T.Rex ancestor of chicken? Cackling sycophants already shown easily at Google

T.Rex ancestor of chicken? Cackling sycophants already shown easily at Google
Re: wrong burden -- Frank	Post Reply		Forum

Posted by: DWA
08/04/2008, 19:30:11

(About author)

Edit

When this first came out, earlier this year, about April, popular media explicitly saying chickens came from T. rex, Frank, you had an adequate showing in news links I posted of people running with that ball.

Then we got to the original Science study, after some slow mail suspense, and it was more discrete.

Did anyone besides me blow a whistle on them media quacks? Can you show me? Or, are you going to be a chicken?

Show me, then, please, how a careful reading of the follow-on "popularizing" reports did not actually explicitly say what was not true, namely that there is a solid continual link shown between T. Rex and your breakfast-enhancing cacklers.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=t+rex+ancestor+of+chicken&sa=X&oi=revisions_inline&ct=unquoted-query-link

Again, it seems from the first page of links, it is even worse than Frank ?persistently wants to believe. OTOH, Google again truly shines as a relevant research devise.

. . .. ... o http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29542 Pigs win constitutional protection (o; ... .. . Cogito ergo spud: I think, therefore I yam (Yam = dolce spud) . .

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert

Previous | Next | Current page

Followups

the job of media is to sell ad space, not to report accurate science advances --- Frank ( 2008-08-04 20:13 ) ( 1227 bytes ) +1
- Selective with your meaning of "media"? --- DWA ( 2008-08-04 20:22 ) ( 942 bytes ) +1
  - I did sayPOPULAR media, didn't I? --- Frank ( 2008-08-04 22:19 ) ( 274 bytes ) +1
    - Does top stratum contain NEJM? --- DWA ( 2008-08-04 23:21 ) ( 1290 bytes ) +1
      - Yes, but nothing from the Discovery Institute --- Frank ( 2008-08-05 02:07 ) ( 2723 bytes ) +2
        
        Discovering successful science explorers in Washington State --- DWA ( 2008-08-05 10:37 ) ( 1328 bytes ) link +1
        
        No Dar-Winner here --- Frank ( 2008-08-05 14:47 ) ( 286 bytes )
        
        Smithsonian's Peer Reviewed Journal --- DWA ( 2008-08-05 10:55 ) ( 1786 bytes ) link +1
        
        You mean un-peer reviewed? --- Frank ( 2008-08-05 14:53 ) ( 829 bytes ) +1
        
        Scientists & humans are egotistic, opportunistic and have dominance needs? --- DWA ( 2008-08-05 23:07 ) ( 1699 bytes ) +1
        
        a peer in a realm far, far away? --- Frank ( 2008-08-06 17:34 ) ( 2583 bytes ) +1
        
        Skirting around that flawed "Doctoral" leadership shown in the link+ --- DWA ( 2008-08-06 22:48 ) ( 773 bytes ) +1
        
        trends vs individuals? --- Frank ( 2008-08-07 02:06 ) ( 949 bytes ) +1
        
        How long, oh, how long the wait, then?++ --- DWA ( 2008-08-07 12:37 ) ( 2415 bytes ) +1
        
        not much to discuss here --- Frank ( 2008-08-07 17:46 ) ( 3663 bytes )