DWA: Maybe yes. You are attaching more importance than is justified to a "name", namely an egg.

No, that wasn't it...You could try again, but I figure the odds are against it.

DWA: I work the "word"/definition street pretty hard at times myself. Case in point, what, exactly IS a human foetus?

A human fetus is an in-utero developmental stage of homo sapiens.

DWA: As for the number of MY huevoes all you will ever be permitted to do is to extrapolate from other Aardvark intimacies/autopsies, or else slip a bribe to my latest CAT scan analyst.

While CAT scans are pretty good at examining soft tissue, I would be worried about that there may not be enough density there for anything to show up. I would guess, however, that Throckmorton's sign would clearly indicate the presence of an intra-cranial deficit.

DWA: So, Frank, what question would penetrate your shell? (Fraudian hat-on) You really haven't demonstrated a pro-active approach to evolution questions, IMO. It's been more of a passive aggressive reaction. (Fraudian hat - off)

I have made it pretty clear what I expect before I crack. Perhaps a re-read of Dune would help you develop a more fruitful approach.

DWA: Arrogantly, egotistically, I think I have you stuck in your own self-created tar pits. All because you and Skibummer chose not to concede a fairly minor peripheral point -- namely, that a human foetus in high probability IS an animal in most reference/classification schemes.