1 Revisiting old trichotomies --- DWA ( 2009-06-16 21:56 ) ( 451 bytes ) +1 it is not surprising that everything is simple on an aardbvark's world --- Frank ( 2009-06-17 11:46 ) ( 463 bytes ) +2 Re: it is not surprising that everything is simple on an aardbvark's world --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-17 13:50 ) ( 57 bytes ) +2 Semantics and objectivity --- DWA ( 2009-06-17 14:11 ) ( 874 bytes ) link +1   Re: Semantics and objectivity --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-23 09:00 ) ( 652 bytes ) link watching an aardvarkian snipe hunt --- Frank ( 2009-06-17 15:44 ) ( 242 bytes ) The foetus as a source of "animal" material even if stomped on/aborted. --- DWA ( 2009-06-17 14:39 ) ( 1056 bytes ) +1 screaming aardvarks can't hear eggs whispering --- Frank ( 2009-06-17 16:02 ) ( 1649 bytes ) +1 Your reformulation is flawed, of course --- DWA ( 2009-06-17 21:13 ) ( 1396 bytes ) +2 well, it must feel different when it's your aardvak getting gored --- Frank ( 2009-06-17 23:01 ) ( 2147 bytes ) +1 "Animal" as a broad collective category --- DWA ( 2009-06-18 09:56 ) ( 369 bytes ) +2 aardvark under water? --- Frank ( 2009-06-18 11:47 ) ( 774 bytes ) +1 Coy Koi and teenaged vehicles of substance --- DWA ( 2009-06-19 10:02 ) ( 1403 bytes ) +1 now you cry --- Frank ( 2009-06-20 00:01 ) ( 106 bytes ) +1   And, Frank answered with a questioon.? --- DWA ( 2009-06-20 09:12 ) ( 274 bytes ) +1 of course yes and no --- Frank ( 2009-06-20 15:18 ) ( 853 bytes ) +1 Mmmm. Deep, verrry deep.+ --- DWA ( 2009-06-21 09:14 ) ( 1173 bytes ) +1 on close inspection... --- Frank ( 2009-06-21 18:29 ) ( 146 bytes ) +1 Grz dah net zum mor? *MODERATED* --- DWA ( 2009-06-22 09:58 ) ( 105 bytes ) +1 Re: Grz dah net zum mor? *MODERATED* --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-23 09:14 ) ( 170 bytes ) +1   Cruise the net some more. --- DWA ( 2009-06-23 10:13 ) ( 1 bytes ) "Is a teenager a human?" --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-19 09:32 ) ( 9 bytes ) +1   Freeks in remission? --- DWA ( 2009-06-19 16:47 ) ( 67 bytes )   Re: Projectio ad absurdam? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-23 09:10 ) ( 620 bytes ) +1 What emotions? Don't need no steenking emotions. --- DWA ( 2009-06-23 10:23 ) ( 1 bytes )

Intricacy and complexity do not guarantee substance+gravity mysteries --- DWA ( 2009-06-13 07:03 ) ( 1034 bytes ) link

We haven't evolved some learning mechanisms --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-08 14:24 ) ( 1496 bytes ) link +66 Idiot savants lead the progressive way --- DWA ( 2009-06-08 14:38 ) ( 178 bytes ) Which explains the emergence and rise of homosexuality? --- DWA ( 2009-06-09 10:02 ) ( 858 bytes ) +1 Yon professor is clearly not a professor of education --- Crossbowman ( 2009-06-10 09:21 ) ( 787 bytes ) +1 Mediocrity happens in the softer sciences but who's noticing? --- DWA ( 2009-06-10 11:51 ) ( 510 bytes ) +4 from a distance --- Frank ( 2009-06-10 15:27 ) ( 207 bytes ) +1   One doesn't need a crash course in "X"es to be bored, either. --- DWA ( 2009-06-10 22:23 ) ( 203 bytes ) +1 nor does anyone need additional evidence of aardvarkian comprehension --- Frank ( 2009-06-11 11:42 ) ( 654 bytes ) +1 Let Angus show his replicability, testing & falsification studies on the "X"es? --- DWA ( 2009-06-11 14:37 ) ( 1517 bytes ) +1 Re: "X"es? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-12 18:45 ) ( 467 bytes ) +1 So many prophets, inventions, theories, so little time --- DWA ( 2009-06-13 18:40 ) ( 521 bytes ) Re: A third correction of the mendacious DWA --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-10 16:36 ) ( 479 bytes ) +2   Snakes don't need no steenking legs --- DWA ( 2009-06-10 22:19 ) ( 1 bytes ) +1 snakes shouldn't waste time biting ankles when there are bigger rats to catch --- Frank ( 2009-06-11 11:50 ) ( 697 bytes ) +1 Frank has custody of the evidence+link to evidence --- DWA ( 2009-06-11 14:40 ) ( 119 bytes ) +1 let's be sure we all have this right --- Frank ( 2009-06-11 15:44 ) ( 913 bytes ) +1   Merely asking for affirmation or denial, Frank+ --- DWA ( 2009-06-11 17:20 ) ( 994 bytes ) +1 there is only one issue here and it is not Angus and it is not me --- Frank ( 2009-06-11 20:15 ) ( 1128 bytes ) +1 A simple yes or no would conclude the matter for me. --- DWA ( 2009-06-11 20:31 ) ( 166 bytes ) +1 whoever is scoring points, it is not you --- Frank ( 2009-06-11 22:38 ) ( 896 bytes ) +1 Will the defendants please rise to the occasion? *moderated* --- DWA ( 2009-06-12 00:34 ) ( 148 bytes ) +2 Naughty, Frank. --- DWA ( 2009-06-12 04:13 ) ( 125 bytes ) +1 things I don't concern myself with --- Frank ( 2009-06-12 11:44 ) ( 550 bytes ) +1 Cultivating the stony subducted alpine soil for voles+ --- DWA ( 2009-06-12 13:03 ) ( 655 bytes ) +2 