| Re: equal rights for Neanderthals | |||
| Re: And it will likely go on for another 20 years -- Crossbowman | Post Reply | ![]() |
Forum |
|
Posted by: dj ward 11/12/2009, 18:59:55 (About author)
Edit |
I'll allow dogs and sheep, but I am not convinced of familiarity. Langual/symbolic concepts are difficult enough to translate in one species, they're even difficult in translate in many neighborhoods. Trade is closeley related to justice; it is based on an assumption of power. Each satisfies the other inasmuch as each receives what he esteems more than the other does. One gives another what he wants, so that it becomes his and in return one receives what one wants. Thus justice is repayment and exchange on the assumption of approximately equal power positions. Revenge belongs to this domain; also gratitutde. To trade women then, in light of the extraordinary differences between tool cultures and other symbolic relics (I'm unaware of any Neanderthal art), flies in the face of "equal" power positions. That Cro-Magnon ate Neandethals seem much more likely than that they would trade with such weaklings; assuming they ever encountered them at all. Why trade when you can take? Why not herd? Or enslave? I'd like to acknowledge Cadizat's contribution also. To bury for the purpose of claiming territory, that's good. But why would migrants desire territory in the first place? To watch a hyena trot by with the late Aunt Edna's head in its mouth, that might be a motivator. Who knows?
|
| Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert |
|
Previous | Next | Current page |
|