any way your windmill blows?

any way your windmill blows?
Re: Absence of Intelligent Design evidence. Darwinist reporters go overboard -- DWA	Post Reply		Forum

Posted by: Frank
05/02/2008, 15:13:49

(About author)

Edit

DWA: I concede that Darwinism is supported by sketchy evidence.

Some sketches are more detailed than others. In the case of evolution, there are a LOT of sketches involved and they are all consistent with the same big picture.

DWA: To conclude that it is inferrable as an exclusive solitary universal process is going overboard, that's all, IMO.

I haven't heard that it is considered anything of the sort. Are you sure that you aren't just having a fight with an imaginary windmill here?

DWA: "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

True, but the more the absence, the more limited the likelihood.

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert

Previous | Next | Current page

Followups

1% Chuckle, hat cautionary removal --- DWA ( 2008-05-02 18:40 ) ( 579 bytes ) +1
- the alumni of your school must not know much --- Frank ( 2008-05-02 19:36 ) ( 1047 bytes ) +1
  - Linkage/grouping of "non-coding" DNAs and phylogenies --- DWA ( 2008-05-02 23:26 ) ( 529 bytes ) +1
    - comparing parts from the catalogue? --- Frank ( 2008-05-03 01:28 ) ( 1015 bytes ) +1
      - ?Crossbowman addressed: You are what you eat:+ --- DWA ( 2008-05-03 12:57 ) ( 1571 bytes ) +1
        
        DWA and a fifty foot chicken? --- Frank ( 2008-05-04 02:24 ) ( 2206 bytes ) +1
        
        Natural law. Ground rules. Arbitrary sacred? hierarchies --- DWA ( 2008-05-04 11:23 ) ( 1257 bytes ) +1
        
        out of order? --- Frank ( 2008-05-04 17:10 ) ( 1281 bytes ) +1
        
        Dewey Decimal intelligent order out of chaos. Anacondas could fly? --- DWA ( 2008-05-05 11:26 ) ( 2992 bytes ) +1
        
        making Paley pale? --- Frank ( 2008-05-05 15:46 ) ( 5488 bytes ) +1
        
        Ask a mammoth about their tribal legends? --- DWA ( 2008-05-05 21:31 ) ( 1262 bytes ) +2
        
        watch this --- Frank ( 2008-05-06 01:17 ) ( 2096 bytes ) +1
        
        Ur-chicken, "X", or "G-d" dealt the first card? --- DWA ( 2008-05-06 12:20 ) ( 436 bytes ) +1
        
        revelation --- Frank ( 2008-05-06 19:03 ) ( 363 bytes ) +1
        
        Dinosaur ancestor to chicken, but not tyrannosaurus? Case dismissed? --- DWA ( 2008-05-06 22:08 ) ( 2634 bytes ) link +2
        
        judge and jury-rigged --- Frank ( 2008-05-07 01:42 ) ( 1916 bytes )
        were diapsids designed? --- Frank ( 2008-05-07 01:57 ) ( 2240 bytes ) +1
        
        ID is impregnable :-)))) --- DWA ( 2008-05-07 10:26 ) ( 632 bytes ) +1
        
        so are spayed kittens --- Frank ( 2008-05-07 15:02 ) ( 688 bytes ) +1
        
        Reading the camelia (tea ) leaves. Failure is no proof of impossibility --- DWA ( 2008-05-07 21:39 ) ( 1017 bytes )
        
        The naked brain redux --- crossbowman ( 2008-05-07 15:18 ) ( 1529 bytes ) link +1
        
        Mathematics: just another designing toy? --- DWA ( 2008-05-07 22:01 ) ( 526 bytes )