corn is irrelevant; you are quite a few beans short of a full can --- Frank ( 2009-06-12 16:09 ) ( 1296 bytes ) +1   Re: corn is irrelevant; you are quite a few beans short of a full can --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-12 18:59 ) ( 167 bytes ) voles don't go down bunnytrails --- Frank ( 2009-06-12 16:45 ) ( 312 bytes ) +1   Respond to the TT Religion link, Angus' claims there, or not --- DWA ( 2009-06-12 20:36 ) ( 195 bytes ) +2 respond to this first --- Frank ( 2009-06-12 21:17 ) ( 58 bytes ) +1 Unscrambling Frank's induced confusion and intentional doubt --- DWA ( 2009-06-12 23:34 ) ( 900 bytes ) link +1 DWA: scatterguning deifnitions when he doesn't have a clue? --- Frank ( 2009-06-13 00:23 ) ( 103 bytes ) +1   Re: for Frank's clarification --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-13 18:13 ) ( 1121 bytes ) +2 2X too many --- DWA ( 2009-06-13 18:28 ) ( 1 bytes ) Angus is jealous of his self-provided spotlight? --- DWA ( 2009-06-13 18:29 ) ( 565 bytes ) +1   Re: DWA being met by his own dishonesty? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-14 09:20 ) ( 119 bytes ) link +1 Intelligently designing and improving our biospheres --- DWA ( 2009-06-14 13:14 ) ( 89 bytes ) Re: Prescription? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-13 08:24 ) ( 2674 bytes ) link +2 doubled --- DWA ( 2009-06-13 17:59 ) ( 41 bytes ) Canadian Shedevil called me a liar once, too --- DWA ( 2009-06-13 17:59 ) ( 682 bytes ) +1 Re: IHXENs and DWA's skepticism and lack of respect in posting --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-16 14:47 ) ( 4522 bytes ) +1 Also have not tried cholera, typhus, or meningitis --- DWA ( 2009-06-16 22:10 ) ( 979 bytes ) +1   Re: The abject shame of DWA --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-17 06:55 ) ( 313 bytes ) +1   A firewall against nutcases & reinforced plastic tents. Frank's Tijuana ID? --- DWA ( 2009-06-17 09:18 ) ( 1197 bytes ) ROTFLMAO! --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-12 09:46 ) ( 9 bytes ) +1 Also LOL at the quirky strained lame language credibility --- DWA ( 2009-06-14 12:46 ) ( 569 bytes ) Hey, Mr Spell Checker! --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-12 09:56 ) ( 52 bytes ) Re: Mediocrity happens in the softer sciences but who's noticing? --- The Barbarian ( 2009-06-10 21:52 ) ( 78 bytes ) +1 Psychology is a fairly soft science, also, politics. --- DWA ( 2009-06-10 22:18 ) ( 1 bytes ) Re: Mediocrity happens in the softer sciences but who's noticing? --- The Barbarian ( 2009-06-10 21:52 ) ( 78 bytes ) Re: We haven't evolved some learning mechanisms --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-09 11:04 ) ( 2139 bytes ) link +3 Re: Re: We haven't evolved some learning mechanisms --- cadizat ( 2009-06-12 00:24 ) ( 198 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: We haven't evolved some learning mechanisms --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-12 19:05 ) ( 153 bytes ) Re: Re: We haven't evolved some learning mechanisms --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-12 09:48 ) ( 152 bytes ) Re: Re: We haven't evolved some learning mechanisms --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-12 09:49 ) ( 152 bytes )   We "evovled" Spell Check instead --- Crossbowman ( 2009-06-11 17:18 ) ( 14 bytes ) +2   Misspell, minus 2 points, CMB --- DWA ( 2009-06-11 19:58 ) ( 11 bytes ) !@#$%^&*! spelling police --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-12 09:52 ) ( 47 bytes ) +1 Cross crossbow, and acrostic CF --- DWA ( 2009-06-12 13:55 ) ( 1 bytes ) Re: We haven't evovled some learning mechanisms --- cadizat ( 2009-06-12 00:18 ) ( 1412 bytes ) Re: We haven't evolved some learning mechanisms --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-12 12:01 ) ( 8066 bytes ) link +2 Me-e-e too, but it needs to be fun++ --- DWA ( 2009-06-12 13:45 ) ( 4050 bytes ) Re: Re: A new and more powerful learning mechanism? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-13 09:01 ) ( 2770 bytes ) link +1 Re: Re: Re: A new and more powerful learning mechanism? --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-15 09:08 ) ( 402 bytes ) +2 Pass-fail, digital notation. Uncertainty abounding --- DWA ( 2009-06-15 14:15 ) ( 569 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Re: A new and more powerful learning mechanism? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-16 15:13 ) ( 2602 bytes ) link +2 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A new and more powerful learning mechanism? --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-19 11:35 ) ( 62 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A new and more powerful learning mechanism? --- cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-19 11:36 ) ( 62 bytes )