I hear your interest, Skeptic D. In answer to your question above, I try to make every one of my posts interesting to all who might read it yet also responsive at least minimally to someone who has responded to mine. I therefore generally change the addressee of my posts from, inititially, whomever I may be acknowledging or thanking or whatever, ("thou") to TT readers generally, ("you").

Art thou feeling that thou must be a champion diagnostician, Skeptic-D?

Diagnosticianism is now widely recognized as a compassionless carryover from the objective science of Newton and Descartes, i.e. not healing but enabling of the diagnoser and his/per employer to judge, and so very often to dominate, persons not yet having had enough opportunity to individuate. People sensing the validity of this philosophy will want to gain access to an institution and literature supportive of it. The following website, operated by the Center for Nonviolent Communication, is committed to proving and disseminating practical means for transforming the prevailing communications mode of the world we live in from a "dominating-dominated" dialectic to one having a more life-enhancing ethic: