| Sounds very much like bullying | |||
| Re: Re: Re: Weasel Word Studies 101: Recognition, Practice and Technology -- cyanidefreak | Post Reply | ![]() |
Forum |
|
Posted by: crossbowman 07/29/2008, 21:17:21 (About author)
Edit |
The bully has fun at the expense of his victim. Another way to look at this is: unlimited fighting. Same basic idea - the winner's the one who's best at beating people up. If that's what we want, we can go to general and have us a fine ol' knock-down-drag-out and just leave politics out of the mix. Otherwise, I can't see how being better at beating people up actually says anything about the quality of your opinions. "Robbins’s claim fails because the Hobbs Act does not apply when the National Government is the intended beneficiary of the allegedly extortionate acts." WILKIE ET AL. v. ROBBINS. David H. Souter, Justice, U.S. Supreme Court
with John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy,
Clarence Thomas, Stephen Breyer, and Samuel Alito concurring. |
| Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert |
|
Previous | Next | Current page |
|