Never fear, Remi, but I am high on irreducibly complex endorphin interactions and already broke/borked the 5 post limit there today.

Your two new paragraphs prompted me to google "how DNA was discovered" and got me to this link. I see no indispensability of Evo theory, just ordinary/extraordinary reverse-engineering organic chemistry processes. Really, when I see stuff about information transfer, that suggests to me an "intelligence", and a supporting complex pervasive design to those purposeful-appearing processes:

http://science.howstuffworks.com/dna.htm

"So scientists had theorized about the informational role of DNA for a long time, but nobody knew how this information was encoded and transmitted. Many scientists guessed that the structure of the molecule was important to this process. In 1953, James D. Watson and Francis Crick discovered the structure of DNA at Cambridge University. The story was described in James Watson's book "The Double Helix" and brought to the screen in the movie, "The Race for the Double Helix." Basically, Watson and Crick used molecular modeling techniques and data from other investigators (including Maurice Wilkins, Rosalind Franklin, Erwin Chargaff and Linus Pauling) to solve the structure of DNA."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Beagle