| Re: Angus thinks doggie posters may need bones VERY desperately. |  | ||
| Re: Angus calls DWA a liar over this? -- DWA | Post Reply |  |
Forum |
|
Posted by: Angus Cunningham 07/04/2009, 14:17:33  (About author)
Edit |
I have asked a question. I have pointed out that the spelling of the word "meaning" is close to that of "me-and-ing". The only difference is a "d". DWA: "The point IS clear, is it not?" What point? Mine might be clearer now. I hope so. But DWA's? Is DWA's point clear to any semblance of living matter other than DWA's ardvarkian whatnot? DWA: FWIW, Angus' imperial ultimatum was answered in under 3 hours, and the silence is, well, golden. So far." Answered? That DWA continues to post does not mean he has answered my request of Moderator Frank. It means he has posted and claimed to have answered mine. Dogs chewing a bone after having been thrown one are still dogs, and are they not all the more obviously dogs if they demonstrate they can't do much else but chew bones? And dogs who manage to yelp "imperial ultimatum" when their master's voice makes a request would be most valuable if placed behind bars in a cage with a 60s record player because surely that would grab the crowds filing past in a zoo, nicht wahr, and perhaps they, as dogs, like records of their master's voice?  |
| Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert |
|
Previous | Next | Current page |
|
