Posted by: DWA
11/06/2009, 12:51:04
(About author)
Edit
|
Angus:"As usual, the Skep offers no data, logic, rationale, rhyme, or reason for his "projectio ad absurdam diagnosticianism". Any votes for Pope Skep? " I think you are quite possibly mistaken, Angus, with your un-peer-approved/disapproved soft science X-theories if you are pretending to present this confrontation as one between science and religion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlatan
.
.
..
...
o
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29542
Pigs win constitutional protection
(o;
...
..
.
THINK, OR thwim
.
.
|