I think the lack of such a word is partly why I grew up unaware of the difference between language, articulation, and communication and why I had so much difficulty understanding the principle of reciprocity in communication. I understood very early the principle of reciprocity in material exchanges, but for a reason I believe is at least partly connected with the lack of the word my question sought, I did not understand the principle of reciprocity in non-material communication until quite late in life.

But for all my ranting on this subject, I do today feel everlastingly grateful to my Latin masters; we did not call them teachers, and frankly now that I think about it, I don't think they often, if ever, used the word "teach", so how they described in the masters' common room what they were doing I don't actually know. Although no one could in those days convince me Latin could ever be useful to me, somehow I found my Latin lessons fun, which empowered me painlessly to learn grammar and its value to both clarity and individuation and also empowered me to have a pretty accurate intuitive sense of what I might expect Latin-derived words in Western European languages to mean in English.