Re: Re: On Islam
Re: Re: On Islam -- Angus Cunningham	Post Reply		Forum

Posted by: cyanidefreak 05/08/2009, 11:37:50  (About author) Edit

Angus appears covered in nits.

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert

Previous | Next | Current page

Followups

Re: Re: Re: On Islam --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-08 16:31 ) ( 2648 bytes ) +1   Confucians also have virtue --- DWA ( 2009-05-08 23:07 ) ( 908 bytes ) +1 Re: Clarification --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-09 14:05 ) ( 838 bytes ) +2 Corduroy shorts under the Tartan --- DWA ( 2009-05-09 15:18 ) ( 45 bytes ) +1 Re: Corduroy shorts under the Tartan --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-09 21:33 ) ( 143 bytes ) Re: Re: Clarification --- skeptic-D ( 2009-05-11 01:17 ) ( 357 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Clarification --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-11 09:33 ) ( 632 bytes ) +1 All come-uppances are not deserved, either --- DWA ( 2009-05-13 12:34 ) ( 622 bytes ) +1 Re: All come-uppances are not deserved, either --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-04 11:18 ) ( 201 bytes )   Wow, what a comeback. --- Crossbowman ( 2009-05-09 00:00 ) ( 235 bytes ) +3   Re: Wow, what a comeback. --- Silverfox ( 2009-05-09 02:28 ) ( 16 bytes )   Re: Wow, what a comeback. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-09 13:59 ) ( 258 bytes ) link +1 Re: Re: Wow, what a comeback. --- skeptic-D ( 2009-05-11 00:43 ) ( 250 bytes ) +1 Re: Re: Re: Wow, what a comeback. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-11 09:42 ) ( 359 bytes ) Re: Wow, what a mistake! --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-17 07:29 ) ( 1046 bytes ) +3 Bill Gates exploited the vulnerable? --- DWA ( 2009-05-17 10:26 ) ( 707 bytes ) +2 Re: Bill Gates exploited the vulnerable? --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-18 12:01 ) ( 482 bytes ) img Eh?? --- Crossbowman ( 2009-05-18 17:54 ) ( 895 bytes ) Re: Re: Wow, what a mistake! --- skeptic-D ( 2009-05-18 02:06 ) ( 144 bytes ) +1   Re: Re: Re: Wow, what a mistake! --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-18 12:09 ) ( 333 bytes )   Some clarification would help --- Crossbowman ( 2009-05-18 17:39 ) ( 814 bytes ) +2 Industrialization in Great Britain and USof A was fairly honest+ --- DWA ( 2009-05-18 21:54 ) ( 1141 bytes ) +2 Re: Industrialization in Great Britain and USof A is/WAS (?) fairly honest+ --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-19 09:46 ) ( 2656 bytes ) +1 Nanny state INdiscretions --- DWA ( 2009-05-19 11:24 ) ( 1239 bytes ) +1   Re: Warning --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-19 16:48 ) ( 1393 bytes ) +1 Angus was previously quite gracious, yes. Question was rhetorical. --- DWA ( 2009-05-19 18:50 ) ( 148 bytes ) +1 Re: Grace --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-19 19:24 ) ( 1358 bytes ) link +1 Imposing enforced vacations and innacurate reciprocity/ferocity --- DWA ( 2009-05-20 10:45 ) ( 692 bytes ) +1 Re: A larger issue --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-28 15:45 ) ( 2479 bytes ) link +1   All are equal before G-d? Infinitely more interesting topics. IHEXN* --- DWA ( 2009-05-29 03:48 ) ( 1609 bytes )   Re: Industrialization in Great Britain and USof A was fairly honest+ --- Silverfox ( 2009-05-19 11:11 ) ( 1120 bytes ) link +1   Identifying crooks in the watch trade --- DWA ( 2009-05-19 11:33 ) ( 343 bytes ) Re: Some clarification would help --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-19 16:58 ) ( 524 bytes ) +1 Demanding respect is droll --- DWA ( 2009-05-19 18:55 ) ( 107 bytes ) +1   Re: Demanding respect is droll --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-05-20 07:41 ) ( 735 bytes ) link +1 Good post. --- DWA ( 2009-05-20 10:51 ) ( 213 bytes ) +1   Re: Good post. --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-03 13:07 ) ( 169 bytes ) +1   Angus reluctantly seeking ways to make himself useful? --- DWA ( 2009-07-03 13:50 ) ( 618 bytes ) link +1 Re: Returning to a DWA fast --- Angus Cunningham ( 2009-07-03 13:56 ) ( 400 bytes )