| out of order? | |||
| Re: Natural law. Ground rules. Arbitrary sacred? hierarchies -- DWA | Post Reply | ![]() |
Forum |
|
Posted by: Frank 05/04/2008, 17:10:54 (About author)
Edit |
DWA: I need *your* definition and explanation of the hierarchy phenomenon, then. The hierarchy of living things is a system of recognition and grouping by common traits with segregation driven by different traits. The explanation for such an arrangement is descent with modification from a common ancestor.
If it is "naturally" ordered, then intelligence was not needed. If it's just a matter of human perception, then falsifying observations should be pretty easy to find unless some outside intelligence is more interested in being a trickster than running the world. That would violate a load of assumptions behind most designists. DWA: With my recent learning/discovery of the concept of "cladism", I see that more than one "hierarchy" system might exist in minds somewhere. A perceived hierarchy may not be the "real" one. That's what "wars" are able to sort out? Well, as I just said, if that's the case, there should be some falsifying findings that you could present without too much effort. A bat with feathers? A bird with a placenta? A fox with hooves? A cow with continuously growing upper incisors? |
| Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert |
|
Previous | Next | Current page |
|