Why did that particular double rebuttal happen so fast?

Why did that particular double rebuttal happen so fast?
Re: Re: can you trust a monkey swearing on a stack of Bibles? -- cyanidefreak	Post Reply		Forum

Posted by: DWA
06/24/2009, 17:56:25

(About author)

Edit

So, the possibility persists that "mankind" is evolving beyond the "animal".

Heheh, you both fell for my "trick".

. . .. ... o http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29542 Pigs win constitutional protection (o; ... .. .

THINK, OR thwim

. .

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert

Previous | Next | Current page

Followups

prior to any self-congratulatory scratching... --- Frank ( 2009-06-24 20:16 ) ( 118 bytes ) +1
- Brushing by my original obsession, what is "evolution" (vs. other scenarioes?) --- DWA ( 2009-06-24 20:33 ) ( 516 bytes ) +1
  - changes in allele frequencies over time as opposed to a ladder of progress? --- Frank ( 2009-06-25 00:33 ) ( 1144 bytes ) +1
    - Re: changes in allele frequencies over time as opposed to a ladder of progress? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-25 07:31 ) ( 2296 bytes ) link +1
      - Accuracy is enhanced when better definitions are sought? --- DWA ( 2009-06-25 15:33 ) ( 949 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Accuracy is enhanced when better definitions are sought? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-25 16:16 ) ( 282 bytes ) link +1
        
        1st embedded link undersized, second one verrry pretty --- DWA ( 2009-06-26 11:50 ) ( 89 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: 1st embedded link undersized, second one verrry pretty --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-27 12:47 ) ( 162 bytes )
Re: Why did that particular double rebuttal happen so fast? --- Cyanidefreak ( 2009-06-29 17:16 ) ( 107 bytes ) +3
- Intelligently designing the one-tribe, multi-family noetic Earth+ --- DWA ( 2009-06-30 09:38 ) ( 1371 bytes ) +1
  - What original intelligent design? --- Crossbowman ( 2009-07-01 18:13 ) ( 46 bytes )
- Re: Re: Evolution of humankind "beyond" the animal? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-06-30 09:38 ) ( 1780 bytes ) link
- What if we're doing it now? --- Crossbowman ( 2009-07-01 18:34 ) ( 1139 bytes ) +2
  - Re: What if we're doing it now? --- Cyanidefreak ( 2009-07-02 09:47 ) ( 411 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Re: What if we're doing it now? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-03 14:32 ) ( 1250 bytes ) +1
      - Angus refused to play marbles on the "me" in "metaphysics"+link --- DWA ( 2009-07-03 19:18 ) ( 828 bytes ) +2
        
        Re: Angus refused to play marbles on the "me" in "metaphysics"+link --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-03 20:38 ) ( 655 bytes ) +1
        
        Angus calls DWA a liar over this? --- DWA ( 2009-07-03 23:44 ) ( 4366 bytes ) link +1
        
        Re: Angus thinks doggie posters may need bones VERY desperately. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-04 14:17 ) ( 1259 bytes ) +1
        
        Spawn/litter of dhole? --- DWA ( 2009-07-04 14:35 ) ( 69 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Spawn/litter of dhole? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-12 08:13 ) ( 135 bytes ) link
        
        Re: Mistaken allegation, unsupported, Not worth replying to (MA, U. NWRT) --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-03 20:40 ) ( 1 bytes )
  - Re: What if we're doing it now? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-03 14:45 ) ( 861 bytes ) link +1
    - Intelligently designed microbes to produce grassoline --- DWA ( 2009-07-03 18:57 ) ( 247 bytes )