| Consciousness/inspiration comes from where? Successive approximations of truth | |||
| Re: You should hold onto your day-job as well. -- crossbowman | Post Reply | ![]() |
Forum |
|
Posted by: DWA 05/13/2008, 11:48:49 (About author)
Edit |
Crossbowman:"The design is inelegant, inefficient, wasteful, and misleading in that it leads others to surmise an evolutionary model when actually She just snapped Her divine fingers and said, "Be"." Myself, I am only going so far as to blindly presume that there is/are higher power(s), not knowing anything about what they exactly are. Differing from Frank, perhaps, I just assume that a higher *something* out there is practically a logical certainty, and that should be reserved some space in our theories of "everything". Crossbowman:" We've already declared the Deity omnipotent, so She isn't limited to the design constraints we have to live with." No, myself, AFAICS, omnipotent could just be relative to us insects, just more potent. Crossbowman:" She can just Will into existence whatever pleases her - and yet She's pursued this wasteful and deceptive design." Well, that may be the way it's taught in Friday/Sabbath/Sunday even Wiccan school, but I'm not buying it. Crossbowman:" Is the Deity an idiot? Or is the Deity intentionally trying to trick us as to our own origins?" Cyanide answered you rather well, Greek god analogy, I thought, parallel post. Crossbowman:"Unless you postulate that the deity USED evolution to achieve Her Ends (the extra genes being a necessary part of that method), in which case you have travelled back to the pool-table view of deity: being omnipotent and omniscient, the deity started all with a single thrust of the pool cue and has since allowed all to flow - without need of further intervention - along the lines which She predicted and intended. And, from the point of view of us pool balls bouncing about on the table itself, a Deity who just sits back and watches is functionally identical to no deity at all. " I have been driving towards such a wind it up and forget it scenario lately, yes. My current thrust is that there are several distinct regimes where creation/evolution/growth/change/adaptation operates under varied rules. That seems to be the case with Doppler theory, also, wave behavior in various media and regimes, one formula/formulation does not really cover all relativistic and gravitational (or gravity oblivious) cases.
|
| Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert |
|
Previous | Next | Current page |