Re: Skep's probity probed

Re: Skep's probity probed
Re: Source for that copy-paste -- DWA	Post Reply		Forum

Posted by: Angus Cunningham
11/12/2009, 09:15:50

(About author)

Edit

Is DWA telling us that Skep's a flagrant plagiarizer?

Well, I could hypothesize that DWA was making an inauthentic innuendo -- on this occasion concerning Skep's probity, but if one checks DWA's link out, one finds that either Skep's a plagiarizer or else he's masquerading as Charles Q. Choi, and how much probity adheres to Skep in either of those two of only two possibilities?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33721697.

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert

Previous | Next | Current page

Followups

Re: Re: Skep's probity probed --- Remi ( 2009-11-12 10:09 ) ( 129 bytes ) +3
- S-D admits today --- DWA ( 2009-11-12 11:08 ) ( 852 bytes ) link
- Re: Re: Re: Skep's probity probed further --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-12 15:08 ) ( 3058 bytes ) link +1
  - All of which basically means ... --- Crossbowman ( 2009-11-12 15:40 ) ( 635 bytes ) +1
    - Re: All of which basically means ... --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-12 23:15 ) ( 1605 bytes ) +3
      - Diagnose first, treat second, or slap a "workaholic" label on them. --- DWA ( 2009-11-12 23:58 ) ( 916 bytes ) link
      - double- deleted --- DWA ( 2009-11-12 23:58 ) ( 2 bytes ) link
      - Which certainly merits discussion ... --- Crossbowman ( 2009-11-13 23:21 ) ( 1117 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Which certainly merits discussion ... --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-14 06:25 ) ( 1157 bytes ) link +2
        
        Breeding out anger and antipathy is progress? --- DWA ( 2009-11-14 11:16 ) ( 775 bytes ) +1
        
        That wasn't quite what I got out of it --- Crossbowman ( 2009-11-16 23:48 ) ( 1053 bytes ) +2
        
        My spin: Angus needs anger control more than the average "evolved" X --- DWA ( 2009-11-17 10:59 ) ( 2148 bytes )
        Re: That wasn't quite what I got out of it --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-18 21:58 ) ( 243 bytes ) +1
        
        Do public opinion polls work on Evo vs. ID? --- DWA ( 2009-11-19 11:39 ) ( 192 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: On voxes ... --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-20 10:35 ) ( 96 bytes )
        
        Don't overreact --- Crossbowman ( 2009-11-16 23:30 ) ( 2545 bytes )
- Re: Re: Re: Skep's probity probed --- Silverfox ( 2009-11-13 03:21 ) ( 1098 bytes ) +1
  - Useful fools give testimony and ?compel towards the opposite themes --- DWA ( 2009-11-13 10:21 ) ( 1765 bytes ) +1
    - Re: Useful fools give testimony and ?compel towards the opposite themes --- Silverfox ( 2009-11-13 11:44 ) ( 294 bytes ) +1
      - Telling bottom feeders to go walk on solid ground & playing poker in the mist --- DWA ( 2009-11-13 23:36 ) ( 566 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: Mist poker hand: black and red, and Waddington blue? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-11-14 07:18 ) ( 87 bytes ) +1
        
        Evasive --- DWA ( 2009-11-14 11:19 ) ( 1 bytes )