The welfare-nanny state would solve these inequities, both fair and unfair, and relieve the hospitals from liability in blood transfusions, yes?

From that, we can surmise that among the factions viewing the health care "system" are the ones who are willing to fairly pay for their own possible risky behavior, and those who would like to enjoy greater independence, self-reliance, and prosperity due to taking voluntary abstinence/precautions. Am I in a wild fantasy, thinking that there are responsible gays who do not color their political perceptions simplistically?