It does not appear that you understand the use of peer-reviewed literature in the context of this case. Perhaps if you can show me where the treatment administered to this unfortunate child was the result of some sort of well-agreed-upon methodlology that had withstood scrutiny in some major medical jounrnals, we can talk about it. Otherwise, you are simply drifting without any real grip onthe essence of the subject here.

DWA: Would you contend, then, that nobody out there in the popular media and sycophant academia combine makes public assertions presupposing that the "knowledge acquisition" process on the appearance of life and its unfolding is adequately completed, making its broad settled (non ID) assumptions?

Your question is so rambling and non-specific, not to mention asking for a declaration of a universal negative, that it is impossible to answer. Perhaps you would get more focused answers if you quit trying to impress yourself with how smart you think you sound.

DWA: To me it is clear that NEITHER the creationists nor the "Darwinists" are entitled to retire from actively searching and questioning.

What is a Darwinist? Who said that anyone is entitled to such retirement anyhow? Another DWA-strawman here?

I asked: Well, how do mechanics and drywall hangers disseminate new discoveries in their fields?

DWA: By example and proven visible "success" (better looking watch dog). Have you seen drywall hangers use leg-extending "stilts" to make the finishing/taping of ceilings quicker if not easier? Are they taking over?

Uh, you didn't answer my question. Please read it again.

DWA: This non-accidental "intelligent design" and its adoption, without waiting for a basketball team to retire is indicative to me that your dearly treasured Darwinian theory has *some* conceptual application/justification. Assuming, that is, that increased work output is a basic virtue, not held back by union rules.

The relevance of this to biological evolution by RM+NS is...what?

DWA: Oddly, though, auto mechanics, as well, gaining advantage over competition for the scarce consumer dollar, seem to use "software" and added/continually refreshed knowledge, as well as, air and electrical tools, and advanced digital devices to improve their troubleshooting and correcting output.

The method for dissemination of such knowledge is...what? People? USA Today? If an auto mechanic wants to adjust the crystal aura of your car for the standard hourly labor rate because he heard somewhere that do so will improve mileage, will you agree? If he suggests additives that are advertised in the back of the Weekly World News, do you have him pour them in?

DWA: In brief: Frank, no-one can show that the pursuit of total universal knowledge on the emergence unfolding of life saga is dot-connected complete. Probably never will, IMO, even with this/us present wave of self-aware introspective tinkering "higher" life forms.

Where has anyone here ever suggested otherwise? You really ought to be getting tired of yourself...I know that I am getting tired of being asked to defend positions that i have never taken.

DWA: Homework assignment: :-) If the "wheel" is shown to be "invented" in more than one place, (Mars and Earth) does that rule out an original "intelligent designer" backstage?