Posted by: DWA
05/02/2008, 12:45:00
(About author)
Edit
|
I concede that Darwinism is supported by sketchy evidence. To conclude that it is inferrable as an exclusive solitary universal process is going overboard, that's all, IMO. Today's TT toot: Friday, May 02, 2008. Constitution Day (Japan)
Today's words for the wise (or otherwise). . ."Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" .
.
..
...
o
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29542
Pigs win constitutional protection
(o;
...
..
.
Cogito ergo spud: I think, therefore I yam
(Yam = dolce spud)
.
.
|