It remains laughable, though, the religious-like fervor of rather apparent blind belief and obeisance happening out there at the Darwinian shrine/sheep fold.

I will merely knee-jerk respond that, for common precedent, many doubtful concepts are held by millions, if not billions of people.

Also, a nail sized hole in a leaky bucket (Darwinians have NOT connected all of the dots) still makes a bucket leak.

Or, you don't require that DNA evidence brought to a laboratory have a verifiable chain of high-integrity custody, and even must be independently reproducible?

I'm still absorbing the Wiki "peer review" article. Evidently it makes some "unrebuttable" powerful points from "great minds", insider awareness of the process of scientific review in practice being shown.

In brief: Let's not all be deer caught frozen in the headlights, by the powerful scientific research probers who, after all, may migrate in herds and cover some of their tracks, with Zamboni grass-seeding editorial machines.