Maybe your guest-unwitting-contributor could have clearly identified his/her/its overview and/or summary.

If it's a repeat, we might like to look at already completed TT Rat-dialogue. When was the previous posting/appearance?

That's a scientific principle, you know, S-D, review the literature before re-inventing the broken/bent/missing wagon wheel.

With a "foretaste" we could decide whether to chew. Without a foretaste, I have other fish to descale, one scale at a time.